Thank you, these photos are extremely useful and the makeup done so well !
Too bad those sent by PAMPER do not contain the names to identify them.
I notice something that I don't understand even after racking my brain a lot: the eyes are always more or less round (depending on the model) than those in the promotional photos. And this is also the case in photos of buyers that I have seen.
Here is a comparative example on a model which I think shows the trouble a lot. For some reason the image is not displayed with the img tag, here is its link :
https://ibb.co/31m3PNk
I know that in photography there is already talk of different focal lengths. So in this photo of Tracy.B, the factory photo is taken up close, which tends to produce a logical spherical aberration, while that of the promotion is taken with a greater focal length at zoom, which can give the reverse (depending on setting and hardware). But this round effect is also present in the factory photos taken from further away.
There are also the shadows that have a visual impact, hair, and as well as the placement of the irises in the eye sockets. The professional photo is so realistic!
But I find that that doesn't explain everything. Look especially at the right eye on the factory photo. The lower eyelid has a "wave" shape that is not seen in the professional photo. As if the eyes were "popping out", perhaps.
is it a question of quantity of cellulose wadding to dose at the back of the eye?
Suddenly the face seems really different and less mature.
What do you think about that ? Maybe my own eyes are deceiving me
