Page 2 of 3

Re: Vivid raw supermodel - review

Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 5:20 pm
by Katka
Hard mannequins:

Re: Vivid raw supermodel - review

Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 5:21 pm
by Katka
Hard mannequins:

Re: Vivid raw supermodel - review

Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 5:21 pm
by Katka
Hard mannequins:

Re: Vivid raw supermodel - review

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 12:12 pm
by bonestaak
Is this the Vivid Raw Alana Rae?
I read different things aboud it? I thougt it is not inflatable? but i read at some advertisements that it is inflatable (then 600 euros is too much.
What aboud the insert? is it separate or just like the most doggy style vagina to Ass? (not usable).

I have had a lot of inflatable dolls. none of them where good (but Cayenne should be the best but also broke after a few times).
Too bad most massive dolls are much too expensive.

Re: Vivid raw supermodel - review

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 3:02 pm
by samara78
Dogbone like my selene doll. Better as a manniquin.
Vinyl with inflatable chambers.

Re: Vivid raw supermodel - review

Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2016 2:34 pm
by bonestaak
samara78 wrote:Dogbone like my selene doll. Better as a manniquin.
Vinyl with inflatable chambers.
Complete air as a inflatable doll (then you can not change the insert) or Like the Selene some chambers?

Re: Vivid raw supermodel - review

Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2016 1:40 pm
by bonestaak
Katka wrote:I said, that the supermodel is rather hard. The next pictures compares it wit a "normal" mannequin. The MLEM14 aka LEM14 (approx. 100 euro in europe).

It is shown, that :D a normal mannequin can be even harder ! :D
But the MLEM14 does of course not have a vagina

Re: Vivid raw supermodel - review

Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2016 4:18 am
by DollAfficionado
Nice blonde shot. I love her curvy hips.

Re: Vivid raw supermodel - review

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 12:28 am
by Roy Batty
Wow! That is an inflatable Doll?

It does not look inflatable? I was expecting something that looks like a blowup pool toy.

Re: Vivid raw supermodel - review

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 4:20 pm
by Bobbay
Katka,

Thank you for the great review and pictures. I am a big fan of the concept of solid dolls, meaning large ball jointed dolls that have or could be modified to have sex entries. Mannequins are challenging in the way that their legs attach. They take skills to modify for a variety of sex positions. Adding realistic looking oral capability to a mannequin can and has been done, but again requires skills and effort.

I personally am OK with a hard doll in my harem, and I have had 1 or 2. Yes, you lose something by not having soft skin. But, this type of doll has advantages:
High Durability
Light weight overall and relative to the strength of its materials
Sex positions that are harder to pull off with softer dolls- stay put, weight supporting doggie style for example

I think this concept is ripe for vendors to offer more products. I hope they will.

Re: Vivid raw supermodel - review

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:00 pm
by Roy Batty
Honestly! I like the concept of the inflation and maybe storage. But the Real Doll and Silicon dolls just look so real. But this I could see myself buying at some point.

Re: Vivid raw supermodel - review

Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2016 1:35 am
by Hopefullyoneday
Does anyone know if there are any other options besides the "goddess" and "supermodel". I would like to try this type of doll but want to know all the options. Thanks in advance.

Re: Vivid raw supermodel - review

Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2016 2:49 am
by samara78
1 am natasha doll. She is no longer listed on their site. I here she is a fun hard doll. She does have soft titties though.

Re: Vivid raw supermodel - review

Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2016 10:59 pm
by DollAfficionado
Welcome to TDF new members!

Re: Vivid raw supermodel - review

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 10:26 am
by jonathann
Pretty doll.
Are the legs securely fastened to the body or have the tendency to "save" as the Selena?