Invest in lighting or camera, which first?
Moderator: Swan
Invest in lighting or camera, which first?
So I've only really got immediate funds for either decent lighting or a decent camera but not both at once, which should I go for?
Currently using my camera phone on an old Samsung S6 which has pretty good specs for what it is, 16MP.
I'm thinking to start with lighting as my small flat doesn't get great natural light from outside and I've found it tricky getting the shoots right because it can be rather dark. Godox SL-60 seems like a good place to start, picked that up from another post on here, thank you!
Check Amy's eye candy link below and see what you think, the first shoot was really poor on lighting and then I attempted to edit with GIMP 2.10, followed by the second shoot where I improved the initial lighting and also got better at the edits, I hope!
- Willendorph
- Doll Mentor
- Posts: 1986
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2017 3:45 pm
- Location: Menzoberranzan Slave Quarters
- Contact:
Re: Invest in lighting or camera, which first?
Re: Invest in lighting or camera, which first?
Invest in lighting. No need too spend a lot for a "decent" camera. Spend more on lights and you can get a used dslr for so cheap these days. A Nikon d80 or canon 40d with lenses goes for $150 on Craigslist. But back to lighting. You can go far with learning to light with one light set up but you need to invest a bit on ancillary equipment. Like reflectors, some black wrap. Additional light stands, grip tape, some foam boards and gels for creative color lighting and other expendable items. All these items can be very cheap so you don't need to spend alot on them.jimpink wrote:Hello!
So I've only really got immediate funds for either decent lighting or a decent camera but not both at once, which should I go for?
Currently using my camera phone on an old Samsung S6 which has pretty good specs for what it is, 16MP.
I'm thinking to start with lighting as my small flat doesn't get great natural light from outside and I've found it tricky getting the shoots right because it can be rather dark. Godox SL-60 seems like a good place to start, picked that up from another post on here, thank you!
Check Amy's eye candy link below and see what you think, the first shoot was really poor on lighting and then I attempted to edit with GIMP 2.10, followed by the second shoot where I improved the initial lighting and also got better at the edits, I hope!
So yeah if you wanna go jump into the deep end, investing in lighting is a better way to actually learn the "how" of photography/film/video.
I've have had different high end pro cameras before but replaced them all with just the Panasonic G-9 a year ago but I haven't used it at all with shooting my dolls since I find just using my Samsung S9 so much more convenient (also I am super lazy). With a phone camera and decent lighting you can get rather good results. Granted a stand alone camera would be better but who has the time. Anyway that's my opinion, others might disargee but there it is. Go with lights and then camera. Good luck.
Re: Invest in lighting or camera, which first?
exec summary
1. If you go for natural ligth (read sun) you may just buy some fabric to control / hide / reveal sun light coming from window + camera
2. If you want continuous light you need a starter set and camera
3. If you want more control (but more complex) you can go strobes & camera
Less than 1000€ for natural light.
I suppose a budget of 1000-1500€ for continuous lights or strobes.
Details
order (first is most important)
1. light source (unless you want to use natural/ambiant light)
2. light modifiers (photo umbrella, softoxes), in fact modifiers are equally important with light source
you can have starter kits with continuous lights & umbrella & stands for less than 200€ on Amazon or eBay ; search for "kit studio light"
3. learn how to use your gear (spend tens of hours on YT and practice)
4. camera, a first decent camera at 800€ is enough to begin with and will give you nice pictures if you know how to use your light
if you have crap light (aka you don't know how to use your light) you will have crap pictures, even with a 10k€ camera
you have 3 types of light source :
* sun : 0€, you depend if it is present, not easy but can give you amazing shots, it is free "continuous light"
* artificial continuous light : you can get a starter set for not much money, technically it works like the sun with subtilities due to it is near the subject
* strobes / flashes : you can easily spend a lot on money, but you can start with strobes less than 50-100€ each (yongnuo or godot flash), but need to spend ~300€ for 2 flashes + stands + trigger ; I find strobes are more complex to use than continuous light (but I prefer strobes)
* must add light modifiers : start with photo umbrella then you can later use boxes, you need modifiers
My personal experience a couple of years ago :
I bought a canon 650d (maybe 600-800€)
And paid for a few hours training in order to have basics.
I spent countless of hours on YT.
I bought 2 yongnuo strobes with cord trigger, I soon bought remote triggers. I also bought 2 stands with 2 umbrellas.
I practiced.
I prefer strobes over natural / continuous light but strobes require more investisment (money, time, training).
I later bought a better camera but only after I understood the limits of my 650d.
I also soon invested in other lenses , you may even want to invest in lenses before you change you camera because the lens is a dramatic part of you picture quality. But make your you lens is compatible with your first camera and will be with your potentially next one.
edit:
You are right JJb_ing, used gear is a good way to start.JJb_ing wrote: A Nikon d80 or canon 40d with lenses goes for $150 on Craigslist. But back to lighting. You can go far with learning to light with one light set up but you need to invest a bit on ancillary equipment. Like reflectors, some black wrap. Additional light stands, grip tape, some foam boards and gels for creative color lighting and other expendable items. All these items can be very cheap so you don't need to spend alot on them.
- Ztar073
- Doll Elder
- Posts: 2119
- Joined: Fri May 19, 2017 12:54 am
- Location: Former californian
- Contact:
Re: Invest in lighting or camera, which first?
Re: Invest in lighting or camera, which first?
Digital photography never appealed to me as I enjoyed the physical aspect of film, darkrooms and the entire process. In theory it should be more convenient and the same rules apply so with more practice hopefully the better I'll get. I'm also hoping to move soon and will be looking for a larger apartment in order to easily have space for more shoots.
Ztar073 I agree a camera can open up more possibilities but for now I'm more interested in portrait photography which is something I've only really tried once and as I've said above all my prints came out with a lovely orange glare that I didn't spot!
Anyone familiar with GIMP 2.10? I've used it to edit my so far badly lit pictures and it seems to be working though I realise this is only a secondary improvement to the actual shoot itself where lighting is key.
Re: Invest in lighting or camera, which first?
which JJb_ing summarized very well
- I like blondes
- Senior Member
- Posts: 486
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2020 11:56 am
- Location: California, USA
- Contact:
Re: Invest in lighting or camera, which first?
Re: Invest in lighting or camera, which first?
I've just purchased some cheap soft box lights from eBay and will experiment with these to start with and hope to level up to your standard!I like blondes wrote:Lighting. This was taken on my cell phone using 2 cheap LED selfie ring lights from Amazon in my small bedroom. Did some post production with FaceApp & YouCam Makeup. The result speaks for itself.
Lighting first, camera second is the plan I reckon. Test my skills or lack of with the lights bought above then if enthusiasm and improvement is there, I'll look for a camera.ricric wrote:when I wrote light first I did not really mean to skip a camera, but rather don't put all your money in your camera.
which JJb_ing summarized very well
Re: Invest in lighting or camera, which first?
This was shot with a Godox AD200 with a single softbox and an older Canon 5D Mk2 to give you an idea.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/188724080@N03/
Find us on Instagram
https://www.instagram.com/lovedollphotography/
Re: Invest in lighting or camera, which first?
- -Ragnar66-
- Doll Guru
- Posts: 5972
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2019 7:19 pm
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: Invest in lighting or camera, which first?
Re: Invest in lighting or camera, which first?
Only having seen the pics posted in Amy's eye candy thread, I believe that lighting will give you more bang for your buck than a new camera.
But I'm going to toss out an idea that I didn't see mentioned by the others already in this thread.
I received a clip on lens kit for cell phone photography as a gift, and was pleasantly surprised how well those little clip on things worked. The macro lens became a staple of mine in the machine shop for taking shots of the surface finish of machined parts. The telephoto came in handy a few times around town at sunset, and the fisheye helped make a cute little skateboarding video of the niece for her to post on TikTok.
The kit I received hasn't broken yet and I've kind of abused it, especially in the machine shop. I'd assume the others out there would be pretty robust as well.
I'd recommend you look for a kit that has the zoom, macro, and UV filters you want, then consder any telephoto, fisheye, etc as bonus.
Search your favorite internet retailer for "cell phone clip on lens kit." Prices vary but for about $30 you can get a kit with 10 or more lenses to choose from.
The other thing I'd recommend is to dive into whatever advanced features there are on your camera app. I'm not sure about the S6, but my S8 has a pro mode where you can change aperture, F-stop and other settings. Figure out what's available to you and practice using them.
Finally, software. From simple little built in things in your phone to do the BW or sepia tones, to things that add bunny ears and whiskers. There is also free fully fledged photo manipulation software with features that rival Adobe PhotoShop. My personal recommendation is GIMP https://www.gimp.org/.
Re: Invest in lighting or camera, which first?
I did look at some Godox stuff Tighes1 and that'll be my go to once the first stuff lives it's life.
As for a clip on lens kit, I'm off to look for one right now. That could be a game changer in terms of affordability and multi function usability. Good tip Blisst! And I'm already using/getting used to GIMP 2.10, any advice appreciated as it's loaded with adjustments and can be somewhat overwhelming.
Re: Invest in lighting or camera, which first?
Chinese make, but to be honest they're not bad quality, and it all folds up into a couple of carry bags. They've made quite a difference to photo quality, and I'm still working to death my old Canon 300D!
Companion of the lovely Lyngheiður a.k.a Lynne - A WM153 #85 - now she has a Doll Album!
Say Hi to her on "Dolls Alive"! - Lynne's Page