Coverdoll
www.realdoll.com
Coverdoll

My Little Lupe's 4th week photo show

The dolls manufactured by Abyss Creations in the likeness of Adult Film stars officially licensed through Wicked Pictures.

Moderator: TJ_Foxx

User avatar
kharn
Site Owners Group
Site Owners Group
Posts: 8958
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2001 12:00 am
Location: CoverDoll
Contact:

Re: My Little Lupe's 4th week photo show

Post by kharn »

Wow! what a little stunner, great photos :D
Image 
 Click to go to Coverdoll

User avatar
dollyforme
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Posts: 662
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:00 am
Contact:

Re: My Little Lupe's 4th week photo show

Post by dollyforme »

I'm sure that we'll be seeing many more Lupe dolls in the future. The 60lbs is the deal maker for many would be doll buyers. I see many are just waiting for their Lupe to arrive or are saving up to buy one. I hope Abyss doesn't wear out their molds making all of them!

:mrgreen:
Bisexual Gals do it better!!!!!!!

User avatar
dollyforme
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Posts: 662
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:00 am
Contact:

Re: My Little Lupe's 4th week photo show

Post by dollyforme »

I'm sure that we'll be seeing many more Lupe dolls in the future. The 60lbs is the deal maker for many would be doll buyers. I see many are just waiting for their Lupe to arrive or are saving up to buy one. I hope Abyss doesn't wear out their molds making all of them!

:mrgreen:
Bisexual Gals do it better!!!!!!!

User avatar
Fenrisulfr
Doll Elder
Doll Elder
Posts: 2574
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 4:25 pm
Location: Asgard
Contact:

Re: My Little Lupe's 4th week photo show

Post by Fenrisulfr »

If Agnetha was to get a silicone sister, your girl would tick the box, grrrrrrrrreat.
"I don't have dirty thoughts.............I have unapologetically normal thoughts which happen to be intensely erotic."

User avatar
narcissus
Former Member
Posts: 5353
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 12:00 am
Location: by myself but not alone

Re: My Little Lupe's 4th week photo show

Post by narcissus »

I like this comment that Big D. has with this photo :lol:, it's a play on the proletarians rally whine (see the Communist Manifesto for reference)

Image

Little Lupe: Viva la revolution! Sexy dolls unite. Demand better working conditions, more shinny thing to wear, the keys to the car....

Big D. Lups you can't even sit up on the bed by youself.


That's hilarious!

:haha4: :haha4: :haha4:

If Lups is looking for handouts, I'll give my hands out to her alright! :twisted:

User avatar
mexdl
Doll Mentor
Doll Mentor
Posts: 1524
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:40 pm
Location: near fantasy island
Contact:

Re: My Little Lupe's 4th week photo show

Post by mexdl »

8O :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

put a comunist hat with a star in the front and you have a super cute "guerrillera"

those lips are killing me!

lupe is H O T !!!!!!!!!!!!!

congratulations, great poses, great doll! :thumbs_up: :thumbs_up: :thumbs_up:

User avatar
JoyDivision
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 4:18 pm
Contact:

Re: My Little Lupe's 4th week photo show

Post by JoyDivision »

Gabrielle1 wrote:That Lupe is one FINE doll... wow.
Thanks Gabrielle1, I'll pass the message along to Little Lupe :)
Dollscrazy wrote:HOT BABY!!! :razz:
Thanks Dollscrazy, I gave her ass a kiss for you, it burnt my lips :haha4:
kharn wrote:Wow! what a little stunner, great photos :D
Kharn, thanks for your kind words :D
dollyforme wrote:I'm sure that we'll be seeing many more Lupe dolls in the future. The 60lbs is the deal maker for many would be doll buyers. I see many are just waiting for their Lupe to arrive or are saving up to buy one. I hope Abyss doesn't wear out their molds making all of them!

They'd be making a very good choice in getting a Lupe. I can't wait to see other new Lupe pictures :multi:
FENRISULFR wrote:If Agnetha was to get a silicone sister, your girl would tick the box, grrrrrrrrreat.
Go for it FENRISULFR! A sister for Agnetha would be great :grab:
narcissus wrote:I like this comment that Big D. has with this photo :lol:, it's a play on the proletarians rally whine (see the Communist Manifesto for reference)

Image

Little Lupe: Viva la revolution! Sexy dolls unite. Demand better working conditions, more shinny thing to wear, the keys to the car....

Big D. Lups you can't even sit up on the bed by youself.


That's hilarious!

:haha4: :haha4: :haha4:

If Lups is looking for handouts, I'll give my hands out to her alright! :twisted:
:mrgreen:
Yeah, and during this photo shot Jenny was in the background saying, Yeah, but who is John Gult?
Mexdollover wrote:8O :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

put a comunist hat with a star in the front and you have a super cute "guerrillera"

those lips are killing me!

lupe is H O T !!!!!!!!!!!!!

congratulations, great poses, great doll! :thumbs_up: :thumbs_up: :thumbs_up:
Mexdollover! Great to hear from you again. Haven't heard from you since before my Little Lupe got here. I just tapped her ass one time for you :D

Ok, now that I'm back, there will be an episode 10/6 of the Jenny & Little Lupe shop going up within the next hour. There will be about 20 pictures and they'll be a tread from the Abyss Readoll section of this site. And for those who are new to the show, you can catch past episodes at:

http://www.dollalbum.com/dollgallery/in ... ?cat=13541

User avatar
narcissus
Former Member
Posts: 5353
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 12:00 am
Location: by myself but not alone

Re: My Little Lupe's 4th week photo show

Post by narcissus »

JoyDivision wrote:
Yeah, and during this photo shot Jenny was in the background saying, Yeah, but who is John Galt?
:haha4: :haha4: :haha4:

Years ago I was pulled over for blowing a red light late at night and one of the two cop cars that surrounded my vehicle a cop from one of them asked "So, I have to ask, 'Who is John Galt?'" for he saw it on my car. :lol: Only person that ever asked me about him in all the years I had it on my car. :? As I was telling him who he is, the other officer was issuing me a fine and 4 points I think it was on my liscence.

Image

User avatar
JoyDivision
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 4:18 pm
Contact:

Re: My Little Lupe's 4th week photo show

Post by JoyDivision »

narcissus wrote:
JoyDivision wrote:
Yeah, and during this photo shot Jenny was in the background saying, Yeah, but who is John Galt?
:haha4: :haha4: :haha4:

Years ago I was pulled over for blowing a red light late at night and one of the two cop cars that surrounded my vehicle a cop from one of them asked "So, I have to ask, 'Who is John Galt?'" for he saw it on my car. :lol: Only person that ever asked me about him in all the years I had it on my car. :? As I was telling him who he is, the other officer was issuing me a fine and 4 points I think it was on my liscence.

Image
I put that in cause I had a feeling :D I'm at present going through the audio book of, you know what. Almost at the end, I'm at "the speech". She could have easily cut this to about 1/12 the size and called it....Let me think of a good title.....The Fountain Head.
Form following function. And I'd use as my model hum...someone like, ah...Frank Lloyd Wright. (Oh Frankie had a head, as big as a house, Hi-De-hi-ho) :haha4:

But seriously, what do you think of Ms. Rand being on SSI and Medicare at the time of her death. Did she give up the ghost and decide to become, a zero? And don't you think she may have taken the commies taking her families business away alittle too far. I'm all for the power of the individual, but not the uber being or an aristocracy.

P.S. Did you see the movie?

User avatar
narcissus
Former Member
Posts: 5353
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 12:00 am
Location: by myself but not alone

Re: My Little Lupe's 4th week photo show

Post by narcissus »

JoyDivision wrote: I put that in cause I had a feeling :D I'm at present going through the audio book of, you know what. Almost at the end, I'm at "the speech". She could have easily cut this to about 1/12 the size and called it....Let me think of a good title.....The Fountain Head.
:haha4:

I actually have her name tattooed on my hand, I have 'RAND' across the tops of my fingers, and 'ayn' in the middle of my knuckles, so when I make a fist it reads:

ayn
RAND

My other fist reads: "A is A" across it. 8)
JoyDivision wrote: But seriously, what do you think of Ms. Rand being on SSI and Medicare at the time of her death.
Yes, Objectivists wonder if it is moral to be on such programs, seeing how VERY opposed they are to the entire system that makes such programs possible. It basically goes like this man: I would go on it as a way of getting the money that was taken off of me by force, back. And still be oppsed to the system as a whole, and actively work towards making this whole country, not Go Galt! :wink: but rather, go laissez-faire capitalistic. Work towards the abolition of such programs based upon taxation. Now one is free to voluntarily contibute their money to such things, sure go ahead, but don't fucking include me in on it by force, you know? That's how it would work in LFC.
JoyDivision wrote:I'm all for the power of the individual, but not the uber being or an aristocracy.
I'm all about individualism and laissez-faire capitalism, myself.
JoyDivision wrote:P.S. Did you see the movie?
No, but I saw clips. There will be a Part 2, and probably a Part 3.
I had a thread going here about the movie, but it was locked :shakefist: , but you might like viewing it anyways sometime :) :
http://dollforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=34672

That said, let's be careful this thread doesn't get locked too! :o :lol:

User avatar
Bianca
Site Owners Group
Site Owners Group
Posts: 5934
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 12:00 am
Location: Midiman's House, NS CANADA
Contact:

Re: My Little Lupe's 4th week photo show

Post by Bianca »

She is a stunner. I gotta have me one. Should be an interesting combo side by side. A jessica drake and a Lupe :)
xxxooo Bianca
COVERDOLL
Galleries at ...
Coverdoll | Doll Forum

User avatar
JoyDivision
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 4:18 pm
Contact:

Re: My Little Lupe's 4th week photo show

Post by JoyDivision »

Sorry for coming late to the party on this one, knew this one and several others you wrote was going to take some time for me to respond to, so here goes.
narcissus wrote:

I actually have her name tattooed on my hand, I have 'RAND' across the tops of my fingers, and 'ayn' in the middle of my knuckles, so when I make a fist it reads:
ayn
RAND

My other fist reads: "A is A" across it. 8) :lol:
Don't you think this is a bit of an oxymoron, seeing how she seemed to be against the initiation of force (even though she thought it was right for European colonists to take land from the American Indian), and how the fist, weather used in a violent act or not, is the symbol of violence. It suggest that you get in line with her philosophy by will or by force.
narcissus wrote:
JoyDivision wrote: But seriously, what do you think of Ms. Rand being on SSI and Medicare at the time of her death.
Yes, Objectivists wonder if it is moral to be on such programs, seeing how VERY opposed they are to the entire system that makes such programs possible. It basically goes like this man: I would go on it as a way of getting the money that was taken off of me by force, back. And still be oppsed to the system as a whole, and actively work towards making this whole country, not Go Galt! :wink: but rather, go laissez-faire capitalistic. Work towards the abolition of such programs based upon taxation. Now one is free to voluntarily contibute their money to such things, sure go ahead, but don't fucking include me in on it by force, you know? That's how it would work in LFC.
Ok, I want to first make one thing clear, I like Ayn Rand Love this country. I think at one time it was the greatest country in the history of the world, though even during it's time of greatness it practiced institutionalized slavery and racism. One of the things that I think Ms. Rand failed to see that made this country great is it's system of checks and balances, and it's duel party system. The so called founding fathers of this country knew that any extremist philosophy or political practice would not work.

Having said this, I originally posed this question of Ms. Rand being on SSI to a person I work with how introduced me to her writings. He gave me almost exactly the same answer as you. My answer, Ayn Rand being the creator of the concept of objectivism should have been operating at the highest standard of it, and that this served to muddy the waters of her philosophy in practice.

As for laissez-faire capitalism, to me that's like saying there should be no rules of the road. That all capitalist are benign and to be totally trusted not to engage in activities that could and would hurt others. I just today saw a Frontline piece on present concerns about the use of nuclear power, where at one point they talked about a nuclear power company in Nebraska that the NRC wanted better safeguards against something happening here that happened in Japan. The company didn't want to willfully comply. So they were forced to by the government. The company complied, and some short time after compliance, Fort Hood Nebraska, where the plant is located, had one of the biggest floods in it's history and only the newly enacted safety measures kept that plant from becoming another Fukushima Daiichi nightmare. I am a capitalist, but like Warren Buffet, I don't believe in the extremes of laissez-faire.

Hey, but again, this is a doll site so before my Antonio Salieri chimes in or shoots me another PM, what about these great looking dolls :D . I will clear up this reference in another post of yours about some pictures I was politely asked to take down.

http://www.dollalbum.com/dollgallery/in ... ?cat=13541

User avatar
narcissus
Former Member
Posts: 5353
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 12:00 am
Location: by myself but not alone

Re: My Little Lupe's 4th week photo show

Post by narcissus »

JoyDivision wrote: Don't you think this is a bit of an oxymoron, seeing how she seemed to be against the initiation of force[...]and how the fist, weather used in a violent act or not, is the symbol of violence. It suggest that you get in line with her philosophy by will or by force.
Now this is an interesting way to look at it. I use logic and reason, instead of my fists, but will if I have to.
JoyDivision wrote: (even though she thought it was right for European colonists to take land from the American Indian)
Sure, she was very right. I have a quote that explains her position clearly:

This is from the book Ayn Rand Answers:
Now, I don't care to discuss the alleged complaints American Indians have against this country. I believe, with good reason, the most unsympathetic Hollywood portrayal of Indians and what they did to the white man. They had no right to a country merely because they were born here and then acted like savages. The white man did not conquer this country. And you're a racist if you object, because it means you believe that certain men are entitled to something because of their race. You believe that if someone is born in a magnificent country and doesn't know what to do with it, he still has a property right to it. He does not. Since the Indians did not have the concept of property or property rights--they didn't have a settled society, they had predominantly nomadic tribal "cultures"--they didn't have rights to the land, and there was no reason for anyone to grant them rights that they had not conceived of and were not using. It's wrong to attack a country that respects (or even tries to respect) individual rights. If you do, you're an aggressor and are morally wrong. But if a "country" does not protect rights--if a group of tribesmen are the slaves of their tribal chief--why should you respect the "rights" that they don't have or respect? The same is true for a dictatorship. The citizens in it have individual rights, but the country has no rights and so anyone has the right to invade it, because rights are not recognized in that country; and no individual or country can have its cake and eat it too--that is, you can't claim one should respect the "rights" of Indians, when they had no concept of rights and no respect for rights. But let's suppose they were all beautifully innocent savages--which they certainly were not. What were they fighting for, in opposing the white man on this continent? For their wish to continue a primitive existnece; for their "right" to keep part of the earth untouched--to keep everybody out so they could live like animals or cavemen. Any European who brought with him an element of civilization had the right to take over this continent, and it's great that some of them did. The racist Indians today--those who condemn America--do not respect individual rights.
JoyDivision wrote: One of the things that I think Ms. Rand failed to see that made this country great is it's system of checks and balances, and it's duel party system. The so called founding fathers of this country knew that any extremist philosophy or political practice would not work.
All I will say is that Atlas Shrugged is America's Second Declaration of Independence - Onkar Ghate think sthat it should be consdiered that in a lecture, and this is the summary of the lecture which I could link to if wanted:
In 1776 Thomas Jefferson announced to the world America’s plans for independence. For the first time in history, there was to be a nation and a government dedicated to the individual’s rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. But from inception, and from both within and without, the ideals of the new nation were under attack.

Without a full justification of an individual’s moral right to pursue his own life and happiness—not serve his neighbors, God or country—the nation was vulnerable, and its founding principles were slowly chipped away. In 1957 the missing justification came with the publication of Atlas Shrugged. On this, the book’s 50th anniversary, we will examine the moral revolution launched by Ayn Rand, without which the political revolution of the Founding Fathers had to remain incomplete. We will see what this moral revolution has meant for America so far, and what it promises for the future. We will see why Atlas Shrugged should be considered America’s second Declaration of Independence—a declaration not of political but of moral independence.
JoyDivision wrote: My answer, Ayn Rand being the creator of the concept of objectivism should have been operating at the highest standard of it, and that this served to muddy the waters of her philosophy in practice.
It doesn't muddy a thing, this is Objectivism in practice, Objectivism applied to the real world. You pay taxes on shit, you have your money taken off of you that you earned, you have sales taxes, etc. The point is, getting on such programs is NOT immoral, as it acts to get some or all your money back, many think it would be immoral if they got on such programs since they are against those types of entitlement programs to begin with. Now, trying to end/abolish those entitlement programs altogether is the key though, of course.
JoyDivision wrote:As for laissez-faire capitalism, to me that's like saying there should be no rules of the road.
Oh, but there are. There would be a government. To protect and uphold individual rights. Laws, courts, cops, national defense...
JoyDivision wrote:That all capitalist are benign and to be totally trusted not to engage in activities that could and would hurt others.
Anyone is free to be benign or malignant. The choice is theirs. But there are rules of the road that can be enforced, just like today. You'll have a mix of people doing bad things, and people not. Just like today. But probably less than today.
JoyDivision wrote:Hey, but again, this is a doll site so before my Antonio Salieri chimes in or shoots me another PM, what about these great looking dolls :D . I will clear up this reference in another post of yours about some pictures I was politely asked to take down.

http://www.dollalbum.com/dollgallery/in ... ?cat=13541
Yes, we better chill on this talk openly before anyone whines, or PM's are fired off at us both from staff here, or the staff comes with scissors to cut this part of the thread.

User avatar
JoyDivision
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 4:18 pm
Contact:

Re: My Little Lupe's 4th week photo show

Post by JoyDivision »

narcissus wrote:
JoyDivision wrote:Hey, but again, this is a doll site so before my Antonio Salieri chimes in or shoots me another PM, what about these great looking dolls :D . I will clear up this reference in another post of yours about some pictures I was politely asked to take down.
Yes, we better chill on this talk openly before anyone whines, or PM's are fired off at us both from staff here, or the staff comes with scissors to cut this part of the thread.
This is great stuff Narcissus, and I am willing to continue this in PM, but I have a few last things to say on the matter from this thread. This thread that I started, and as such feel that it is akin to my house or, private property to maintain.:D (yeah I know thought Nazi's or Antonio Salieri, it's an open forum), I'm not referring to you Narc, but getting back to you, if after I've addressed a few issues you
wish to continue this in open forum, I don't really care what the thought Nazi's would do to me on this site, I will get the last word on this open forum thread, unless you see me as savage and therefor not having the right to my say :D :glou: .
JoyDivision wrote:(even though she thought it was right for European colonists to take land from the American Indian)
narcissus wrote:Sure, she was very right. I have a quote that explains her position clearly:

This is from the book Ayn Rand Answers:
...(anyone else reading this can read the quote elsewhere in this thread.

Just because she says so doesn't automatically make it so :!: In this case, she's contradicting herself. In this quote you have of her she's saying Europeans had the right to initiate force, but in the speech from her book, Atlas Shredded, as utterly long winded as it is, John Galt says that no man has the right to initiate violence against another man, period. It was never stated that, unless they are, her word "savages". It was the Europeans that initiated violence with the Indians, and her attempt to try to flip the script of racism is called "blaming the victim". Who is she trying to fool, if this country was previously inhabited by a mixed race of "savages" she still would have thought the Europeans would have had the right to take it by force. Anything to jump start the launching of her beloved ideal, America. "I don't care to discuss the alleged complaints American Indians have against this country". Discussions lead to the exchange of ideas and information that can go to clarify ones position through the exposure of information previously unknown. She acts as if she's fully armed with all the information necessary to make an informed decision without even hearing the other sides position, from themselves. The chief failing of this kind of arrogance is that it creates a blind side that makes her easy to attack. So Like Rush Limbaugh, we won't confront the enemy we'll just talk about them as if we know them. The cowards way out.

A is ? Blank out..."I believe, with good reason, the most unsympathetic Hollywood portrayal of Indians and what they did to the white man." With good reason she says, A is...What's the good reason? She never states the other, A. Oh, I know. Because she wrote for Hollywood for a short time, probably some of these most unsympathetic scenes she talking about, because she wrote it, it must be true....Give me the reasons or this is just...Blank out.

"They had no right to a country merely because they were born here and then acted like savages". Look why didn't she just drop the middle part of this and say savages have no rights. Europeans were great at invading lands, then erecting laws to make themselves seem to be in the right. A baby has less since than a so called savage, does that mean if anyone wanted to do what ever they wanted to babies, because their not developed to a certain stage, that it's ok, smack the baby, kick the baby, kill the baby, that's ok? See, I can make the same kind of dumb remarks using the exact kind of line of "reasoning" she does.

"The white man did not conquer this country, and your a racist if you object" If they didn't conquer it, which is absurd in and of it self, then why would anyone be a racist if they object. Object to what, she says that the white man didn't conquer this country. Property rights don't exist until you invade/conquer a land, in this case by the initiation of force by the Europeans, then they claim as property what they've taken by force and make laws with prejudice to yourselves, and call it moral.

But how about those dolls :D . I've got a few more pictures of my Little Lupe that I just posted, here's a sample.

Image

Now where was I...Oh yeah, "It's wrong to attack a country that respects (or even tries to respect) individual rights". The implication is that the American Indian was not respecting individual rights. Before Europeans landed here American Indians were not disrespecting anyones rights anymore than Europeans were disrespecting each other rights. They were practicing their own system of mutual respect of their people. If they weren't practicing a form of respect for each others rights Indians would have been killing off Indians not just from other tribes but from their own. Indians within a tribe would have been laying claim to anything and everything of his neighbor, without any laws to protect them. This is not the case, Indians had Indian laws to deal with those who disrespected individuals rights.

Slaves of their chiefs? Never, ever heard that one before. Whites calling Indians racist? Again it's called "Blaming the victim" The American Indian was feed lie after lie until they were driven clear across the country, why? So the Europeans could not just have some of the country but ALL of the country. In the movie, The Matrix, the head agent referred to another organism that operates like this on this planet. A virus, attempting to consume not just some, not just most, but ALL, and in doing so is still not satisfied.

The main problem I have with Ayn Rand is that she tries to justify a reason for the right for the non existence of those who do not think in the exact same ridged way that she does, mankind has been here before. Her's is a cast system, an illegal pyramid where only the ones at the top deserve to even live. No one is harming industrialist in this country, their doing just fine, that's why you've never seen them go on strike. In Atlas Shredded she creates this ultra leftest society that this country has never even come close to becoming, not even in the 60's. That was the Soviet Union and this is not, never has been, never will be.

At the end of the movie "Atlas Shredded", which I bought. In the extras section of the DVD there are everyday people saying one after the other, like robots, I am John Galt. I doubt that any of them have invented and brought to market a damn thing. Their not the producers of the world, the engines of it, they are Rand's fodder. Where are the voices of the great industrialist, or in todays lingo, information age producers, out on their yachts I suppose (nothing wrong with that).
JoyDivision wrote: One of the things that I think Ms. Rand failed to see that made this country great is it's system of checks and balances, and it's duel party system. The so called founding fathers of this country knew that any extremist philosophy or political practice would not work.
narcissus wrote:All I will say is that Atlas Shrugged is America's Second Declaration of Independence - Onkar Ghate think sthat it should be consdiered that in a lecture, and this is the summary of the lecture which I could link to if wanted:
In 1776 Thomas Jefferson announced to the world America’s plans for independence. For the first time in history, there was to be a nation and a government dedicated to the individual’s rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. But from inception, and from both within and without, the ideals of the new nation were under attack.
Jefferson and Rand have one thing in common, they were both hypocrites. Jefferson for postulating the notion that for the first time in history there was a nation dedicated to the individual rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, while all the while owning slaves. The ones who's muddied hands and broken backs really went to building this nation as much as any others. And Ayn Rand, "A is A". Rational thought is supreme. She's right about that, so why would such a rational person, who knew the heath risk of smoking, be such an avid and flamboyantly heavy smoker? How could she rationalize her habit? A is....blank out. She died from her....blank out. There are other example I could list but i've taken up way too much time on this.

Hopefully last words on the subject in this open forum. Don't be so far up her ass that you can't see the light of day anymore.

If you want, we can continue this in PM :D

Now here's another picture of my little whore Lupe :D

Image

http://www.dollalbum.com/dollgallery/in ... ?cat=13541

User avatar
narcissus
Former Member
Posts: 5353
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 12:00 am
Location: by myself but not alone

Re: My Little Lupe's 4th week photo show

Post by narcissus »

JoyDivision wrote: Just because she says so doesn't automatically make it so :!:
I know that.
JoyDivision wrote: In this case, she's contradicting herself. In this quote you have of her she's saying Europeans had the right to initiate force, but in the speech from her book, Atlas Shredded, as utterly long winded as it is, John Galt says that no man has the right to initiate violence against another man, period.
Right, but the use of retaliatory force, in defense, is perfectly fine. This is not that libertarian crapola, we can go after rogue governments elsewhere in the world if we really wanted to, because humans are humans whereever they are, and have rights. Oh and you are misspelling the books title purposely like that, which I don't find amusing.
JoyDivision wrote: A baby has less since than a so called savage, does that mean if anyone wanted to do what ever they wanted to babies, because their not developed to a certain stage, that it's ok, smack the baby, kick the baby, kill the baby, that's ok? See, I can make the same kind of dumb remarks using the exact kind of line of "reasoning" she does.
A baby is born into a country that is already ruled by objective law, which states that when they are born, they have certain rights that must be respected.
JoyDivision wrote: Jefferson and Rand have one thing in common, they were both hypocrites. Jefferson for postulating the notion that for the first time in history there was a nation dedicated to the individual rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, while all the while owning slaves.
But at the time, it was different then. You are acting like they know what we know of today about different races being the same, since we are all humans, we should all have the same rights. Not all thought of them like that then, obviously. Rand's writing on racism is the best that I have ever read on the subject, it's in her The Virtue of Selfishness.
JoyDivision wrote: The ones who's muddied hands and broken backs really went to building this nation as much as any others. And Ayn Rand, "A is A". Rational thought is supreme. She's right about that, so why would such a rational person, who knew the heath risk of smoking, be such an avid and flamboyantly heavy smoker? How could she rationalize her habit?
Once she found out the health issues with smoking, she quit.
JoyDivision wrote:Don't be so far up her ass that you can't see the light of day anymore.
Don't worry, I don't like assholes at all. I stay away from them.

Post Reply

INFORMATIONS