Two tips for WM
Two tips for WM
My head was stained from a pencil they use and she still smells of glue vapor
It is a chance that the glue did not flow directly on the head of the doll...
It would be a good idea to send the glue separately in another package.
Also you should probably not write anything on the bag where the head is.
It is also lucky that I was able to remove the stains with mineral oil...
- bigchilli
- TDF Staff Alumni
- Posts: 8405
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 7:40 pm
- Location: Bonnie Scotland
- Contact:
Re: Two tips for WM
Could have been disastrous
Get the finger out WM!
Re: Two tips for WM
Re: Two tips for WM
Sophie - JY 175 (JY Head #167)
Valentina - JY 175 (JY Head #101)
Kiania - Sino 161 (Heads S6 & S7)
Rashona - WM 172B (WM Head #64)
Helga - JY 166 (JY head #101)
Patsy - JY 166 (JY Head #102)
Ingrid - JY 166 (SM Head #76)
Monique - JY 165SR (JY Head #134)
Re: Two tips for WM
Re: Two tips for WM
I read a theory that new staff have been hired in some cases following on from Covid and maybe it's inexperienced people who are making mistakes.Sidestep wrote:What the heck is going on with the factories lately! All I see is rookie mistakes from a lot of manufactures. Makes me NOT want to spend my money. I have saved up, but stories like this make me very hesitant.
In general, the manufacturers need to up their quality control.
Problem is there is little, if any, guarantee with these dolls and if you have the option of shipping her back to the factory in the event of a problem, the cost will be borne by you and very expensive.
Sophie - JY 175 (JY Head #167)
Valentina - JY 175 (JY Head #101)
Kiania - Sino 161 (Heads S6 & S7)
Rashona - WM 172B (WM Head #64)
Helga - JY 166 (JY head #101)
Patsy - JY 166 (JY Head #102)
Ingrid - JY 166 (SM Head #76)
Monique - JY 165SR (JY Head #134)
- leni_adopted_2019
- Senior Member
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2019 1:11 pm
- Location: Southern Germany
- Contact:
Re: Two tips for WM
While hiring new staff is an explanation, ist should not be an excuse. New staff should be trained appropriately, and in their first week or so, their work should be examined by a senior staff member. There is absolutely no excuse for substandard quality on such a pricy item.PDutus wrote:I read a theory that new staff have been hired in some cases following on from Covid and maybe it's inexperienced people who are making mistakes.Sidestep wrote:What the heck is going on with the factories lately! All I see is rookie mistakes from a lot of manufactures. Makes me NOT want to spend my money. I have saved up, but stories like this make me very hesitant.
In general, the manufacturers need to up their quality control.
Problem is there is little, if any, guarantee with these dolls and if you have the option of shipping her back to the factory in the event of a problem, the cost will be borne by you and very expensive.
While WM is doing some interesting things (body makeup, automated orifice cleaning device), the still seem to lack some primitive manufacturing principles. E.g. the inconsistent joint movability can be easily solved. The torque wrench was invented 1938, so it is not really rocket science anymore. No car manufacturer would dare to tighten any screw without a pre-defined (and documented) torque. It is rather simple, but efficient and would allow a constant skeleton quality.
The basically non-existent guarantee is the main reason why I would never ever buy directly from a manufacturer. A local vendor is my personal safety net, bound by local law. If the doll is defective, I handle this with the vendor, and let him deal with the manufacturer.
Mark
--- Terry Pratchett (Wyrd Sisters) ---
Re: Two tips for WM
Yes this is repair solvent and what we can see on the photo of the bag, it's not liquid inside but rather the bag which melted under the effect of the solvent.bigchilli wrote:WOW is that the repair solvent?
Could have been disastrous
Get the finger out WM!
yes it could have been disastrous...
Re: Two tips for WM
It is a free replacement head. Regarding the warranty I had no problem with WM. My salesperson took care of it.Zuxeh wrote:Unless you cleaned it off, looks like they put close to zero effort into her makeup either, when you're buying just a head, thats rather unfair.
It is true that the makeup is lighter than that of my previous head. I saw the factory photos before delivery and I liked this new look. I could have changed the makeup until I said it's ok, you can deliver the head...
Re: Two tips for WM
Agree with you totally, Mark, which is why I always go through a vendor.leni_adopted_2019 wrote:While hiring new staff is an explanation, ist should not be an excuse. New staff should be trained appropriately, and in their first week or so, their work should be examined by a senior staff member. There is absolutely no excuse for substandard quality on such a pricy item.PDutus wrote:I read a theory that new staff have been hired in some cases following on from Covid and maybe it's inexperienced people who are making mistakes.Sidestep wrote:What the heck is going on with the factories lately! All I see is rookie mistakes from a lot of manufactures. Makes me NOT want to spend my money. I have saved up, but stories like this make me very hesitant.
In general, the manufacturers need to up their quality control.
Problem is there is little, if any, guarantee with these dolls and if you have the option of shipping her back to the factory in the event of a problem, the cost will be borne by you and very expensive.
While WM is doing some interesting things (body makeup, automated orifice cleaning device), the still seem to lack some primitive manufacturing principles. E.g. the inconsistent joint movability can be easily solved. The torque wrench was invented 1938, so it is not really rocket science anymore. No car manufacturer would dare to tighten any screw without a pre-defined (and documented) torque. It is rather simple, but efficient and would allow a constant skeleton quality.
The basically non-existent guarantee is the main reason why I would never ever buy directly from a manufacturer. A local vendor is my personal safety net, bound by local law. If the doll is defective, I handle this with the vendor, and let him deal with the manufacturer.
Mark
Sophie - JY 175 (JY Head #167)
Valentina - JY 175 (JY Head #101)
Kiania - Sino 161 (Heads S6 & S7)
Rashona - WM 172B (WM Head #64)
Helga - JY 166 (JY head #101)
Patsy - JY 166 (JY Head #102)
Ingrid - JY 166 (SM Head #76)
Monique - JY 165SR (JY Head #134)
Re: Two tips for WM
Re: Two tips for WM
I also don't buy into the whole "new worker mistakes" idea. I work for a company making ventilators. We've had to go from two production lines on one shift to four lines on three shifts. So we obviously had to hire a whole lot of people. Do these new people make rookie mistakes? Of course they do. But the trainers catch them. The testers catch them. Or the next person on the line catches them. We are taught to quality check for the person before you. So while mistakes do happen, none of them make it out the door. And i can tell you with 100% certainty that there is a hell of a lot more to building a ventilator than a doll. The bottom line is that WM doesn't give a shit and would rather wave something in front of our faces to distract us than fix the damn problems.
Re: Two tips for WM
Re: Two tips for WM
The inconsistency with the skeletons is what's putting me off another WM, which is a shame as I am getting to really like the 167 Fitness. And also the SE 167, but that is made in the same factory...Zuxeh wrote:I have to agree with most of the sentiments shared in this thread. Particularly what Mark shared on things like inconsistent skeletons, that is bordering on pathetic at this point.
Sophie - JY 175 (JY Head #167)
Valentina - JY 175 (JY Head #101)
Kiania - Sino 161 (Heads S6 & S7)
Rashona - WM 172B (WM Head #64)
Helga - JY 166 (JY head #101)
Patsy - JY 166 (JY Head #102)
Ingrid - JY 166 (SM Head #76)
Monique - JY 165SR (JY Head #134)
Re: Two tips for WM
Can totally relate to this, and its a real concern, especially with heavier dolls. The key will be your vendor for requests of this nature, when a large vendor placing many orders a week says "This customer is important, I need the frame to be consistent and tight" only then can you have any confidence in it. Otherwise it seems to be roulette.PDutus wrote:The inconsistency with the skeletons is what's putting me off another WM, which is a shame as I am getting to really like the 167 Fitness. And also the SE 167, but that is made in the same factory...Zuxeh wrote:I have to agree with most of the sentiments shared in this thread. Particularly what Mark shared on things like inconsistent skeletons, that is bordering on pathetic at this point.
I have tried vendors big and small, typically, the requests of small vendors with regard to things like this get overlooked, the factories are just not scared enough of them - despite how wonderful a vendor they otherwise are, unless it can be seen from the factory pics, it can often be disregarded.
If you would like help with a recommendation for a vendor who has the best chance of assuring this for you (in my experience). feel free to dm me, I don't think I am allowed to mention vendors directly.