New Material S-TPE

EmmaLover · Post by **EmmaLover** » Mon Apr 01, 2024 9:23 pm

Cb_bs wrote: ↑Mon Apr 01, 2024 8:29 am Hi anyone get his STPE doll, share something with us pls! Thanks

there was one already posted a while ago:

viewtopic.php?t=178123

Teqfinx · Post by **Teqfinx** » Tue Apr 02, 2024 3:41 pm

Which head is the one from the stpe video? 335?

Post by **Miss Barkley** » Thu Apr 04, 2024 7:06 pm

★ New to this, confused on hybrid dolls:
➥ viewtopic.php?t=178159

Post by **WM dolls** » Mon Apr 08, 2024 4:37 am

Teqfinx wrote: ↑Tue Apr 02, 2024 3:41 pm Which head is the one from the stpe video? 335?

JK#16,silicone head

anatoly · Post by **anatoly** » Mon Apr 08, 2024 8:47 am

Just joining this discussion now. But it's very interesting to me.

I'm looking for my first doll, and it seems like S-TPE might match a lot of my criteria. I want a good tactile sensation and realistic "squeeze factor" -- especially the butt. Seems like S-TPE might be a good option. Also, as a first doll, the price of S-TPE compared with silicone is an advantage.

But I'm finding it difficult to locate videos of specific S-TPE bodies.

I like the JKDoll 160 D body shown on the WMDoll website: https://www.yourdoll.com/product/sex-doll-jkd009

Are there any videos of this one?

AtPeace · Post by **AtPeace** » Mon Apr 08, 2024 9:53 am

WM dolls wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 3:48 am
1.jpg
2.jpg
3.jpg
4.jpg
5.jpg
6.jpg
7.jpg
8.jpg

With limited exposure to dolls, I can vouch for the S-TPE. Soft, great to touch, and no odor. Much better than the two newer BBW torso dolls that I have. I'm impressed.

anatoly · Post by **anatoly** » Mon Apr 08, 2024 11:39 am

AtPeace wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2024 9:53 am With limited exposure to dolls, I can vouch for the S-TPE. Soft, great to touch, and no odor. Much better than the two newer BBW torso dolls that I have. I'm impressed.

Thanks for your info! I was only looking at silicone until I saw this S-TPE, and now I'm seriously thinking for my needs this material is a better match.

I really wish manufacturers would be more organized in showing us bodies, with matching videos, so we could have a better sense of what we're buying.

ColColt · Post by **ColColt** » Mon Apr 08, 2024 5:22 pm

I really wish manufacturers would be more organized in showing us bodies, with matching videos, so we could have a better sense of what we're buying.

Agreed. I was just looking at a website today for several girls and there were way too many showing them fully clothed in skirts, dresses or swim suits. We want/need to see LHP as that is of prime importance to most and pictures like that show you nothing in that respect. They may show two out of 15-20 other pictures but many times those are frontal/back pictures that again, show little to what interest most of us.

ondsdoll · Post by **ondsdoll** » Mon Apr 08, 2024 5:59 pm

ColColt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2024 5:22 pm
I really wish manufacturers would be more organized in showing us bodies, with matching videos, so we could have a better sense of what we're buying.

Agreed. I was just looking at a website today for several girls and there were way too many showing them fully clothed in skirts, dresses or swim suits. We want/need to see LHP as that is of prime importance to most and pictures like that show you nothing in that respect. They may show two out of 15-20 other pictures but many times those are frontal/back pictures that again, show little to what interest most of us.

WM dolls with good LHP are 164f, 164j, 160A, 159C, 174G

ColColt · Post by **ColColt** » Mon Apr 08, 2024 6:17 pm

WM dolls with good LHP are 164f, 164j, 160A, 159C, 174G

Yep, and the old 158D wasn't half bad either.

anatoly · Post by **anatoly** » Wed Apr 10, 2024 8:28 pm

I'm learning fast, thanks to discussions like this! It seems to me that with my desire for the nicest-feeling butt, S-TPE dolls might be my best option.

I've been considering silicone dolls with gel butts. Is it accurate to say that S-TPE has the same squeeze factor and jiggle as gel-filled silicone -- just without needing the gel?

Post by **WM dolls** » Thu Apr 11, 2024 2:37 am

anatoly wrote: ↑Wed Apr 10, 2024 8:28 pm I'm learning fast, thanks to discussions like this! It seems to me that with my desire for the nicest-feeling butt, S-TPE dolls might be my best option.

I've been considering silicone dolls with gel butts. Is it accurate to say that S-TPE has the same squeeze factor and jiggle as gel-filled silicone -- just without needing the gel?

Yes, you can think that way

anatoly · Post by **anatoly** » Thu Apr 11, 2024 7:30 am

WM dolls wrote: ↑Thu Apr 11, 2024 2:37 am
anatoly wrote: ↑Wed Apr 10, 2024 8:28 pm I'm learning fast, thanks to discussions like this! It seems to me that with my desire for the nicest-feeling butt, S-TPE dolls might be my best option.

I've been considering silicone dolls with gel butts. Is it accurate to say that S-TPE has the same squeeze factor and jiggle as gel-filled silicone -- just without needing the gel?
Yes, you can think that way

Thanks for the follow up... That makes this a very interesting discussion, and S-TPE a very interesting option for me. My focus is on the feel/squeeze factor, so this might work better than silicone.

JCnine · Post by **JCnine** » Thu Apr 11, 2024 10:47 am

Sorry if this was already answered......
But is it just the bodies that will be available in more detail with S-TPE?
Or are the faces also in more detail with S-TPE as well?

Post by **WM dolls** » Thu Apr 11, 2024 11:28 pm

JCnine wrote: ↑Thu Apr 11, 2024 10:47 am Sorry if this was already answered......
But is it just the bodies that will be available in more detail with S-TPE?
Or are the faces also in more detail with S-TPE as well?

The details of bodies with S-TPE have already shown at the first page.

About the face with S-TPE, the difference is not too big.
Because the head is mainly make-up, make-up is good or bad to decide whether the head looks good or bad.
TPE or S-TPE has little to do with this.