PHOTOS NEEDED OF 170 showing Vaginal placement

Post by **Booty Call Dolls** » Wed Jan 22, 2020 5:54 pm

Hi,
I gather Sandro will have on soon, but until then....

Post by **Dollstudio** » Thu Jan 23, 2020 8:42 am

Hi,

maybe this helps:

: unboxing-xycolo-xc-170f-yinan-head-7332-dollstudio.jpg (491.4 KiB) Viewed 1871 times

Sandro

Post by **Booty Call Dolls** » Thu Jan 23, 2020 9:30 am

Hi,
It sure does.
Thanks
Jeff

wr450x · Post by **wr450x** » Fri Jan 24, 2020 1:57 am

That's disappointing, the 170 vagina appears to be too far forward to fully engage from behind. That would explain why their published photos don't show vagina shots from behind.

This photo of the Xycolo 163cm C-cup shows a more natural vagina / anus placement. It appears Xycolo got the correct vagina placement for their 153cm and 163cm, so why is their newer 170cm F-cup misplaced?

The Gynoid Tech dolls appear to have the best vagina placement for all their models from published photos.

PDutus · Post by **PDutus** » Fri Jan 24, 2020 2:00 am

wr450x wrote:That's disappointing, the 170 vagina appears to be too far forward to fully engage from behind.

This photo of the Xycolo 163cm C-cup shows a more natural vagina / anus placement. It appears Xycolo got the correct vagina placement for their 153cm and 163cm, so why is their newer 170cm F-cup misplaced?

The Gynoid Tech dolls appear to have the best vagina placement for all their models from published photos.

I thought the 170 was their first, not their newest?

Post by **Dollstudio** » Fri Jan 24, 2020 9:30 am

@wr450x: If the doll does not have an anal canal, you have much more space to place the vaginal canal.

@PDutus: Yes, Body A (170 cm) was Xycolo's first doll. The latest is Body D (163 cm).

Sandro