Checking this topic again after some time, LOL...
btw, first of all, meanwhile I added a vote for "single and doll owner". There is nothing that makes me fit in there, other than technically, I'm still single and I have a doll, which isn't much as for what the category means. But there's even less proving I don't fit into this category, at least technically, so...
whatever makes the majority round here happy, I vote for it...
I didn't intend to hijack this thread with speculations about "basic requirements"...
but...
...
fuji wrote:Vanessa wrote:Bianca wrote:The "basic requirement" for
single is to NOT have a relationship at the time and the basic requirement for "
WITH DOLL" is to own a doll
I doubt that you understood what I wanted to insinuate with "basic requirement".
Never mind.
Maybe this "basic requirement" wich most of us are so proud of?
Anyway, despite the changes, you're still single and a doll owner for the moment... Even if you're in a particular situation, that doesn't really fit with the majority in this category... But I understand your point of view (well... I guess... If I've made no mistake in the interpretation of this famous "basic requirement", of course!!
).
pulchri-dude wrote:So soon to be losing "basic requirement" means there can be no fitting or logical "real" doll owner category, as if there aren't any
(faux) female lesbian owners of female dolls?
They appear to think they are having fun without having to lose a "basic requirement"
http://www.tube8.com/shemale/bella-donn ... es-/37861/
Warning naturally the aboves is
zoinks gender bending
Time to down the flaxseed oil & Dr. Lin's cock doubling Chinese herbs - they're better hung than me
Before speculations get weirder... I can do an "official global sticky announcement thread" about my situation and all types of "basic requirements" later on when the time is right. For now, everyone having to speculate can just send me a p.m.