The Queen of the Gym

Post by **beautifuldolls** » Mon Aug 31, 2020 7:15 pm

She's fit and sexy... Would you like her as your partner in life? Nothing more easy! Contact us to get your special TDF price!

Post by **AtomicPunk** » Mon Aug 31, 2020 7:18 pm

Great outfit. Love the boy shorts.

Ironic that gyms here in NY, USA were JUST given the OK to reopen after 6 months.

Post by **beautifuldolls** » Mon Aug 31, 2020 7:26 pm

AtomicPunk wrote:Great outfit. Love the boy shorts.

Ironic that gyms here in NY, USA were JUST given the OK to reopen after 6 months.

But you can have your fit "gym girl" sooner than that

Jokes aside... I hope that the whole covid thing can end soon.

Dollarhyde · Post by **Dollarhyde** » Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:31 am

Yummy...

Post by **dolls-castle** » Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:45 am

NO PAID NO GAINED

curious_person · Post by **curious_person** » Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:57 am

awesome photos. Greatly enjoying my 172D , shame about the awful LHP but I only need to stand her up to eliminate any post-purchase remorse. amazing body.

curiousswede · Post by **curiousswede** » Tue Sep 01, 2020 11:45 am

curious_person wrote:awesome photos. Greatly enjoying my 172D , shame about the awful LHP but I only need to stand her up to eliminate any post-purchase remorse. amazing body.

But how bad is it really? How much will it bend a straight erect penis in missionary for example and/or how much do you need to bend her to get a decent doggystyle position?

Joedude17 · Post by **Joedude17** » Tue Sep 01, 2020 12:07 pm

...no arguments from me!

curious_person · Post by **curious_person** » Tue Sep 01, 2020 12:21 pm

curiousswede wrote:
curious_person wrote:awesome photos. Greatly enjoying my 172D , shame about the awful LHP but I only need to stand her up to eliminate any post-purchase remorse. amazing body.
But how bad is it really? How much will it bend a straight erect penis in missionary for example and/or how much do you need to bend her to get a decent doggystyle position?

Missionary is fine, doggystyle you have to contort her back to an unnatural extreme. it just feels wrong and looks wrong, the gap between the entrypoint and the planes of her backside that you have to workaround. Doggystyle IRL is easy. Just be aware of the tradeoff. The 172B is supposedly better and gets you the same legs. They downgraded the D's LHP at the last minute. I think it's some sort of deliberate choice to make missionary super-easy (at the expense of everything else, or "just use the 2nd entrypoint"). I have had some minor success with her on my lap on a chair I guess.

There appears to be this tradeoff amongst current doll designs.

when you factor in the unique combination of tall athletic shape and reasonable breasts, there are no dolls with a body as good as this, and better LHP, at least not that I've found yet. So I dont have remorse, I know if i'd chosen another I'd still be here lusting over this body as a potential second

But there are dolls which show better LHP is possible. I am reading up on the mods people have done with great interest (the plan is to practice on smaller TPE toys first..)

the way I explain it.. the point of a sexy pose IRL is that it makes a woman's vagina *more* acessible, but with this LHP design it's the opposite, which is a great shame, because her legs look incredible skyward, bending over or whatever.

curiousswede · Post by **curiousswede** » Tue Sep 01, 2020 12:46 pm

curious_person wrote:
curiousswede wrote:
curious_person wrote:awesome photos. Greatly enjoying my 172D , shame about the awful LHP but I only need to stand her up to eliminate any post-purchase remorse. amazing body.
But how bad is it really? How much will it bend a straight erect penis in missionary for example and/or how much do you need to bend her to get a decent doggystyle position?
Missionary is fine, doggystyle you have to contort her back to an unnatural extreme. it just feels wrong and looks wrong, the gap between the entrypoint and the planes of her backside that you have to workaround. Doggystyle IRL is easy. Just be aware of the tradeoff. The 172B is supposedly better and gets you the same legs. They downgraded the D's LHP at the last minute. I think it's some sort of deliberate choice to make missionary super-easy (at the expense of everything else, or "just use the 2nd entrypoint"). I have had some minor success with her on my lap on a chair I guess.

There appears to be this tradeoff amongst current doll designs.

when you factor in the unique combination of tall athletic shape and reasonable breasts, there are no dolls with a body as good as this, and better LHP, at least not that I've found yet. So I dont have remorse, I know if i'd chosen another I'd still be here lusting over this body as a potential second
But there are dolls which show better LHP is possible. I am reading up on the mods people have done with great interest (the plan is to practice on smaller TPE toys first..)

the way I explain it.. the point of a sexy pose IRL is that it makes a woman's vagina *more* acessible, but with this LHP design it's the opposite, which is a great shame, because her legs look incredible skyward, bending over or whatever.

Would you be able to show what it looks like with angle and her bending when she is in doggystyle if you feel like doing it? Very much thanks in advance. I hope you are able to enjoy her in many other ways if not doggystyle very often.

curious_person · Post by **curious_person** » Tue Sep 01, 2020 1:43 pm

curiousswede wrote: Would you be able to show what it looks like with angle and her bending when she is in doggystyle if you feel like doing it? Very much thanks in advance. I hope you are able to enjoy her in many other ways if not doggystyle very often.

I bent her neck here instead of her back because that's harder and i'm kind of scared of doing it incase it loosens up too much, but you can see how far she needs to go,

: IMG_2725.jpg (2.11 MiB) Viewed 1443 times

.. and then your body needs to be vertical. you have no leeway to rotate yourself, otherwise her butt gets in the way; the entry axis here is horizontal. i need to raise her on pillows. what it would really take is a spare adjustable chair or something like that, I guess.

I should not complain too much because I kind of expected the weight would make her harder to use anyway (it doesn't so much) - I chose her more for ornamental value. The sense of presence with her height is amazing.

We just need to keep giving them the feedback. There's no reason the placement cannot be improved, and the same manufacturing process and volume of materials would yield a product with a wider range of usability.

I've followed siliconeman's threads and comments and he's right on this subject.

the angle should be a good 20degrees less extreme, it should be further back hence you should be able to rotate around her for adjustment.
the issue is that it's too far forward and it rotates further forward as you bend her hip joint.

.. but if you like using the rear passage , that would work fine (i dont like the idea myself)