WM 164 #16 ... opinons?
- curious_person
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:48 am
- Contact:
WM 164 #16 ... opinons?
but I started to wonder about other options
This appears to have quite a balanced body (possibly longer MTV than WM170D), nice hips, and great LHP.
I had been considering WM164F as a smaller option (appeal = hips,lhp), but was put off by the shorter upperbody.
Anyone got opinions on this model? has anyone got one and some real world photos , or better still comparisons with other dolls?
- Attachments
-
- wm164_16.jpg (83.17 KiB) Viewed 950 times
- Jonathan S
- Contributing Poster
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 5:58 pm
- Location: West Europe
- Contact:
Re: WM 164 #16 ... opinons?
The drawback of this newer model is her weight: 37 kg without head! So sorry: too heavy for me.
Src.: https://cloudclimax.co.uk/product/wm-do ... -head-162/
RD2 Body D + Brooklyn: almost everything ▲, weight ▼;
WM-155/DD + #46: weight ▲, MTV ▼;
WM-164/F + #273: THE pussy ▲, MTV ▼;
WM-172/B + #157: MTV ▲, LHP ▼;
WM-166/C + #46: pussy ▲, dog style ▼;
WM-171/H + #188: almost everything ▲, waist ▼;
WM-164/J + #230: pussy ▲, MTV ▼;
WM-171/H + #46: almost everything ▲, waist ▼;
AK2 + LS#45: weight ▲, LHP ▼
ZX164G + ZXE203: everything ▲, nothing ▼.