Page 25 of 29

Re: GYNOID Tech

Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 1:09 pm
by PDutus
justintime wrote:My Model 9 weighs 71 pounds not the 57 pounds as advertised.
This sort of statistic is worrying, but alas all too common in the doll world. I am currently looking at options for a higher end doll that will be light enough to take out and about in the car for photoshoots as well as being nice in bed. I am particularly looking at Gynoid and Xycolo, but by the time I am in a position financially to pull the trigger, there may well be other options available.

The Gynoid Model 10 is lovely and has an advertised weight of 36Kg. Allow a variation of +/- 2Kg, but if it turned out to be 40Kg plus...

I bought a Sino 161 partly on the basis of the advertised weight of 33-35Kg, and had hopes that she would therefore be light enough to carry down to my car and take out for photoshoots. But she tips the scales at 41Kg!!

Re: GYNOID Tech

Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 2:33 pm
by haremlover
PDutus wrote: I bought a Sino 161 partly on the basis of the advertised weight of 33-35Kg, and had hopes that she would therefore be light enough to carry down to my car and take out for photoshoots. But she tips the scales at 41Kg!!
Shipping companies really should be asked not to allow our ladies to have access to the First Class food on their travels.

Best wishes

Harem

Re: GYNOID Tech

Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 5:37 pm
by PDutus
haremlover wrote:
PDutus wrote: I bought a Sino 161 partly on the basis of the advertised weight of 33-35Kg, and had hopes that she would therefore be light enough to carry down to my car and take out for photoshoots. But she tips the scales at 41Kg!!
Shipping companies really should be asked not to allow our ladies to have access to the First Class food on their travels.

Best wishes

Harem
I reckon she was stuffing her face long before she boarded the plane, train or whatever in China...

Re: GYNOID Tech

Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 5:49 pm
by Mikael123
Hmm, that seems a hefty inaccuracy in weight difference. How on earth can they be that far out?

Re: GYNOID Tech

Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 6:18 pm
by PDutus
Goodness knows! I weighed her three times on two different machines.

Re: GYNOID Tech

Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 7:18 pm
by Doll Master
Colonel Angus wrote:So, D-cups or larger,...... again. Disappointing.
This is really starting to bug me. Gynoid seems to have a strong aversion to making B or C cups.

This is kind of strange considering that most Asian women don't have large breasts. Also, it seems
like GT doesn't want to make a truly youthful body. I would rather they make a B or C cup girl that
looks 20 years old than keep on making these models in a similar style.

The realism has truly been perfected, but there is not enough variety, especially for my preferences.

Re: GYNOID Tech

Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 7:25 pm
by silicon
She is eating to many pork pie,s , Harem try locking the fridge..

Re: GYNOID Tech

Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 8:37 pm
by Mr Consistency
Mikael123 wrote:Hmm, that seems a hefty inaccuracy in weight difference. How on earth can they be that far out?
Hmmm... I suppose that the inner core material (near the skelly) and the outer material weren't in the correct proportion?

Paging tech support!

Re: GYNOID Tech

Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 9:14 pm
by Mikael123
Mr Consistency wrote:
Mikael123 wrote:Hmm, that seems a hefty inaccuracy in weight difference. How on earth can they be that far out?
Hmmm... I suppose that the inner core material (near the skelly) and the outer material weren't in the correct proportion?

Paging tech support!
Yes, that could be true. And if that's the case then it's not a very confidence inspiring thing for potential buyers... what is it saying about their quality control? Things like this are worrying. I can understand up to a 1kg either way difference, but over 5kg or more? Hmm..

Re: GYNOID Tech

Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 9:28 pm
by garriola83
There's a virgin Model 9 up in the For Sale section if you are interested. Too small for me, but others might like her.
viewtopic.php?f=128&t=130216

Re: GYNOID Tech

Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 9:31 pm
by Colonel Angus
Doll Master wrote:
Colonel Angus wrote:So, D-cups or larger,...... again. Disappointing.
This is really starting to bug me. Gynoid seems to have a strong aversion to making B or C cups.
Or heaven forbid, ... *dramatic music* ..... an A-cup.
The general body shape otherwise is fine with me. I'm actually more interested in seeing an A/B-cup that isn't short or skinny, as most manufacturers seem to think small breasts=short and petite, which is markedly untrue in reality.

Re: GYNOID Tech

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2020 11:01 am
by Cloudclimax
New head on twitter today :D
Wow

Re: GYNOID Tech

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2020 12:58 pm
by garriola83
Cloudclimax wrote:New head on twitter today :D
Wow
I really quite like this head, probably my favorite now.

Re: GYNOID Tech

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2020 1:03 pm
by justintime
garriola83 wrote:
Cloudclimax wrote:New head on twitter today :D
Wow
I really quite like this head, probably my favorite now.
Me too , I saw this on Twitter, Eric had told me one was on it's way. Another beauty from Gynoid.

Re: GYNOID Tech

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2020 1:12 pm
by Nescio50
I wish I was that butterfly :B-fly:

And I love her looks 8)