Invitation of customizing a girl with AA cup.

HornedPear · Post by **HornedPear** » Mon Jul 27, 2020 8:31 am

At there very least, there seems to be some degree of consensus that Sherri Vi is a good choice for a reference to base the body sculpt on. I would love to be able to buy a silicone doll with decent sexual functionality with a body like hers.

Dollyman25442 · Post by **Dollyman25442** » Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:33 am

I would buy (tpe) dolls of this sizing. And I already have several that are quite petite, a 168 WM, a 6ye 170, and an off brand "a" cup. I had at one time thought to purchase this one as well (WM)-

: 1.JPG (56.87 KiB) Viewed 1864 times

And even smaller-

Colonel Angus · Post by **Colonel Angus** » Mon Jul 27, 2020 11:39 am

HornedPear wrote:At there very least, there seems to be some degree of consensus that Sherri Vi is a good choice for a reference to base the body sculpt on. I would love to be able to buy a silicone doll with decent sexual functionality with a body like hers.

Her body isn't bad, although there are tons of gals built like her in the porn industry. Her face, although also not bad, not my cup of tea.

At.this point, I'm curious to hear what Kevin has to say, or what he thinks.

Post by **AtomicPunk** » Mon Jul 27, 2020 12:53 pm

Clothing manufactures always create quantities of size based on what the believe is the ratio of their customers to maximize profit. Long ago I worked in retail, merchandise came in varying quantities. (for example 2 XL, 10 L, 4 M and 2 S). They provide more product for the majority, but still know that there are opportunities for minority body types. In the end the sales on the majority should offset the possible "loss" on minority sizes.

I don't truly know what kind of investment a doll manufacture needs to make when creating a new doll. Is creating a mold for say, 5% of total sales a risk they want to take. Maybe they just want to go the "sell the hell out what's the most popular". Unless of course, the manufacturer wants to excel in a "niche" market and is happy with the exclusive demand thereof.

Being selfish, my love is for slim (tall or short) women. In the end i found what I wanted, but I understand that there is still a few body types that there is a demand for (even if small)

justintime · Post by **justintime** » Mon Jul 27, 2020 1:31 pm

Kevin everything about her is perfect.
IF or When you make her in Silicone I would be interested for sure.
No TPE...Thanks

DexterQuest · Post by **DexterQuest** » Mon Jul 27, 2020 8:16 pm

I've been waiting for a great tall AA-cup doll myself. I already own several WM158A and WM168A plus a Thindoll 162A. They are all lacking different ways. I can't wait for a sexy AA-cup (or A-cup with no underboob).

There are so many real girls that have hungry fans. But they don't buy a doll because no dolls look like them. This is just a partial list.

Chanel Shortcake
Riley Jensen
Sarah Jaymes
Remy Lacroix
Jade Skyee
Aimee Ryan
Sindy Vega
Jessi Empera
Andrea Anderson
Lia Kate
Rachel James

Post by **ILDoll** » Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:55 pm

Hi guys, you all have amazed me. I was absent for just two days and there have been so much comments! Thank you!

As the topic, purpose of this thread is kind of invitation for anyone who is interested in 160-168 with smaller breast. I don't think there would be some legal issues on it because she will be tall enough as an adult. No one will judge her age only on the breast, right? Regardless of face, such height is quite safe in Aus and Europe. We manufactureres and TDF managers have talked about it long before and agreed that there is not any specific stardard. On the other hand, a mature face may lower the risk.

@NormalHuman I think I shall set a pre-buy price as deposit for this body. Heads will be still chosen from the current list. This combo will include some popular options like shrugging and a few more. But I consider if it is too early currently for the price. With promotion discount, the final price would be about $2500-2900 with 5-10 people in.
Actually I am more worrying about the resource for such a body. Pictures would be fine, but not the best choice.

@Colonel Angus How do you think of it? Is it your preference?

@justintime What I talk about is the body. This face.. I may try. Could I count you in?

@Mikael123 Bud, you are in, right?

@DexterQuest I remember you. Seems that you will in.

So next step for me is to show the 3D modeling of this body. Probably 5 people at least would be more persuative to boss, who still has no idea of it. :haha4:

Sincerely,
Kevin

Mikael123 · Post by **Mikael123** » Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:58 pm

justintime wrote:Kevin everything about her is perfect.
IF or When you make her in Silicone I would be interested for sure.
No TPE...Thanks

Nice to see you on the same page as me haha.

Mikael123 · Post by **Mikael123** » Mon Jul 27, 2020 11:02 pm

Kevin, I am most certainly interested. But I am still sifting through Australian legislation to be 100% certain it would pose no import problem, or legal threat to me by trying..

Mikael123 · Post by **Mikael123** » Mon Jul 27, 2020 11:16 pm

But my crucial buying commitment will only be made upon seeing a finished product, as love hole placement is what I am after, and it needs to be as close to spot on for me or I'm not really interested.

I appreciate what you are doing here, but I can't put a payment on a product I've never seen, and just 'fingers crossed' - hope it will be satisfactory. I hope you understand.

Post by **ILDoll** » Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:12 am

Yes. It is too early talking about payment. Now I am still collecting opinions from you and someone more who is interested in her.
So you are in Australia? As far as I know, dolls beyond 150 are fine in your country.

Best,
Kevin

Mikael123 · Post by **Mikael123** » Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:31 am

ILDoll wrote:Yes. It is too early talking about payment. Now I am still collecting opinions from you and someone more who is interested in her.
So you are in Australia? As far as I know, dolls beyond 150 are fine in your country.

Best,
Kevin

Yes I'm in Australia. Anung and a few others from this forum did mention that the 'breast size' may also be a problem.. As the legislation seems to imply that it is on an 'individual basis' and up to the custom officer that checks discretion as to the implied age of the doll... Very small breasts could be targeted as 'looking underage'...

It's a tough call to make.

seagull · Post by **seagull** » Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:42 am

Birth Name: Elsa Dream Jean
Born: September 1, 1996 in United States
Nicknames: Molly; Elsa Dream; Elsa
Height: 5' 3" (1.6 m)

Of course the Oz legislation is all about a doll or any part of a doll appearing to be child-like (to the inspecting authority)

Colonel Angus · Post by **Colonel Angus** » Tue Jul 28, 2020 1:46 am

ILDoll wrote:Hi guys, you all have amazed me. I was absent for just two days and there have been so much comments! Thank you!

As the topic, purpose of this thread is kind of invitation for anyone who is interested in 160-168 with smaller breast. I don't think there would be some legal issues on it because she will be tall enough as an adult. No one will judge her age only on the breast, right? Regardless of face, such height is quite safe in Aus and Europe. We manufactureres and TDF managers have talked about it long before and agreed that there is not any specific stardard. On the other hand, a mature face may lower the risk.

@NormalHuman I think I shall set a pre-buy price as deposit for this body. Heads will be still chosen from the current list. This combo will include some popular options like shrugging and a few more. But I consider if it is too early currently for the price. With promotion discount, the final price would be about $2500-2900 with 5-10 people in.
Actually I am more worrying about the resource for such a body. Pictures would be fine, but not the best choice.

@Colonel Angus How do you think of it? Is it your preference?

@justintime What I talk about is the body. This face.. I may try. Could I count you in?

@Mikael123 Bud, you are in, right?

@DexterQuest I remember you. Seems that you will in.

So next step for me is to show the 3D modeling of this body. Probably 5 people at least would be more persuative to boss, who still has no idea of it.

Sincerely,
Kevin

I'm also waiting to see what you come up with. Love hole placement, AND shape are a must see first. But about the pic you showed as an example (the censored one of the blonde), I feel a tiny bit more boob would be okay, and I think she could also stand to be a tiny bit less skinny. Also, not fond of the way her shoulders appear to be wider than her hips, but that could be just the camera angle. But, as I said earlier, hopefully you can work from a real girl of that height, preferably an actual cast. Otherwise, I'll just wait for a render.
Just to reiterate, placement of holes. and the shape of the labia and pubic area (gaping included) will be a huge factor. The fact that you guys still don't have finger skeletons, and a couple of other things that are available from the competition I am watching, is already a bit of a compromise.
Looking forward to some images, and your thoughts.

Sino-Mike · Post by **Sino-Mike** » Tue Jul 28, 2020 2:35 am

ILDoll wrote:Hi guys, you all have amazed me. I was absent for just two days and there have been so much comments! Thank you!

As the topic, purpose of this thread is kind of invitation for anyone who is interested in 160-168 with smaller breast. I don't think there would be some legal issues on it because she will be tall enough as an adult. No one will judge her age only on the breast, right?
Kevin

Wrong. Please read: "WARNING: To buyers of young looking dolls by TDF_Management" plus poll and survey posted here on cup size. IMO, if ILDOLL go ahead with the AA to cater to a few potential customers, it will make a bad business decision.