Fiery Redhead (New WM172B doll)

Endless War · Post by **Endless War** » Sat Nov 23, 2019 2:01 pm

Just amazing Mandos.
Beautiful representation.

Cubiko · Post by **Cubiko** » Sat Nov 23, 2019 2:25 pm

Thanks again everyone, she is indeed quite a presence.

@ZD, sure no problem. I would like to see Melissa

Here is a quick comparison photo of the three ladies that were standing beside each other. Sorry for it not being optimal, the 172B is leaning a bit forward and legs wide apart so she looks a bit shorter in this photo, but she is in fact just as tall as my big WM173 doll. Again I do love the 166C, but it does not win any realism-competition versus these two newer ladies. Also very interesting to see how versatile the #273 head is, just a little bit make up and some more cotton behind the eyes and she looks completely different.

Colonel Angus · Post by **Colonel Angus** » Sat Nov 23, 2019 2:40 pm

mandos wrote:Thanks again everyone, she is indeed quite a presence.

@ZD, sure no problem. I would like to see Melissa

Here is a quick comparison photo of the three ladies that were standing beside each other. Sorry for it not being optimal, the 172B is leaning a bit forward and legs wide apart so she looks a bit shorter in this photo, but she is in fact just as tall as my big WM173 doll. Again I do love the 166C, but it does not win any realism-competition versus these two newer ladies. Also very interesting to see how versatile the #273 head is, just a little bit make up and some more cotton behind the eyes and she looks completely different.

I'd love to see the 162e as an a-cup or b-cup. Her body shape (boobs excluded) is the most natural looking imo.

PDutus · Post by **PDutus** » Sat Nov 23, 2019 5:16 pm

Colonel Angus wrote:
mandos wrote:Thanks again everyone, she is indeed quite a presence.

@ZD, sure no problem. I would like to see Melissa

Here is a quick comparison photo of the three ladies that were standing beside each other. Sorry for it not being optimal, the 172B is leaning a bit forward and legs wide apart so she looks a bit shorter in this photo, but she is in fact just as tall as my big WM173 doll. Again I do love the 166C, but it does not win any realism-competition versus these two newer ladies. Also very interesting to see how versatile the #273 head is, just a little bit make up and some more cotton behind the eyes and she looks completely different.
I'd love to see the 162e as an a-cup or b-cup. Her body shape (boobs excluded) is the most natural looking imo.

I tend to agree with you, Colonel, but the new girl is certainly a stunner.

takikawa · Post by **takikawa** » Sat Nov 23, 2019 5:33 pm

I have to admit, I normally go for thicker dolls, but I can't deny that this doll hits my 3 mandatories quite well: manageable weight, very tall, and decent lovehole placement. She even has nice curves.

NO ONE IS EVEN CLOSE RIGHT NOW

I can't agree with that. The new 6ye 171cm looks nice and has better lovehole placement.

Mandos, thanks for sharing, especially the side by side photo. We need more of those!

Post by **Tommo10** » Sun Nov 24, 2019 1:19 am

She looks very impressive, tall and extremely sexy.
I only popped over here to type a quick PM, and your Fiery Redhead managed to drag me in. WM are certainly making choosing a doll very difficult, even I can't keep up.
Well, yesterday I ordered my 162E #266 in the Black Friday Sale, that made my list of three WM dolls down to two and today it's back up to three again. :haha4:

Thanks.

Tommo

Cubiko · Post by **Cubiko** » Sun Nov 24, 2019 1:55 am

Tommo10 wrote:Thanks.

Hey buddy, I do not know if you are thanking me or cursing me

PS! This redhead uses the same hairdresser as Ginger.

nicvncnt · Post by **nicvncnt** » Sun Nov 24, 2019 7:39 am

Colonel Angus wrote:I'd love to see the 162e as an a-cup or b-cup. Her body shape (boobs excluded) is the most natural looking imo.

That would be the WM162B which also has a more realistic waist. WM don't promote this doll for some reason but you can see pics on the vendor websites or in my girl Samantha's doll gallery. This doll has been listed as anything from an A cup to a D cup but you can see from the pics in her gallery that she's no more than a B cup.

Pip-Doll88 · Post by **Pip-Doll88** » Sun Nov 24, 2019 8:47 am

mandos wrote: Here is a quick comparison photo of the three ladies that were standing beside each other. Sorry for it not being optimal, the 172B is leaning a bit forward and legs wide apart so she looks a bit shorter in this photo, but she is in fact just as tall as my big WM173 doll. Again I do love the 166C, but it does not win any realism-competition versus these two newer ladies. Also very interesting to see how versatile the #273 head is, just a little bit make up and some more cotton behind the eyes and she looks completely different.

Nice comparision shot!

Wow such a contrast of difference between the bodies! I remember the 166C being amazing back then, looking here she does certainly seem to be on the less realistic side.
I do like the 172B alot actually, mainly for the height. Pretty realistic and not too thin. I might still ever so slightly prefer the 162E , i like the meatier ladies

Cant wait to see more of the 172B tho!

garriola83 · Post by **garriola83** » Sun Nov 24, 2019 10:21 am

Seeing all these pictures, I'm convinced this is my next TPE doll. I might have to sell a shorter doll to partly fund this new purchase. It's so sexy and just the right proportions. This doll might be what I've been looking for in a TPE doll all this time.

PDutus · Post by **PDutus** » Sun Nov 24, 2019 1:54 pm

garriola83 wrote:Seeing all these pictures, I'm convinced this is my next TPE doll. I might have to sell a shorter doll to partly fund this new purchase. It's so sexy and just the right proportions. This doll might be what I've been looking for in a TPE doll all this time.

I agree - she has a lot going for her. And I think she'd look nice alongside our JY175s

Cubiko · Post by **Cubiko** » Wed Nov 27, 2019 12:55 pm

Thanks

I actually agree with you, Pip. After having «landed» after the initial shock of seeing this lady in the flesh, and her presence, I keep coming back to the 162E body as being more to my taste, which is very individual of course.

More photos soon, with some doggy action - kinda curious to see how she performs in that position myself.

SteelWings · Post by **SteelWings** » Wed Nov 27, 2019 1:17 pm

I am filled with a mighty need to purchase a WM doll.

avante · Post by **avante** » Thu Nov 28, 2019 12:06 pm

That last re-posted pic is really nice; lovely figure. And also, again, want to say I really like you putting out these comparison shots; they're great for perspective. As clearly some dolls look great in general, but you better see her striking (either bad or good) features in these kinda shots. So the new model is like the 166C only bit thicker -tho same body style- and well taller obv.

Still agree too the 162E looks most realistic. For me also the tits could be smaller, but I do like how this model E's it's more in the breast volume than extreme standoff (ie wider tit but standing out less compared to more pointy boobs), as it fits the figure better. The one really major 'minus' I think to see when seeing the WM162E is that her back-to-front-at-belly- distance seems really thin...

Sp0ngeWorthy · Post by **Sp0ngeWorthy** » Thu Nov 28, 2019 11:30 pm

avante wrote:Still agree too the 162E looks most realistic. For me also the tits could be smaller, but I do like how this model E's it's more in the breast volume than extreme standoff (ie wider tit but standing out less compared to more pointy boobs), as it fits the figure better. The one really major 'minus' I think to see when seeing the WM162E is that her back-to-front-at-belly- distance seems really thin...

Agreed on both counts. I was a bit worried about the E size, but she's perfect. Slightly over filled handfuls. Very manageable and well built.

And the depth at the belly is indeed thin. Probably her only flaw body wise.