Page 1 of 1
Thoughts on DollsCastle LHP
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2024 4:31 pm
by Echo_Chamber
Looking for some feedback from owners on which DC models have good LHP. I've seen photos of the 163, 166, and 170, seem to be good, but could use a second opinion.
Also, any info on their TPE blend would help immensely. Looking for something soft and resilient.
Thanks in advance, gentlemen!
Re: Thoughts on DollsCastle LHP
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2024 5:41 pm
by cycleingking
This is a great resource for LHP:
viewtopic.php?t=172314
As for the feel of DC TPE blend, I might recommend searching here:
search.php?keywords=softness&fid%5B0%5D=262
Good Luck! The fact that you are paying attention to these type of details prior to purchase will yield great results!!
Re: Thoughts on DollsCastle LHP
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2024 5:54 pm
by Pussy69
Certain dolls have proper LHP but the rest don’t. Unfortunately they aren’t willing to correct them b/c in their words they aren't real women. So you may like a specific body with big breast, but the LHP is a letdown.
Re: Thoughts on DollsCastle LHP
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2024 7:19 pm
by loomis
Lhp is fine imo and the tpe blend is nice and soft
Re: Thoughts on DollsCastle LHP
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2024 7:20 pm
by cycleingking
Echo_Chamber wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 4:31 pm
Looking for some feedback from owners on which DC models have good LHP. I've seen photos of the 163, 166, and 170, seem to be good, but could use a second opinion.
Also, any info on their TPE blend would help immensely. Looking for something soft and resilient.
Thanks in advance, gentlemen!
Hey i had a chance to check them out. I have not found any good pics of the 166 (Alien?) that i could make a judgement from. This is a red flag I find across so many models of every brand, Obscurity. Flat out deceit. What I mean is this, when a company designs a model with correct LHP, it is seldom kept a secret.
163 E cup
I see a lot of trickery with angles. Extreme back arch and no shots taken directly (centered) behind. Again, trickery tells a great deal. Now, with a extreme arch, it looks like you can get pretty decent fun. Depends on what you are looking for!
- 163cm5ft4-E-cup-TPE-Sex-Doll-Willa-41.jpg (138.07 KiB) Viewed 919 times
- 163cm5ft4-E-cup-TPE-Sex-Doll-Willa-40-1.jpg (135.28 KiB) Viewed 919 times
170 G cup
This one a bit more clear, I almost purchased this doll myself. I chose the WM 174G instead at the time. That might be one to also consider. Overall tho, based on the ability to do prone bone- clearly combined with her butt being so small, likely not gonna cause too big of a challenge. Skinnier dolls in the butt area are generally more accommodating. This one gets high marks from me.
- 170cm5ft7-G-cup-TPE-Sex-Doll-Agnetha-15-1.jpg (139.59 KiB) Viewed 919 times
- 170cm5ft7-G-cup-TPE-Sex-Doll-Agnetha-15.jpg (139.2 KiB) Viewed 919 times
- 170cm5ft7-G-cup-TPE-Sex-Doll-Agnetha-16-1.jpg (134.79 KiB) Viewed 919 times
- 170cm5ft7-G-cup-TPE-Sex-Doll-Agnetha-19-1.jpg (144.05 KiB) Viewed 919 times
Worthwhile to check the growing collection of verified LHP lovelies:
viewtopic.php?t=172314 You might find one you have not seen before in the process
Re: Thoughts on DollsCastle LHP
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2024 9:23 pm
by Echo_Chamber
Hey i had a chance to check them out. I have not found any good pics of the 166 (Alien?) that i could make a judgement from. This is a red flag I find across so many models of every brand, Obscurity. Flat out deceit. What I mean is this, when a company designs a model with correct LHP, it is seldom kept a secret.
163 E cup
I see a lot of trickery with angles. Extreme back arch and no shots taken directly (centered) behind. Again, trickery tells a great deal. Now, with a extreme arch, it looks like you can get pretty decent fun. Depends on what you are looking for!
170 G cup
This one a bit more clear, I almost purchased this doll myself. I chose the WM 174G instead at the time. That might be one to also consider. Overall tho, based on the ability to do prone bone- clearly combined with her butt being so small, likely not gonna cause too big of a challenge. Skinnier dolls in the butt area are generally more accommodating. This one gets high marks from me.
Worthwhile to check the growing collection of verified LHP lovelies:
viewtopic.php?t=172314 You might find one you have not seen before in the process
[/quote]
Thanks for the response.
Yes, now that you've mentioned the extreme arching of the back to give the appearance of access from the back is become quite obvious.
I do like the bodies of DC 166D Carlyn and the lot of 163B/E (not F as I don't care much for large augments). Seem like reasonable weights, too; ~ 41-42kg. But Carlyn has her bum covered up in both rear shots, and the 163cm dolls seem to share in having their behinds shot with extreme back arches.
Bummer.
I guess then the 170cm types might be the only current offering from DC? Look like they're a bit heavy, too...
Re: Thoughts on DollsCastle LHP
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2024 10:20 pm
by cycleingking
Echo_Chamber wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 9:23 pm
Thanks for the response.
Yes, now that you've mentioned the extreme arching of the back to give the appearance of access from the back is become quite obvious.
I do like the bodies of DC 166D Carlyn and the lot of 163B/E (not F as I don't care much for large augments). Seem like reasonable weights, too; ~ 41-42kg. But Carlyn has her bum covered up in both rear shots, and the 163cm dolls seem to share in having their behinds shot with extreme back arches.
Bummer.
I guess then the 170cm types might be the only current offering from DC? Look like they're a bit heavy, too...
Hmm, ya know on further glance, That 163E might be worth more investigation.
https://dolls-castle.com/product/ichika-163cm-e-dc08/
What you need is this shot without clothes on
- Ichika-163CM-E-DC08_022.jpg (92.84 KiB) Viewed 863 times
More from this shoot with more clear angles used
- Ichika-163CM-E-DC08_036-683x1024.jpg (60.26 KiB) Viewed 863 times
- Ichika-163CM-E-DC08_037-683x1024.jpg (80.17 KiB) Viewed 863 times
She's a lil hottie too! I see why you are trying to figure this out.
- Ichika-163CM-E-DC08_042-683x1024.jpg (67.55 KiB) Viewed 863 times
EDIT: Removed links to other brands as this is not a general thread.
Re: Thoughts on DollsCastle LHP
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 3:20 pm
by ondsdoll
- dollscassle163cm-jk3-29.jpg (519.72 KiB) Viewed 469 times
back is arching in a very unnatural and extreme way.
LHP is not correct when you need to break a girls back.
Re: Thoughts on DollsCastle LHP
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 10:53 pm
by setevoltas