“Pro-Soft" Experience Program

[goofy_dr_love]

Happen to know what body size that is in the full body video?

I would like to know this as well.

If you are referring to the test video with super giggle big boobs is the 160 cm H cup T21 head.

[chevelle]

Happen to know what body size that is in the full body video?

I would like to know this as well.

If you are referring to the test video with super giggle big boobs is the 160 cm H cup T21 head.

Thanks Goofy, 82 lbs so that will be a hard pass from me unless they've done some serious weight reduction.

[BBdolllover]

Would like to have the pro-soft boobs tester as well.

[bsc2]

Since the launched of new upgraded softness "Pro-Soft", many customers are curious about the practical experience.
First, we would like to share two factory videos for "Pro-Soft" here.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/ ... drive_link

The newly upgraded "Pro-Soft" completely subverts the traditional method of removing the weight-reducing layer and adding soft silicone to achieve the effect of softening. It is a thorough reform and fundamentally solves the problem. For the weight-reducing layer, Sino-doll has been tirelessly testing and adjusting the adhesion between the material and the silicone, and finally achieved a soft feel that is infinitely close to real people from the inside to the outside. Neither will the weight-reducing layer be sacrificed to significantly increase the weight, nor will delamination occur because the material of the weight-reducing layer is incompatible with its own silicone material. The real softness is not about taking shortcuts, letting alone changing concepts secretly. The so-called "Pro-Soft" is professional, compared with the non-updated version, the softness is increased by up to 20%, and at the same time, it achieves "softening without adding weight, softening without delamination."

---“Pro-Soft" Experience Program---
There is a great chance for those who like to purchase a new doll from Sino-doll, but still hesitate because of the softness.
For testing the softness of "Pro-soft", one could buy a Silicone vagina and ass from Sino-doll, like the photos below shown.
DDC66FE8-8F8B-41E5-85D0-29A372CF8193.jpeg
B9D704A1-7285-40D4-AE5B-71C399B3C6E6.jpeg
637950CA-DD03-432A-A969-870F94AA56FB.jpeg
E454C35A-6C6F-456B-ABF5-04F70FDEA0E0.jpeg
4F7DB23E-6005-4505-B8C7-D2E2F2D2785B.jpeg
IMG_6946.MOV


The price of this masturbator is $400.00 (including freight cost to US. Plz contact with Sino-doll to confirm freight cost if you are from other countries). Unboxing review for the masturbator, sharing your feeling of "Pro-Soft" will be appreciated, and one could contact with us to get a little gift after posting the review.
Besides, if the customer who has taken part in this program by buying the masturbator and like to purchase a doll afterward, he could get the doll (not including torso from Sino-doll series) at the price with deduction of the price of the masturbator. Plz kindly note that this program is only available for direct order from Sino-doll only.

Contact with Sino-doll for more detailed information.

Does this pro-soft technology make the vagina softer than the current ultra soft option? i want to buy another Sino but my current Top Sino 159 vagina is too hard / tight even i've paid for the ultra soft option

[Sino-doll]

Since the launched of new upgraded softness "Pro-Soft", many customers are curious about the practical experience.
First, we would like to share two factory videos for "Pro-Soft" here.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/ ... drive_link

The newly upgraded "Pro-Soft" completely subverts the traditional method of removing the weight-reducing layer and adding soft silicone to achieve the effect of softening. It is a thorough reform and fundamentally solves the problem. For the weight-reducing layer, Sino-doll has been tirelessly testing and adjusting the adhesion between the material and the silicone, and finally achieved a soft feel that is infinitely close to real people from the inside to the outside. Neither will the weight-reducing layer be sacrificed to significantly increase the weight, nor will delamination occur because the material of the weight-reducing layer is incompatible with its own silicone material. The real softness is not about taking shortcuts, letting alone changing concepts secretly. The so-called "Pro-Soft" is professional, compared with the non-updated version, the softness is increased by up to 20%, and at the same time, it achieves "softening without adding weight, softening without delamination."

---“Pro-Soft" Experience Program---
There is a great chance for those who like to purchase a new doll from Sino-doll, but still hesitate because of the softness.
For testing the softness of "Pro-soft", one could buy a Silicone vagina and ass from Sino-doll, like the photos below shown.
DDC66FE8-8F8B-41E5-85D0-29A372CF8193.jpeg
B9D704A1-7285-40D4-AE5B-71C399B3C6E6.jpeg
637950CA-DD03-432A-A969-870F94AA56FB.jpeg
E454C35A-6C6F-456B-ABF5-04F70FDEA0E0.jpeg
4F7DB23E-6005-4505-B8C7-D2E2F2D2785B.jpeg
IMG_6946.MOV


The price of this masturbator is $400.00 (including freight cost to US. Plz contact with Sino-doll to confirm freight cost if you are from other countries). Unboxing review for the masturbator, sharing your feeling of "Pro-Soft" will be appreciated, and one could contact with us to get a little gift after posting the review.
Besides, if the customer who has taken part in this program by buying the masturbator and like to purchase a doll afterward, he could get the doll (not including torso from Sino-doll series) at the price with deduction of the price of the masturbator. Plz kindly note that this program is only available for direct order from Sino-doll only.

Contact with Sino-doll for more detailed information.

Does this pro-soft technology make the vagina softer than the current ultra soft option? i want to buy another Sino but my current Top Sino 159 vagina is too hard / tight even i've paid for the ultra soft option

Sure, "Pro-Soft" is a overall upgrade.

[nosmoking1979]

I have some concerns about the durability of the softness, or is that unfounded?