WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll

Headless_Too · Post by **Headless_Too** » Sat Mar 09, 2024 9:41 pm

ondsdoll wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2024 6:42 pm Do the 164f and 164J have the same body (except for the chest size) or are there minor differences?

There are some differences. LHP is slightly better on the 164J, but the thighs are a little thinner. I've enjoyed both of them quite a bit, but the 164J is the one that's still in my bed.

Headless_Too · Post by **Headless_Too** » Sat Mar 09, 2024 9:47 pm

ColColt wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2024 7:08 pm That hole looks awfully small to me. I'm no John Holmes but I think I'd have trouble there.

No, no you won't. Looks can be deceiving, very normal sized entry as well as pretty decent positioning. I had a real GF a few months back, and my 164J felt the same if not a little better....

Post by **Anmo Dolls** » Sat Mar 09, 2024 9:59 pm

Nice lady, and the #398 is one of my favorites

ColColt · Post by **ColColt** » Sun Mar 10, 2024 10:30 am

No, no you won't. Looks can be deceiving, very normal sized entry as well as pretty decent positioning. I had a real GF a few months back, and my 164J felt the same if not a little better....

I think the LHP on the 164F/J is great. That's good news about her mimicking a real girl!

jbird1980 · Post by **jbird1980** » Sun Mar 24, 2024 9:09 am

Have you weighed the 164J yourself? You know, to compare the advertised 34kg/75lb to actual in-person weight with her head on? Curios if it’s correct, cause I’m looking at getting this girl myself.

Headless_Too · Post by **Headless_Too** » Wed Apr 17, 2024 12:16 am

jbird1980 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2024 9:09 am Have you weighed the 164J yourself? You know, to compare the advertised 34kg/75lb to actual in-person weight with her head on? Curios if it’s correct, cause I’m looking at getting this girl myself.

I have not, but from moving her around I would definitely believe the advertised numbers are correct. I will say that when the need arises, I will buy this doll again. She's a keeper.