How much better can it get than this?

Boobman · Post by **Boobman** » Sat Oct 13, 2018 10:52 pm

How much better can it get than this? For one if she delivered herself to me, got herself ready, then banged my brains out, with her doing all the work! Nice sculpt

SGTJDUSAR · Post by **SGTJDUSAR** » Sat Oct 13, 2018 11:03 pm

Looks good. Hoping that whoever makes these Dolls can make the Legs look better. For us Legs freaks Legs are a big selling point. Too many Dolls have such skinny legs that they often look like Tooth Picks. A good market is to pay attention to the Legs Freaks who notice the legs first. Do not make them skinny, and not too fat.

Dollsampler · Post by **Dollsampler** » Sun Oct 14, 2018 4:24 pm

Booty Call Dolls wrote:Doll Sampler,
Let me see what I can find out.
The past tells us this is their old 169 with proper placement attempted and the SAME THING happened that did with the 168.
This doll looks FAR THICKER to me than their old 169.
I will email them
Best,
Jeff

Hi Jeff,
Yes it looks to me that the doll is thicker at the shoulders and at the hips and she looks consequently more mature than before. That could please some members.Also the genitals looks now anatomically corrects.The breasts are more mature also (looking fattier) I like especially the nipples new shape which is very erotic.
The Sangmei-DH168 170-IRT169 original model I have here looks Indeed quite thiner and represent a slender thin far Younger woman body.

The weight should be more than 40kgs as the original model weighted 38kgs except if some weight reduction devices are used in the skeleton.

However as SGTJDUSAR pointed it out they apparently didnt increase the calves diameter together with the thigh diameter which give a slight unbalance to the legs sculpt. It could be also that they increased the legs lenght to reach the height of 152cm for the body without head (previously 148cm which matched a 165cm tall doll) If that is the case (IRT should correct me if that is wrong) she will obviously be long legged as the original model (165cm) is already long legged (compared to AYUMI the original 172cm one) but not with excess.

Alottahope · Post by **Alottahope** » Sun Oct 14, 2018 6:06 pm

From the front, her snatch looks fabulous! From behind... not so good. It seems the moment you bend her over, her holes are way wrong.
Maybe some of these TPE companies can take lessons from RealDoll on proper snatch location!
Here are some photos for them to looks at.

Dollsampler · Post by **Dollsampler** » Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:42 am

Alottahope wrote:From the front, her snatch looks fabulous! From behind... not so good. It seems the moment you bend her over, her holes are way wrong.
Maybe some of these TPE companies can take lessons from RealDoll on proper snatch location!
Here are some photos for them to looks at.

Indeed RealDoll (a US pioneer company) is the ROLLSROYCE brand of the Silicone sexdolls producers and amongst others their genitals are very realistic and customizable.
Unfortunately for the price of one of their dolls exclusively made in Silicone (7000 USD up) I can get up to 4 well made realistic TPE lovedolls.Silicone has some advantages to TPE but a backdraw together with its cost is hardness which impose the use of fragile gel implants in the buttocks for example.

Chinese TPE dolls makers are Learning fast and looking at 6YE amor genitals for example let's hope that within a year or so we will find erotically similar "snatch" shape and positionning than RealDoll has. It suffice to copy (by moulding ) and reproduce in TPE the best erotical genitals nature produce for years long isn't.

Dollsampler · Post by **Dollsampler** » Tue Oct 16, 2018 4:46 am

Hi allotofhope,

Thank you for these very good pictures of what nature is offering to us. Of course in nature also there are a lot of different snatch aspects.
What is very important to note is the way the entries are positioned very high when a woman is in doggy style. Dolls makers should respect the very important detail of the real long lenght (Always shortened in dolls) of the female "slot" as it is one of the basis of erotism.

siliconelover · Post by **siliconelover** » Tue Oct 16, 2018 4:59 am

Alottahope wrote: Perhaps a photo of a real girl can help too.

Nice photos but they are Not Permitted here. Real boobs are okay but not vaginas. There are specific legal certificates that have to be obtained for that type of content which we do not have. This is a Doll Community not a porn site.

Not knocking you Alotta, just don't want to see TDF get in trouble.

Anatomic correctness does not necessarily equate to usability. There are other factors at work with a doll that do not conform to a real woman.

Dollsampler · Post by **Dollsampler** » Tue Oct 16, 2018 5:14 am

Here you have a picture of the genitals of the new mould 168IRT. That is one of the best also in that respect.With legs not taken apart, her private parts looks quite similar to the real thing (except that both holes could still move a little higher)!Believe me this turn her incredibly sexy in doggy position.

: P1020345.JPG (4.71 MiB) Viewed 679 times

Alottahope · Post by **Alottahope** » Tue Oct 16, 2018 6:13 am

siliconelover wrote:
Alottahope wrote: Perhaps a photo of a real girl can help too.
Nice photos but they are Not Permitted here. Real boobs are okay but not vaginas. There are specific legal certificates that have to be obtained for that type of content which we do not have. This is a Doll Community not a porn site.

Anatomic correctness does not necessarily equate to usability. There are other factors at work with a doll that do not conform to a real woman.

Oops! Sorry bout that SW. I can't remove them. It's been more than 24 hrs

Post by **Booty Call Dolls** » Wed Oct 24, 2018 7:41 pm

Dollsampler,
I agree a little higher for sure.
Jeff

Nord · Post by **Nord** » Wed Oct 24, 2018 8:18 pm

Not my usual cup of tea, but I must say that they did great work on the anatomy overall. Probably the most realistic TPE-doll I've seen! It is certainly on the heavy side by todays standards, but on the other hand it's 169cm tall with fairly big tits and realistic shapes, so I'd say it's understandable in this case. People looking for light dolls shouldn't even look in the 160+ category to begin with.

As usual not a fan of placement of orifices though, or specifically how they appear from behind and when bending over.