So then how do you prove a jury that you are not a pedophile when the police confiscate the 100/132cm dolls from your home? Does it matter that they have sex holes or not? I thought that you may have a case defending yourself if the dolls have no sex holes. Even if the prosecution can not prove you had sex with the child like 100/132cm doll, the judge and jury may still think you are questionable for owning a 100/132cm doll with sex holes.Kusanagi wrote:While I do not entirely agree with the car forum metaphor (as I do not find it illogical for a car forum to have sub forums focused on individual aspects of car-related discussions), however after reading your patient explanation I can see now that it is a sensible decision to establish certain rules to protect the existence of this forum that is shared by many doll owners. As you have mentioned, the reality is that people visits this forum expecting to see/read about sex dolls. So I can see the logic behind TDF's decision of denying certain dolls information to be posted. As Spock have said: "Logic clearly dictates that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few." I think we should appreciate the time and efforts that TDF's mods have spent to govern and maintain this forum, and trying to keep everyone happy at the same time.AlexKnight wrote:We have discussed such a change in management in great detail, but changing TDF to a "doll art forum" which allows every kind of doll, would hurt the forum in more ways than one, and would probably be the end of it.
Most of the visitors come here for the sexual aspect of the dolls, just look at the Doll Album, and especially, which pictures are viewed most. It will never be the fully clothed pictures that receive the most views.
Also, there could never be discussions about the sexual aspects of the dolls in such a forum. Which would be like a car forum, that could only talk about the bodywork, but not the power of the engine.
Therefore, it is fair enough that for anyone who wish to continue posting in this forum to respect such set rules. However I do not agree with some expressed concerns about DS132 dolls being related to pedophilia.
It may be questionable to some that DS132 can be purchased with vaginal hole, but please also remember that DS132 was originally advertised as a non-sex doll and I myself for one ordered it without sex hole. I enjoy the companionship of such lovely creature, as much as I adore the companionship of my collection of many 1/6 scale manga-figurines. But does that mean I intend to have sex or masturbate to my beautiful figurines? And what evidence would such accusations based on?
I adore my dolls and I project life into them with my imagination, however I do not see any of my dolls as children or substitute to children. Reality is, and as we are all well aware of, is that these dolls are made of silicone and they not real humans. To imply that one adores his DS132 may be a pedophile, or imply one's desire to have sex with such dolls as a childlike substitute because the doll has a childish appearance, IMHO that is a baseless accusation.
I failed to see the logic behind this. How can one justify himself for not being a pedophile by owning an adult-sized doll? Reality is that there are monsters out there who abuse both women and children. If one is a monster or pedophile then he is what he is regardless of what doll he owns.Filch wrote:One justification I can see is if the owner already has an adult sized companion doll, he could buy a non sex childlike doll as a daughter and he would not be accused of pedophilia.
Also, it seems that this discussion is steering away from the original topic (DS132/100 dolls' acceptability to this forum), and heading towards the discussion of whether one's taste on female distinguish him as a pedophile. While pedophilia is wrong and should be unacceptable to all regardless of cultural background because of the damage that forever scars the victims, this discussion is unfortunately irrelevant to the original topic of this post - which is whether DS132/100's acceptability to this forum
My bad for steering the discussion off topic. I just really wanted to say that nearly all of the Asian Manufactured heads/faces for small dolls look too childish in my honest opinion. If they could just make the faces more mature then there would not be this problem.