Love Hole Placement for 2019 and later DS dolls?

M_K_ · Post by **M_K_** » Sat Aug 08, 2020 7:08 pm

I've heard some rumors that DS recently changed the love hole placement of their dolls and it has gotten worse.
Do we have anyone here who purchased a DS doll since 2019 to comment on her love doll placement?

For example, is doggy or prone possible?

haremlover · Post by **haremlover** » Sat Aug 08, 2020 7:19 pm

One of the best and underappreciated DS models is the 158 and 158 plus. But anal is not there for use. She was sculpted from a real woman.

I wasn't the only one to find the 167 less than satisfactory for sexual function although a gorgeous doll, the hole of the insert being too small, and converting to the EVO wasn't better. But it appears that the Summit

has had appropriate attention in this department.

Best wishes

Harem

Sidestep · Post by **Sidestep** » Sat Aug 08, 2020 9:29 pm

Poor us...why are holes so difficult...Where...WHERE is the true master of art that can give us what we cry and crave for. There must be a master out there to offer us the gift! Oh, holes and strong hands...drop the mic.

gonestill77 · Post by **gonestill77** » Sat Aug 08, 2020 9:47 pm

Worse?
I have a DS 163 plus from 2015.
I find nothing wrong with her placement.
I can hit it from behind with no problems.

Doll Master · Post by **Doll Master** » Sat Aug 08, 2020 10:13 pm

Here's one of the DS girls caught in the act. I don't have any experience with this brand of doll, but this may be a useful set for the discussion.
(release date unknown)

: 141742xq766zx6dqrwuzh7.jpg (1.61 MiB) Viewed 2496 times

: 141836ro8kojkb78ldnitt.jpg (468.6 KiB) Viewed 2496 times

: 141720wtvj8z5vt9jj2jhv.jpg (1.65 MiB) Viewed 2496 times

: 141610yuu4w05wca5laczu.jpg (1.55 MiB) Viewed 2496 times

: 141640q2jvujxvnzgjxecv.jpg (1.53 MiB) Viewed 2496 times

: 141652lwbna2ziyt9u2bbn.jpg (1.67 MiB) Viewed 2496 times

: 141708yzpdzcaueaoo6o60.jpg (1.09 MiB) Viewed 2496 times

Not quite what I'm looking for, personally. But, would also be interested in news of improvement.

Siliconeman · Post by **Siliconeman** » Sun Aug 09, 2020 2:38 pm

That last pic looks just terrible!

gonestill77 · Post by **gonestill77** » Sun Aug 09, 2020 3:57 pm

Here are some pics of my 2015 163 pluses LHP.

: 20200522_020004-01.jpeg (3.18 MiB) Viewed 2373 times

: 20200522_021209-01.jpeg (3.61 MiB) Viewed 2373 times

: 20200528_031954-01.jpeg (4.63 MiB) Viewed 2373 times

: 20200528_031931-01.jpeg (3.59 MiB) Viewed 2373 times

: 20200528_031908-01.jpeg (4.11 MiB) Viewed 2373 times

You ask if placement got worse but I don't see where the problem was to begin with.
I have had no problems whatsoever getting some doggie action. Everything lines up fine. Don't even have to prop up her knees with pillows.

I would like to see photos of an inaccurate placement on one of these ladies.

I used to have a 2013 or 2014 145 plus. She was pretty accurate on placement as well.

M_K_ · Post by **M_K_** » Mon Aug 10, 2020 11:22 pm

gonestill77 wrote: You ask if placement got worse but I don't see where the problem was to begin with.
I have had no problems whatsoever getting some doggie action. Everything lines up fine. Don't even have to prop up her knees with pillows.

I would like to see photos of an inaccurate placement on one of these ladies.

I never said there was any problems with LHP of old DS dolls from two years ago or earlier.

By "worse" I meant to ask if the new ones changed and got worse when compared to the old ones, hence the thread title.

gonestill77 · Post by **gonestill77** » Tue Aug 11, 2020 12:51 am

M_K_ wrote:
gonestill77 wrote: You ask if placement got worse but I don't see where the problem was to begin with.
I have had no problems whatsoever getting some doggie action. Everything lines up fine. Don't even have to prop up her knees with pillows.

I would like to see photos of an inaccurate placement on one of these ladies.
I never said there was any problems with LHP of old DS dolls from two years ago or earlier.

By "worse" I meant to ask if the new ones changed and got worse when compared to the old ones, hence the thread title.

Oh.

I misunderstood what you were saying.
My mistake.

Annon7 · Post by **Annon7** » Sat Sep 19, 2020 7:50 am

I just bought one. I think the LHP is just fine with that said certain positions are not recommended and tricky due to doll not suppose to stand or prone for too long.

Aeron · Post by **Aeron** » Sat Sep 19, 2020 12:50 pm

Annon7 wrote:I just bought one. I think the LHP is just fine with that said certain positions are not recommended and tricky due to doll not suppose to stand or prone for too long.

Standing I can see, but what's wrong with leaving it prone? Is this for the Summit series?

M_K_ · Post by **M_K_** » Sat Sep 19, 2020 3:35 pm

Aeron wrote:Standing I can see, but what's wrong with leaving it prone? Is this for the Summit series?

Could be concerns regarding flattening the chest?

Anyway, seems like LHP is still generally fine for DS.
But now I am more worried about how much I will be bothered by the hardness of the foam core...

Aeron · Post by **Aeron** » Mon Sep 21, 2020 10:09 pm

M_K_ wrote:But now I am more worried about how much I will be bothered by the hardness of the foam core...

Is that concern specific to the Summit? Or do the older models have that problem too?

M_K_ · Post by **M_K_** » Mon Sep 21, 2020 10:13 pm

Aeron wrote:Is that concern specific to the Summit? Or do the older models have that problem too?

I am specifically worried about older models, not sure about Summit though.

Aeron · Post by **Aeron** » Mon Sep 21, 2020 10:27 pm

M_K_ wrote:
Aeron wrote:Is that concern specific to the Summit? Or do the older models have that problem too?
I am specifically worried about older models, not sure about Summit though.

I didn't realize the older models had issues with softness... Can you post to the reviews pointing that out? Now you have me a bit concerned as well.

Though I did read that the silicon blend was made softer between 2016 and 2017. And also made softer again when upgrading from 167 to 167 EVO (link). Not sure if that improvement on the 167 EVO was also carried over to the other models, but DS apparently does make updates to their silicon blend regularly.