Page 1 of 1

158 vs 168?

Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2018 5:35 pm
by x3ana
Hello everyone. I'm interested in purchasing a WM doll but can't find any good information regarding the two bodies I've narrowed it down to. I have always liked the 168 body but the 158 also seems quite nice and being 10kg lighter also seems like it would be nice. Does anyone have both dolls and can compare? or does WM have a body comparison picture somewhere? Thank you.

Re: 158 vs 168?

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2018 6:03 am
by amytyl
The 158 being a favorite of mine, I can say that she's the closest to a real woman in terms of feel. Her inner thigh gap allows her to squeeze oh so perfectly from missionary and her butt is just the right size to not have flattened at all in the two years I've had her.

Re: 158 vs 168?

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2018 5:33 pm
by Dr Dollinger
I really like them both
But couldn't more agree with amytyl! +2 :thumbs_up:
After all the experience with different realistic shaped dolls - the WM158 is in terms of sexual attraction still my favorite
Nothing beats that perfect torso with those stunning boobs for me. In a tight shirt or blouse she rocks the house
I'm a sucker for broader shoulders and thicker arms - regarding this, she's a masterpiece


Image


Image


Image


Image

Image


Image


Image

Image
For more pics of the beautiful WM168 take a look here:
Panther68's legendary Anastasia thread
viewtopic.php?f=11&t=90964

Re: 158 vs 168?

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2018 6:11 pm
by Arthur1960
I heartily agree with other comments here, both dolls are beautiful works of art and I would have a 168 myself if I were a bit younger and fitter! But I'm comfortable with my gals being around the 34kg mark or less so the 158 fits nicely in this range and is still around 5' 2". My gal Athena is certainly the most noticeable of my 8 gals in 2" heels she stands at a decent height and as previously noted has realistically sized shoulders and a lovely torso so she looks good in everything I put her in, here's a couple of pics to demonstrate...

Re: 158 vs 168?

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2018 7:26 pm
by Panther68
Hey, Dollinger

Great to see you again. So hard to keep up on all the other threads here and shoot 3 dolls with another on the way. Still obsessed with it after 11 months. Those are some incredible face shots of the #15 head. Are those recent or from you catalog. Impressive. Great make up, something I have yet to conquer.

But I did want to chim in here, I do not have the 158, but I do have the 168E. She is the older version, no shrugging shoulders. The older model has more of a hour glass figure, while the newer one no so much and skinnier legs, so be aware of this, if you chose this model. Zippy81 has a thread on this that is a good read.

viewtopic.php?f=262&t=103239

Re: 158 vs 168?

Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2018 8:23 pm
by Dr Dollinger
Hey Chris,
Thanks for the nice words!
Yepp, these are some new shots. When I got this head (it was my very first one - like yours ) I wasn't able to make a good picture of her, which came close to what I was seeing. Very frustrating, because this face means a lot to me
Your amazing pictures always reminds me how beautiful and special head#15 is
So, I just gave it another try ... And yeah, now I'm happy :D
Panther68 wrote:So hard to keep up on all the other threads here and shoot 3 dolls with another on the way.
Absolutely! You can easy get lost with it. Wow, doll number 4!
Still obsessed with it after 11 months.
Great to hear that
Really exciting to see other people going that (multiple doll) way and hearing how you guys deal with it

This is insanely beautiful Arthur
Image
some more torso shots

Image


Image


Image


Image


Image


Image

One of the best WM158 threads is from avante. A lot of information there
viewtopic.php?f=215&t=85063

Re: 158 vs 168?

Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2018 8:53 pm
by Endless War
DOC!
Oh my those are some amazing shots! I absolutely love her lipstick as well.
Beautiful.

Re: 158 vs 168?

Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2018 9:51 pm
by DexterQuest
Are you talking about the 158 A-cup and the 168 A-cup? These are my two favorites. I love the breasts of the 158A and the rest of everything on the 168A especially the long limbs and tight butt. I can post more if you confirm which 158/168 you mean.

Re: 158 vs 168?

Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2018 3:17 am
by x3ana
Wow thank you guys so much for the wealth of information and pictures! it's really helping in my decision. I initially wanted a Climaxdoll 175, but it's quite expensive and so I checked out WM. I am interested in the 158D and the 168E specifically. I'm leaning towards the lighter weighted doll, but I do like the curves on the 168 and want a "womanly woman" so to speak, haha. Argh, it's so difficult to decide!

Re: 158 vs 168?

Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2018 8:07 am
by Pip-Doll88
I say go for the larger doll.

Re: 158 vs 168?

Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2018 8:30 am
by MIGuy1740
62 be! When you're both standing at the bar having cocktails, depending on how tall you are, you're either making eye contact all night or looking at her cleavage every once in awhile! Choose wisely my friend!

Re: 158 vs 168?

Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2018 12:36 pm
by Dave1592
All very pretty dolls, but I think the lighter weight of the 158 is a big plus!

Re: 158 vs 168?

Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2018 2:03 pm
by avante
Damn D, that last pic and the 3rd set from the one before that...she's looking like a succubus :P. Havent seen this head before I think. And nice to be referenced :D.

Can only speak on the 158D, but for me as this too was my 1st doll the lower weight was a must. And to this day I'd buy her again without a doubt! Lovely tits and overall nice slim but curvy figure.

Re: 158 vs 168?

Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2018 5:37 am
by u5er89
DexterQuest wm168/a doll looks amazing! I have WM158A and I’m thinking I’m going to get her a sister WM168A. Please please do you have more pictures of 158A and 168A together? Especially butt comparisons, legs and overall body photos? Many thanks!

Re: 158 vs 168?

Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2018 8:38 pm
by ColColt
Never had a 168 girl and after hefting the 160 doubt I ever will. The 158 D girl is near ideal in height and weight and them titties are second to none. Good size waist and not wasp and the hips/waist are more natural.

My WM158D girl with the #122 head and nice butt shot.