As I already pointed out the vaginal entry is not in the same plane as the thigh rear surface but 3 cm forward between the crotch. The picture view from behind give her placement a correct aspect but that is an optical illusion as the vaginal entry is not accessible as on a real woman.Maviarab wrote:Personally think the 166C placement is far more accurate to a real woman than the B. The B just looks all sorts of Chinese TPE wrong...
sexy la la wonderland 166C versus realistic 166B review
-
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 725
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 4:27 pm
- Contact:
Re: sexy la la wonderland 166C versus realistic 166B review
-
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 725
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 4:27 pm
- Contact:
Re: sexy la la wonderland 166C versus realistic 166B review
I almost forgot to mention that but that is very important as far as establishing confidence in the brand is concerned.
Should it be with my 168A and two smaller sizes bought last year or these two 166 (B and C) bought this year, WMdoll measurements are truly accurate. They prove to other brands that this is possible and should be done.
-
- Contributing Poster
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2021 11:22 pm
- Contact:
Re: sexy la la wonderland 166C versus realistic 166B review
Would be very appreciated
-
- Contributing Poster
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2021 8:11 pm
- Location: North East Indiana
- Contact: