XTDOLL is about to release a new body 164CM, full of details and features

[Jugo]

The problem is not the sculpt, it's how far forward and how far down the hip joint is placed within the pelvic area. This is what determines where the butt hole ends up when she sits.

[PartThree]

I think that when I originally ordered it, was before you did, and it was already supposed to be the newer body. Something went wrong with my order, and then I asked for one more change which delayed it further, but I believe that even the original was going to be the newer body. Obviously, XTdoll will have the answer...

I inquired and got a vague "is in production, thank you" answer. Not as informative as the rep I had with my Thanksgiving purchase.

[XTDoll]

Our staff is also sorting out the various data of 164cm. In fact, what I am most concerned about is the weight. I hope it can be controlled within 30kg.

[manobon]

Can anyone help me find out if there is any problem with the design location of the LHP?

Actually, I would have to say - considering that the cavities/canals in sex dolls don't angle as much as they do in people - the cavity entrances would Feel more realistic if they were higher back (because then you would feel the butt cheeks surrounding them from any 'behind' position)

See attached -
sketch-1703736446349.jpg

If they did this then missionary would be impossible.

I think missionary/'front facing' positions would require moving the doll's hips up a bit more, but actually provide a more realistic feeling experience

Of course, the best solution would be more accurate internal cavity angles and realistic LHP for the openings, but I don't know if that's currently possible, with the way the doll skeletons/foam/implants are used

[XTDoll]

I think that when I originally ordered it, was before you did, and it was already supposed to be the newer body. Something went wrong with my order, and then I asked for one more change which delayed it further, but I believe that even the original was going to be the newer body. Obviously, XTdoll will have the answer...

I inquired and got a vague "is in production, thank you" answer. Not as informative as the rep I had with my Thanksgiving purchase.

Hello! PartThree，Please provide me with your order number and I will assist you in following up and sharing progress information.

[XTDoll]

I will share my first-hand information. My colleague informed me about the body weight of 164cm: 29Kg (within my acceptable weight range). I am also considering whether to further upgrade it.

[serotta]

I will share my first-hand information. My colleague informed me about the body weight of 164cm: 29Kg (within my acceptable weight range). I am also considering whether to further upgrade it.

That's quite a bit heavier than your 163F. I'm wondering if this is a bbw sculpt. It's hard to tell from the photo. Do you know the measurements yet?

[jeep2639]

I will share my first-hand information. My colleague informed me about the body weight of 164cm: 29Kg (within my acceptable weight range). I am also considering whether to further upgrade it.

That's quite a bit heavier than your 163F. I'm wondering if this is a bbw sculpt. It's hard to tell from the photo. Do you know the measurements yet?

I don't know. From pictures taken by others who already received the 163F, it looks like she is around 27kg by herself. Also, remember to add the weight of the head...
I don't know what the cutoff weight is. I know that I couldn't deal with my 112lb doll. Come to think of it, I don't even know if she was 112lb including the head, or without it... She was heavy.
29Kg is 64lb. The head would be another 5lb? So, still under 70lb. Is that the cutoff weight? There are many dolls over 75lb. I think I would have been fine up to 75lb.
I almost bought a 158B FanReal doll when I saw XTdoll's 163F, and all the innovation that comes from them, and I totally forgot about FanReal... The 158B was going to weigh more than the 163F.
Anyway, just my random thoughts. I'll update you once I get my 163F.

[PartThree]

I think that when I originally ordered it, was before you did, and it was already supposed to be the newer body. Something went wrong with my order, and then I asked for one more change which delayed it further, but I believe that even the original was going to be the newer body. Obviously, XTdoll will have the answer...

I inquired and got a vague "is in production, thank you" answer. Not as informative as the rep I had with my Thanksgiving purchase.

Hello! PartThree，Please provide me with your order number and I will assist you in following up and sharing progress information.

That's kind of you. I have sent you a private message with the order number.

[serotta]

I will share my first-hand information. My colleague informed me about the body weight of 164cm: 29Kg (within my acceptable weight range). I am also considering whether to further upgrade it.

That's quite a bit heavier than your 163F. I'm wondering if this is a bbw sculpt. It's hard to tell from the photo. Do you know the measurements yet?

I don't know. From pictures taken by others who already received the 163F, it looks like she is around 27kg by herself. Also, remember to add the weight of the head...
I don't know what the cutoff weight is. I know that I couldn't deal with my 112lb doll. Come to think of it, I don't even know if she was 112lb including the head, or without it... She was heavy.
29Kg is 64lb. The head would be another 5lb? So, still under 70lb. Is that the cutoff weight? There are many dolls over 75lb. I think I would have been fine up to 75lb.
I almost bought a 158B FanReal doll when I saw XTdoll's 163F, and all the innovation that comes from them, and I totally forgot about FanReal... The 158B was going to weigh more than the 163F.
Anyway, just my random thoughts. I'll update you once I get my 163F.

Yes, there's always a bit of uncertainty involving weight. I just assumed apples-to-apples since it was from the same source. They say 25 kg for the 163F, and 29 kg for the 164C. That's a pretty sizable increase, considering that the boobs dropped three cup sizes. It was unexpected, so I asked. I suppose we'll all know soon enough.

[horrorhorry]

Can anyone help me find out if there is any problem with the design location of the LHP?

So I see some editing done to show the placement change, so... why not try to show what i like, I did change the anal hole position a bit and gave her a visually deeper ass crack and slight cheeks to her bottom because it fits her big ass more and her body style in my opinion, also see how nice and snug the anal hole is now .. your rod/stick whatever... will be nicely massaged by the gell ass on entering

[DollCommander]

Can anyone help me find out if there is any problem with the design location of the LHP?

I really hope you haven't committed to this body by finalizing the mold prior to asking for feedback.

You want to be aiming for something like this.

Screenshot_20231225-210903~2.png (273.2 KiB) Viewed 433 times

Also don't forget to make sure the cavity/tunnel follows a nuetral (straight in) angle while the legs are bent at the hip, otherwise it will be unuseable in either missionary (if angled towards butt) or doggy (if angled towards stomach) positions. Also, make sure the actual entrance (second vaginal hole, leading into the cavity/tunnel) is appropriately sized for silicone in order to prevent pain and/or tearing. The primary vaginal hole (larger of the two in your photos) is about what it should be; and just as your photos show, tightness can be adjusted by the user by simply either opening or closing the legs.

I think XT's enthusiasm for innovation is admirable, but really..manufacturers (not just XT) need to master these basic design features first before moving on to other things. Why are dolls with poor LHP and painful/easily torn holes even a thing at this stage?

[lexico]

Can anyone help me find out if there is any problem with the design location of the LHP?

So I see some editing done to show the placement change, so... why not try to show what i like, I did change the anal hole position a bit and gave her a visually deeper ass crack and slight cheeks to her bottom because it fits her big ass more and her body style in my opinion, also see how nice and snug the anal hole is now .. your rod/stick whatever... will be nicely massaged by the gell ass on entering

I'm impressed that XT is listening, and I'm impressed by the edited photo! Yes, why can't manufacturers do this? Is there a reason due to molds and/or silicone processes?

[DollCommander]

Here is a very reasonably priced TPE doll from a relatively low cost manufacturer. They got LHP right You can enter the doll easily from both missionary (front) and doggy (behind), no need to compromise. The second photo is with legs spread..look, no crazy gaping vagina hole. But don't be mistaken, the hole isn't small..it's actually very well sized as can be seen in the third photo. This is what could be accomplished with proper engineering and how all dolls should be at this time. Why is it not?

file-130.jpg (137.53 KiB) Viewed 397 times

file-139~2.jpg (128.9 KiB) Viewed 397 times

file-132.jpg (174.5 KiB) Viewed 397 times

[Aexpin007]

Greetings,

Looks good, which raises my main question these days... Is this doll good for photography or intimacy?

They must not know that answer or ignoring your question?