Page 1 of 1
A closer look at the 161E vs the 165F
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2018 4:49 pm
by Booty Call Dolls
A couple things...
First, please forgive the photo quality
I took these a month or so ago
Second, this is the newer 165F cup and as you will see, she is far from a thin busty lady.
The lighter doll is the 161E cup, the darker is the 165F cup.
So let us get started
Jeff
Re: A closer look at the 161E vs the 165F
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2018 4:59 pm
by Booty Call Dolls
As you can see, the new 165F cup is alot closer in body style to the 161E cup than the previous 165F cup
Re: A closer look at the 161E vs the 165F
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2018 5:03 pm
by Booty Call Dolls
And of course, this is an important view as well
Re: A closer look at the 161E vs the 165F
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2018 5:05 pm
by Booty Call Dolls
Thank you for supporting 6YE.
Both these ladies have very nice figures, but beauty is in the eyes of the beholder.
BCD
Re: A closer look at the 161E vs the 165F
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 4:30 am
by FullHouse
Very informative, thanks a lot Jeff
Btw, are these insert or fixed vags?
Re: A closer look at the 161E vs the 165F
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 9:30 am
by Booty Call Dolls
Full house,
The 161E ,ZZ, is built in.
The other doll is an insert.
Jeff
Re: A closer look at the 161E vs the 165F
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 10:04 am
by Dollsampler
Hi jeff,
You know I have the old 165f version (38 kgs). I consider her as one of my best dolls as far as erotism and realism are concerned (my collection reached 24 dolls) However far from the best regarding stability and aspect when standing. Her breasts are more behaving like a D than a F cup.
However thanks to your pictures I can easily see that they modified the buttocks a lot and they thickened the thighs. One problem with the previous version with the sexy almost perpendicular connection between the lower buttocks and the thigh is that they needed to print furrows in the junction to try to avoid cracks.Despites these printed furrows my doll has already one buttock which begin to tear off from the thigh.She has not to worry because I learn hot welding a lot (the only good repairs on TPE IMO)
Basically IN AVERAGE non fat Young women have rather a junction of the buttocks with the thigh similar to the AYUMI ones (progressive) like they did here to the new 165F.
Nevertheless I like slim women and so I prefer the previous 165F version (IMO a hipsline 91cm is enough for a 165cm Young woman) AYUMI has 94-95cm for 172cm which is also gracefuly erotic.
Re: A closer look at the 161E vs the 165F
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 10:10 am
by Booty Call Dolls
DS,
Thank you for your thoughts.
It would be nice if they still offered the older version as well...
Jeff
Re: A closer look at the 161E vs the 165F
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2019 2:07 am
by ian85
How much do these dolls actually weigh?
Re: A closer look at the 161E vs the 165F
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2019 3:44 pm
by avante
Nice post; I always love to see some nice models besides (vs) each other. Gotta say both bodies look appealing to me! Kinda always had a thing for the 165F...so has this model officially been 'changed' ? And what has changed lol? Are there any official pics of the 'new' model?
Re: A closer look at the 161E vs the 165F
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2019 3:51 pm
by Booty Call Dolls
ian,
85 -90 lbs, ball park.
The older version were lighter.
Re: A closer look at the 161E vs the 165F
Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2019 12:07 pm
by Drips
what is the skin color of the 165f ? brown or tane