Page 5 of 8

Re: Iron Tech 168cm with Suzie Head Review

Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2018 4:33 pm
by Dollicious2
flying42 wrote:
blindwebster wrote:Are hollow breasts really superior to soft solid breasts? I actually think I would prefer solid, unless they are too hard.
Jeff recently posted a jiggle vid of another doll the 6Ye 161, with hollow breasts. They seem to behave similar to solid, with quick rebound and little give. It really depends on the softness of the manufacturer, just like the orifices: right for those on the small side, not so much if you're on the large side. I like them because you can be a bit more aggressive with them and they can be a durable fulcrum in doggy position. A small round cavity would be useful as a stable insertion for air modification in solid breasts, rather than thinner walls, which can sound hollow like a basketball from what I've read, and are more prone to damage and sagging over time. But larger hollow boobs when deflated are probably the closest to a RG in feel and movement. Smaller breasts don't move as much anyway, your mileage may vary.
Don't want to drag out the subject about hollow breast again and after all this is a review thread not a breasts debate thread but it's my experience that hollow breasts of any size feel better then solid breasts of any size.

Do you have experience with both kinds flying42?
Cheers
:glou:
DL2

Re: Iron Tech 168cm with Suzie Head Review

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2018 9:36 am
by Dollicious2
Okay...
Moving on to another subject here
The So called
Quick Connect Head
I hate this quick connect head thing, Every time I am moving her around in bed the head literally comes off her ...

What can be done to keep the head on ???
Please Advise !

This will not do at all and I just want the old screw design back

Might have been a good idea for some but this thing fails big time.

It's so bad I am just going to pack her back in the box and forget she even here.
Thought I'd enjoy her company till next one gets here but head coming of when I move her Every Time is
One
Huge
Turn off...

I don't remember anyone complaining about the quick connect head design so maybe I have a bad one idk...

I can't recall any thread in the negative for quick connect...

I need some kind of an adaptor or something to end the head falling off???

Is there an adaptor for this???

DL2

Re: Iron Tech 168cm with Suzie Head Review

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2018 4:22 pm
by Dollsampler
Hello dollicious,
Interesting to learn from you that the quick head connecting system could be such a problem.Personaly as I have a lot of heads I request the screw system whenever it is possible when I order a new doll.6YE for example supplied my 165f with the premium skeleton but with a screw head connecting system instead of their standard quick-connect.

I also ordered my IRONTECHDOLL with a screw system in order to be able to use spare heads but I think they dont make it with their upgraded skeleton.
I am quite fed up about the upgraded skeleton here and there because it complicate too much the use of the dolls in standing position.

Re: Iron Tech 168cm with Suzie Head Review

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2018 4:34 pm
by Dollicious2
Hi DS
I love new skeleton chassis but this quick connect head got to go , I will contact Leonard and ask if the can use the screw connect at the neck.

Re: Iron Tech 168cm with Suzie Head Review

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2018 11:25 pm
by ThePope
The videos were very helpful, thanks for posting them.

Re: Iron Tech 168cm with Suzie Head Review

Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2018 4:04 am
by Dollicious2
Good News
The new doll is ready and soon I'll have photo & video of her with proof she hollow breasts and hopefully got her back done so that the bumps are no longer there.
We will see soon !

As for the head issue I will see how this new doll head connect performs and if head comes loosened easily I will be forced to get an adaptor and just use WM head for this doll.

This is no problem as I wanted to do so anyways and I currently have a WM head 200 Ana De Armas in shipping as I speak.

You guessed it right folks
The plan is to go for the perfect replica of Ana De Armas here.
Wish me luck finding or making the correct adaptor for this to become a reality.

DL2

Re: Iron Tech 168cm with Suzie Head Review

Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2018 4:45 am
by Dollicious2
Strange thing is sometimes head comes off and other times it stays on like a champ...

I think there is a learning process to go threw here with this unfamiliar head connect.

I noticed as long as you don't shake the head or apply and downward force on the head the connector will not come loose , I am guessing that if I want the fit to be real hard core snug I can try some things like... idk umm pipe tape ? :lol:
I really like this Suzie head from IronTech
And !
They are soon to announce new heads that are really gonna knock your heads off (no pun intended?)
:mrgreen:
Can't wait to see these new faces from IronTech
DL2

Re: Iron Tech 168cm with Suzie Head Review

Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2018 5:07 am
by Dollicious2
ThePope wrote:The videos were very helpful, thanks for posting them.
Your welcome Pope :)
There will be an new review for the doll set to arrive in a week or so.
Not sure what I'll call it but I will probably call it IronTech168cm Review Number 2

Re: Iron Tech 168cm with Suzie Head Review

Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2018 5:18 am
by omoxiluoyi
Wow, it's amazing to see what you're posting.I think it's perfect.

Re: Iron Tech 168cm with Suzie Head Review

Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2018 5:50 am
by Dollicious2
Happy to report she is finished with hollow breasts this time around
Here is a nice video IronTech made as proof they are indeed hollow now
DL2

Re: Iron Tech 168cm with Suzie Head Review

Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2018 9:16 am
by Dollicious2
Olinka & Yaelina
Intimacy Defined

Re: Iron Tech 168cm with Suzie Head Review

Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2018 2:34 pm
by ts10208
DL2,
Congrats on your hollow breast quest.
Kudos to Leonard and Irontech for listening and making it right.
This has got to be one of THE top TPE dolls made at this time.

Re: Iron Tech 168cm with Suzie Head Review

Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2018 3:23 pm
by Dollicious2
ts10208 wrote:DL2,
Congrats on your hollow breast quest.
Kudos to Leonard and Irontech for listening and making it right.
This has got to be one of THE top TPE dolls made at this time.
Yeah it's Very nice indeed ts

Hey ts does her head come loose sometimes when moving her on the bed , I can't even imagine having any kind of rough sex with a doll that's head rolls off with the slightest shaking of her body...
I can't wait to get an adaptor for WM heads...
Then I will have to figure out how to keep Suzie head from popping off as I like her face.

NOT A FAN OF QUICK CONNECT PIN NECK DEVICE
It's Horrible
Then there are the horrible bumps on her upper backbone too...
Oh well always gotta be something wrong on every doll out there lol
DL2

Re: Iron Tech 168cm with Suzie Head Review

Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 3:50 pm
by Dollsampler
Thank you for the pictures of AYUMI body in doggy style.Very realistic buttocks like the real AYUMI
However apparently the anal hole is positionned where the vaginal hole should be (at the level of the lower buttock crease).The anal hole should be 4 to 5 cm upper in the crevice of the buttocks.Most brands make dolls that way (skeleton in the way?). In my collection of 11 dolls only my DH168 161cm cup C is anatomically correct.That make a change in the attractiveness of the body.
P1020229.JPG
P1020229.JPG (5.59 MiB) Viewed 1989 times

Re: Iron Tech 168cm with Suzie Head Review

Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:36 pm
by irontechdoll
Thanks for letting us know the issue of the quick connection problems. We will consider provide screw face connection for upgraded skelton. As for anus issue, we know this all the time. It is the normal issue in TPE doll indulstry. While we keep improving on this. I will keep you informed in the following weeks.
Best regards
Leonard