Thoughts on DollsCastle LHP
- Echo_Chamber
- Senior Member
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2023 2:21 am
- Contact:
Thoughts on DollsCastle LHP
Also, any info on their TPE blend would help immensely. Looking for something soft and resilient.
Thanks in advance, gentlemen!
- cycleingking
- Doll Mentor
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2022 12:57 am
- Location: Middle of America engulfed by mistresses
- Contact:
Re: Thoughts on DollsCastle LHP
As for the feel of DC TPE blend, I might recommend searching here: search.php?keywords=softness&fid%5B0%5D=262
Good Luck! The fact that you are paying attention to these type of details prior to purchase will yield great results!!
Passionate about ROS, LHP and Silicone
Mistresses
- Pussy69
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 859
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2023 1:29 pm
- Location: North Carolina, United States
- Contact:
Re: Thoughts on DollsCastle LHP
Doll's Castle 150cm K-cup Review viewtopic.php?p=2415314#p2415314
6Ye 161cm J-cup Review viewtopic.php?p=2442140#p2442140
YL 158cm I-cup (x2) Review viewtopic.php?t=176498
WM 163cm H-cup S-TPE Review viewtopic.php?t=180402
Aaffordable promotions here @ https://betterlovedoll.com/sales
Re: Thoughts on DollsCastle LHP
- cycleingking
- Doll Mentor
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2022 12:57 am
- Location: Middle of America engulfed by mistresses
- Contact:
Re: Thoughts on DollsCastle LHP
Hey i had a chance to check them out. I have not found any good pics of the 166 (Alien?) that i could make a judgement from. This is a red flag I find across so many models of every brand, Obscurity. Flat out deceit. What I mean is this, when a company designs a model with correct LHP, it is seldom kept a secret.Echo_Chamber wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 4:31 pm Looking for some feedback from owners on which DC models have good LHP. I've seen photos of the 163, 166, and 170, seem to be good, but could use a second opinion.
Also, any info on their TPE blend would help immensely. Looking for something soft and resilient.
Thanks in advance, gentlemen!
163 E cup
I see a lot of trickery with angles. Extreme back arch and no shots taken directly (centered) behind. Again, trickery tells a great deal. Now, with a extreme arch, it looks like you can get pretty decent fun. Depends on what you are looking for!
170 G cup
This one a bit more clear, I almost purchased this doll myself. I chose the WM 174G instead at the time. That might be one to also consider. Overall tho, based on the ability to do prone bone- clearly combined with her butt being so small, likely not gonna cause too big of a challenge. Skinnier dolls in the butt area are generally more accommodating. This one gets high marks from me. Worthwhile to check the growing collection of verified LHP lovelies: viewtopic.php?t=172314 You might find one you have not seen before in the process
Passionate about ROS, LHP and Silicone
Mistresses
- Echo_Chamber
- Senior Member
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2023 2:21 am
- Contact:
Re: Thoughts on DollsCastle LHP
163 E cup
I see a lot of trickery with angles. Extreme back arch and no shots taken directly (centered) behind. Again, trickery tells a great deal. Now, with a extreme arch, it looks like you can get pretty decent fun. Depends on what you are looking for!
170 G cup
This one a bit more clear, I almost purchased this doll myself. I chose the WM 174G instead at the time. That might be one to also consider. Overall tho, based on the ability to do prone bone- clearly combined with her butt being so small, likely not gonna cause too big of a challenge. Skinnier dolls in the butt area are generally more accommodating. This one gets high marks from me.
Worthwhile to check the growing collection of verified LHP lovelies: viewtopic.php?t=172314 You might find one you have not seen before in the process
[/quote]
Thanks for the response.
Yes, now that you've mentioned the extreme arching of the back to give the appearance of access from the back is become quite obvious.
I do like the bodies of DC 166D Carlyn and the lot of 163B/E (not F as I don't care much for large augments). Seem like reasonable weights, too; ~ 41-42kg. But Carlyn has her bum covered up in both rear shots, and the 163cm dolls seem to share in having their behinds shot with extreme back arches.
Bummer.
I guess then the 170cm types might be the only current offering from DC? Look like they're a bit heavy, too...
- cycleingking
- Doll Mentor
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2022 12:57 am
- Location: Middle of America engulfed by mistresses
- Contact:
Re: Thoughts on DollsCastle LHP
Hmm, ya know on further glance, That 163E might be worth more investigation.Echo_Chamber wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 9:23 pm Thanks for the response.
Yes, now that you've mentioned the extreme arching of the back to give the appearance of access from the back is become quite obvious.
I do like the bodies of DC 166D Carlyn and the lot of 163B/E (not F as I don't care much for large augments). Seem like reasonable weights, too; ~ 41-42kg. But Carlyn has her bum covered up in both rear shots, and the 163cm dolls seem to share in having their behinds shot with extreme back arches.
Bummer.
I guess then the 170cm types might be the only current offering from DC? Look like they're a bit heavy, too...
https://dolls-castle.com/product/ichika-163cm-e-dc08/
What you need is this shot without clothes on More from this shoot with more clear angles used She's a lil hottie too! I see why you are trying to figure this out. EDIT: Removed links to other brands as this is not a general thread.
Passionate about ROS, LHP and Silicone
Mistresses
- ondsdoll
- Doll Mentor
- Posts: 1137
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2023 10:41 am
- Location: The Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Thoughts on DollsCastle LHP
LHP is not correct when you need to break a girls back.
- setevoltas
- Super Moderator
- Posts: 8585
- Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2018 3:03 am
- Contact: