Can Anyone Elaborate on Irontech Weight Reduction Status?
Can Anyone Elaborate on Irontech Weight Reduction Status?
Two TDF members recently purchased dolls that ended up being much lighter than they expected. One was a 163B and the other was a 167. Irontech's website lists these dolls at 30 kg + head. However, every vendor site I checked lists them at 36-37 kg. I also found this situation on two other dolls - the 159 and 165. It appears that, at a bare minimum, these four dolls have been weight reduced. The 169 was introduced with a reduced weight, so that would be a fifth.
The status of the other silicone dolls is unclear. The old weight is still displayed at Irontech's site and at every vendor site, but that doesn't necessarily mean that these dolls haven't been weight reduced. It would be great to get an official summary of the weight reduction status on the remaining silicone dolls, particularly the 164 and 168.
Re: Can Anyone Elaborate on Irontech Weight Reduction Status?
-
- Active Member
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 8:52 pm
Re: Can Anyone Elaborate on Irontech Weight Reduction Status?
- SimonSays7
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 814
- Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2016 1:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Can Anyone Elaborate on Irontech Weight Reduction Status?
First company that achieves a good soft doll 160cm or taller (with a normal or curvy figure) that weighs under 28kg and costs less than $2.5k, wins GOLD!
Re: Can Anyone Elaborate on Irontech Weight Reduction Status?
Im still not sure if mine has WR. When purchased the weight said more then the site does now so I think they did change it. Search options on Irontech for a diagram with weights. I believe my next does have WR but we shall see.serotta wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2024 1:50 pm Irontech has been rolling out weight reduction in their silicone dolls.
Two TDF members recently purchased dolls that ended up being much lighter than they expected. One was a 163B and the other was a 167. Irontech's website lists these dolls at 30 kg + head. However, every vendor site I checked lists them at 36-37 kg. I also found this situation on two other dolls - the 159 and 165. It appears that, at a bare minimum, these four dolls have been weight reduced. The 169 was introduced with a reduced weight, so that would be a fifth.
The status of the other silicone dolls is unclear. The old weight is still displayed at Irontech's site and at every vendor site, but that doesn't necessarily mean that these dolls haven't been weight reduced. It would be great to get an official summary of the weight reduction status on the remaining silicone dolls, particularly the 164 and 168.
Current: viewtopic.php?t=178506
First version: viewtopic.php?t=173583
Interested in IronTech? - https://www.irontechdoll.com/?sld=carycme - carycme10 for 10% off
167cm S39 ITSRS WR 60kg UltraSoft silicone
159cm E silicone Hedy Starpery - Darla
viewtopic.php?t=174942
Newer: viewtopic.php?t=179212
Re: Can Anyone Elaborate on Irontech Weight Reduction Status?
Yes! I've been suggesting the idea of a design sweet spot for about a year. Glad someone else gets it.SimonSays7 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2024 5:26 pm Let the weight-reduction Olympics continue.
First company that achieves a good soft doll 160cm or taller (with a normal or curvy figure) that weighs under 28kg and costs less than $2.5k, wins GOLD!
The 163B nearly got there but it's a little too heavy in the waist and hips. My best guess at the winning formula is 162C or 163B, under bust 68, waist 60, hips 89.
Re: Can Anyone Elaborate on Irontech Weight Reduction Status?
https://www.irontechdoll.com/roadmap/
- irontechdoll
- Manufacturer
- Posts: 1682
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 3:30 am
- Contact:
Re: Can Anyone Elaborate on Irontech Weight Reduction Status?
Service: service@irontechdoll.com
Website: http://www.irontechdoll.com
10% OFF CODE ON OFFICIAL WEBSITE: Bailey
At the Heart of Irontech Doll, Beats a Passion for Your Pleasure.
Our dedication to craftsmanship, customization, and customer satisfaction sets us apart, offering
an elevated and personalized experience to those seeking companionship and intimacy through love dolls.
Re: Can Anyone Elaborate on Irontech Weight Reduction Status?
Thank you for the quick response, Irontech. Some additional clarification would be helpful. As far as I know, the 168 has always been 36 kg + head. Likewise, the 164 at 40 kg + head appears to be a non-reduced weight.irontechdoll wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2024 10:40 pm Greater softness could potentially compromise durability and longevity. While this aspect hasn't been dismissed outright, further diligent investigation is required.
Should buyers expect these dolls to be reduced in the near future, or has the weight reduction work been concluded for now? Thanks.
Re: Can Anyone Elaborate on Irontech Weight Reduction Status?
So you know, i would still want the softer option even if it was more delicateirontechdoll wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2024 10:40 pm Greater softness could potentially compromise durability and longevity. While this aspect hasn't been dismissed outright, further diligent investigation is required.
- ArcanePath
- Active Poster
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2023 9:14 am
- Contact: