Dollicious2 wrote:I gotta say as an owner of the original I am not pleased with the results of the vagina and anus on this new moulding but I do see some good things as she is packing a slightly larger buttocks and seems her arms look a bit better being a little shorter.
As for the height appearance that could be an error in the way this doll being compared as it's back is arched while the others not and the shoulders not set as high I believe also.
I told everyone the vagina was fine exactly way it was placed on the doll and all that needed changed was the neck to head design and get them bumps off the back but had some characters saying the vagina not anatomical correct... Oh well I tried to save the vag but others won out now it is what it is.
All in all it is still a fantastic looking doll but they should get the skin tone right when you order light tan it should never be this dark.
DL2
Hi dollicious,
The new model is sexier than before. I agree with you on that.
However the silhouette look (unlike AYUMI) heavy bottomed with buttocks at a lower level, the legs are 4_5cm shorter the doll is 3 cm shorter and the weight is now 47kgs.The sculpt is also less inprinted and the body in relation to the sculpt details and the holes gapping resemble more to the 170 just reviewed on SM FORUM. These are drawbacks IMO.
But the height difference as you can see on the picture back to back is due to a decrease of 4-5 cm in the legs inner thigh lenght.On the picture both bodies have their feet on the ground but are partially hanged (on my PATIENT LIFTER boom)The exagerated straight back on the original AYUMI body is due to a problem with the old skeleton and the height difference you see in the way of the neck connecter nut is 6cm in fact not 3cm.The arched back appearance of the new model has another component beeing the higher volume of the buttock (1.5cm more in total thickness) However the net real height difference taking the arched back effect out is mainly due to the legs and is around 3cm as indicated in my measurements.It is clearly visible on most pictures that the legs are shorter.
I think that reducing the 171-172cm height of AYUMI to 168-169 is not a poroblem in itself provided the downscaling dont change the silhouette. Here they took the difference in the legs while the torso remains the same. They should have taken 1.5cm in the legs and 1.5 cm in the torso to keep the body ratios intact.Had they done that correct downscaling they could have won up to one kg in weight at least.
You are right the new model is in tan color altough I ordered light tan but everything has gone wrong with this order, including the fact that IRT did not deliver factory pictures to me before shipping but only a video of a light tan doll which was not that one.I also asked a piece of TPE which was missing.
Hi fullhouse,
You are not the only one to prefer a sexier body but as some said AYUMI was a very rare model (hence looking like a real woman ) with body average realistic ratios available in the market while the new body can be found (have a look at SM170 review for example) by dozen. You are fully right regarding the genitals appearance but the new model is far far easier and more exciting for penetration in back position (standing, doggy ..etc).To arrange an anatomically correct entry on a doll body is really a paramount improvement IMO but it should not be made at the expense of realistic looking genitals and anal hole when legs are taken apart.