Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
- Pussy69
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2023 1:29 pm
- Location: North Carolina, United States
- Contact:
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
Doll's Castle 150cm K-cup Review viewtopic.php?p=2415314#p2415314
6Ye 161cm J-cup Review viewtopic.php?p=2442140#p2442140
YL Doll 158cm I-cup Review viewtopic.php?p=2481808#p2481808
Get beautiful dolls with great discounts & affordable promotions here @ https://betterlovedoll.com/sales
- setevoltas
- Super Moderator
- Posts: 8496
- Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2018 3:03 am
- Contact:
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
Yeah, I know this comes off as another "bad LHP" thread but I wouldn't have bothered if I didn't see the potential. I don't know the whole DollsCastle story but I appreciate that someone here seems willing to take a design "risk" more than occasionally. Lots of brands are keeping it safe over the past year with lightweight dolls, cute twenty-something faces, etc. Meanwhile you got DC giving us aliens, furries, and an attempt at a thicc ass Latina.
I'm in, hell maybe they'll even give us an FBB before the end of the year.
- horrorhorry
- Active Member
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2018 2:00 pm
- Contact:
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
already posted the edit I did on de bad LHP topic ... only to grind it in some more until the get sick of it...
here it is again ....
.
. .
.
please take this seriously on all upcoming doll releases at least .. and maybe consider fixing/ updating this one
- OmegaDrill
- Active Poster
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 11:00 am
- Contact:
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
-
- Active Member
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 2:46 pm
- Contact:
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
They're certainly not a company that shies away from a challenge, but have not gone into much detail to sell themselves.
Let's see if they address the LHP, as others have done, if so I agree with others here this doll is heading up to the top of my list.
- setevoltas
- Super Moderator
- Posts: 8496
- Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2018 3:03 am
- Contact:
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
I think we're up to ten people in this thread alone who would either buy or seriously consider buying with the right LHP. That's telling you something Allum!
- cycleingking
- Doll Mentor
- Posts: 1020
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2022 12:57 am
- Location: Middle of America engulfed by mistresses
- Contact:
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
Yes please Allum, address the only flaw [LHP] with this design for the win!
Passionate about ROS, LHP and Silicone
Mistresses
-
- Contributing Poster
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:13 am
- Contact:
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
But I absolutely agree with everyone hear that her LHP should be spot on, I wouldn’t buy her either right now with where it’s positioned at the moment
So yeah if they get the LHP right and offer her in TPE as well like Starpery does I’d absolutely buy this doll
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
Dolls Castle 150K
ZX160J,
FJ 145,
WM164J, WM150M
HR164,
JY159,
LushDoll 153E
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
- setevoltas
- Super Moderator
- Posts: 8496
- Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2018 3:03 am
- Contact:
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
It's the million dollar question in doll land. Seems like a combination of old design habits, missionary preference, and some technical hurdles that not every brand seems to have learned how to get around.
This instance was disappointing since DollsCastle has shown the ability in the past to get this right. Odd that they backtracked here, but maybe it was because of a lack of experience in silicone.
This is also a good read:
viewtopic.php?p=2534567#p2534567
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
And on the subject of you can't have a thick booty and correct placement-
well I 'think' I can see how that'd be a problem but I can think of a solution too. Design moulds with their legs splayed upwards. But that's probably undesireable due to the extra space it would take up I guess? And I don't know what I'm talking about to be honest anyway, I just guess.
But sorry, it means enough to me to have to pass, unless there's modification
-
- Active Member
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 2:46 pm
- Contact:
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
- setevoltas
- Super Moderator
- Posts: 8496
- Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2018 3:03 am
- Contact:
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
I'm saving a spot too.skra-snarker wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2024 6:39 pm I'm holding back my next doll purchase to see if they can get this right.
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
I wonder would elimination of the anus entirely allow the vagina to be placed accurately. From your picture if looks like the anus is exactly where the vagina should be. I mean I would gladly forego having the anus if it meant correct placementsetevoltas wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2024 3:13 pm Hello DollsCastle! Several of us were excited to see your new silicone doll release, as it fills a need for a thick, very muscular legged doll without overly large breasts. However, you missed the mark badly on the the doll's LHP. I have attached an edited image in the hopes that you will correct this for future ass oriented dolls, especially in silicone releases, since post-purchase modifications are difficult and cost-prohibitive with silicone.
DC153_improved.jpg
For reference, the placement shown on the left is already in use on your 153 I cup TPE doll. We are confused why an older design was chosen for this doll.
Since in my experience attempting to "correct" LHP on existing sculpts does not work well, I will just put this here in the hopes it is considered for your next design. I am a fan of your brand and hope you will take this into consideration.
Thanks!
-Sete