Starpery Weight Reduction 4.0 Release
Re: Starpery Weight Reduction 4.0 Release
Jael - (YL 148) viewtopic.php?f=212&t=73333
Miriame - (SM 136) viewtopic.php?f=269&t=102115
Beth - (SM 157G) viewtopic.php?f=269&t=149637
Brooke - (Starpery 148F) viewtopic.php?t=175783
***
Re: Starpery Weight Reduction 4.0 Release
I second this. Very good work Starpery
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 395
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2022 7:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: Starpery Weight Reduction 4.0 Release
I trust the love holes are more comfortable, but do they still have the problem of being too tight that they force the user out?
Kudos for still being innovative instead of going status quo
6YE 158cm A-Cup - TPE - hollow breasts
6YE 150cm B-Cup - TPE -gel breasts
Amor 168cm E-Cup - TPE - gel breasts
Starpery 171cm D-Cup - Silicone - reduced weight -gel breasts - gel butt - ROS head Hedy & Rozanne https://dollforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=171076
Irontech 167cm -Ultra Soft Silicone- automatic BJ - gel butt - ROS head S1 & S18 https://dollforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=177801
-
- Manufacturer
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:10 pm
- Location: Shenzhen
- Contact:
Re: Starpery Weight Reduction 4.0 Release
Hello 4891d, Thanks! We adjusted 151 shoulder width then there are more heads can be fit with this body, we will take new pics this week and share them with you all!4891d wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 11:07 am It's very interesting. Thank you for all these explanations retracing the whole process.
You have already been pioneers in weight reduction for TPE models and very important weight reductions for some mid-priced silicone models. With this new innovation, you put dolls of realistic size and silhouette within the reach of users who have back problems and/or who are aging. If this is done without compromising softness, it is an innovation that will tempt many people.
For the 151 cm body which becomes ultra light, it would be good to offer heads to complement that of Rong (which is pretty, but only one head available for a model, it's really limiting). To go faster, you could scan and downsize some of your heads for larger models (with this body, I would see BingBing, Misa, Iris, Kelly, Saner, Lia, Yao, An-ran, Lin, Yuyan. Rather Asian heads due to the format and silhouette of this body).
-
- Manufacturer
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:10 pm
- Location: Shenzhen
- Contact:
Re: Starpery Weight Reduction 4.0 Release
Thanks VinnyD, we are also preparing 168 H new model now, and we will solve the problem in the near future!!
-
- Manufacturer
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:10 pm
- Location: Shenzhen
- Contact:
Re: Starpery Weight Reduction 4.0 Release
Hi SalvinoRon, Don’t worry about quality issues, our team has already tested it!SalvinoRon wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 6:36 pm 172-F is, for my taste, the best looking body in the industry. Great choice for the new WR4.0, I will consider buying one if the quality is good!
- 4891d
- Doll Oracle
- Posts: 9681
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2021 1:38 pm
- Location: Where I feel good.
- Contact:
Re: Starpery Weight Reduction 4.0 Release
Starpery Manager wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:56 am
Hello 4891d, Thanks! We adjusted 151 shoulder width then there are more heads can be fit with this body, we will take new pics this week and share them with you all!
Saaskiya, my beautiful gift (Zelex GE04) : viewtopic.php?t=154462
Trixie came to me (Funwest Dolls Trixie) : viewtopic.php?t=155900
Eurydice, a nice surprise (Elsa Babe RHC019)
-
- Manufacturer
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:10 pm
- Location: Shenzhen
- Contact:
Re: Starpery Weight Reduction 4.0 Release
163 G model will be done soon! We will let you know once she is ready for W.R.4.0 production, And feel so sorry about the last experience, we have paid more attention to packing!goofy_dr_love wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 10:11 am Looks interesting. After 2 dolls with WR 3.0 and both with heavy damages on delivery I am heartbroken . But the 163G body got my attention and if it comes in WR 4.0 I am considering.
Edit 163G cup not 165
-
- Manufacturer
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:10 pm
- Location: Shenzhen
- Contact:
Re: Starpery Weight Reduction 4.0 Release
-
- Manufacturer
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:10 pm
- Location: Shenzhen
- Contact:
Re: Starpery Weight Reduction 4.0 Release
Olivia F1 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 6:58 pm The process of innovation is fascinating. Many ways to fail and only a narrow path forward to success. Not an easy problem to overcome, weight reduction. I admire the persistence, because that is what it takes.
I get a small laugh from the mental picture I conjure-up of a doll spinning, spit-roast style, while being injected with "life giving" silicone, like something out of a sci-fi movie.
Doll Love is a pure love.
-
- Manufacturer
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:10 pm
- Location: Shenzhen
- Contact:
-
- Manufacturer
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:10 pm
- Location: Shenzhen
- Contact:
Re: Starpery Weight Reduction 4.0 Release
Thanks for the support!!Tacitus_Bartelby wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 1:31 pm Posts like these make me wish we had ‘upvote’ buttons!
Great news, everyone. I’m keeping an eye on these improvements
-
- Manufacturer
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:10 pm
- Location: Shenzhen
- Contact:
Re: Starpery Weight Reduction 4.0 Release
-
- Manufacturer
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:10 pm
- Location: Shenzhen
- Contact:
Re: Starpery Weight Reduction 4.0 Release
Hello UpperLower, development is eternal, we will not stop explore more possiblity and bring more and better products to doll lovers.UpperLower wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2024 7:52 am Wow, I’m impressed! You did more than make me think… “oh they just made the skeletons out of PVC while keeping the moving parts still gear joints.” You didn’t go with the skeleton change up but rather developed a softer silicone. There is definitely a noticeable softness difference as even the gel but in my 171D is barely softer than the rest of the body.
I trust the love holes are more comfortable, but do they still have the problem of being too tight that they force the user out?
Kudos for still being innovative instead of going status quo
We are also working on new skeleton, pls stay tuned!