Questions regarding the 165F
Questions regarding the 165F
A have a couple of question regarding the 165F:
Is the 2019 model an updated version (mold, skeleton)?
Are the measurements accurate? Is she 165cm tall (with head)?
Does the knee lock so you don't get that awkward bent forward look?
I will appreciate if any current owner or vendor can answer these questions.
Thank you!
-
- Apprentice
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2019 2:24 pm
- Contact:
Re: Questions regarding the 165F
Newer version is a bit thicker, especially her lower parts
But that does not mean that she looks worse. The proportions of body shape are almost perfect.
I can confirm her height(165cm) and size of the bust(87cm), i did not measure anything more.
When it comes to weight...she is heavy, about 40kg.
The problem with standing has been solved, the knee lock.
There are a few things you should know about this doll.
Ball-joint skeleton and head connector are superior to conevntional one.
However, her lower back can not be bent backwards nor forwards, only twist side to side.
They also use new tpe formula. Soft and very pleasant to the touch, but also more susceptible to abrasion.
Vendor told me that i don't need to oil this doll. I do not know if it's true, I'm still doing the "oil procedure" but much less often than with other dolls.
- Booty Call Dolls
- VENDOR
- Posts: 23670
- Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 3:49 pm
- Contact:
Re: Questions regarding the 165F
Some people might like her figure more.
V/r
Jeff
-princeoverit. One vendor name kept coming up as being great at helping customers walk through the process, Booty Call Dolls. So I decided I would work with them on this first purchase, and did.
-Just in timeYou could not of found a better person to help you with your first doll. Jeff /Booty call dolls, knows his stuff... One of the few members that is a vendor and a real lover of dolls. He owns quite a few dolls, and really understands the love we all share.
- Dollarhyde
- Doll Oracle
- Posts: 8433
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 9:22 pm
- Location: The Tardis Somewhere In the Timey Wimey
- Contact:
Re: Questions regarding the 165F
Hello Herald of corruption and welcome to the forum... thanks for sharing...Herald of corruption wrote:I got this doll in January 2019. She has a new mold.
Newer version is a bit thicker, especially her lower parts
But that does not mean that she looks worse. The proportions of body shape are almost perfect.
I can confirm her height(165cm) and size of the bust(87cm), i did not measure anything more.
When it comes to weight...she is heavy, about 40kg.
The problem with standing has been solved, the knee lock.
There are a few things you should know about this doll.
Ball-joint skeleton and head connector are superior to conevntional one.
However, her lower back can not be bent backwards nor forwards, only twist side to side.
They also use new tpe formula. Soft and very pleasant to the touch, but also more susceptible to abrasion.
Vendor told me that i don't need to oil this doll. I do not know if it's true, I'm still doing the "oil procedure" but much less often than with other dolls.
http://www.dollalbum.com/dollgallery/in ... ?cat=13267
"Dammit Jim I'm a doctor, not a doll maker!"
Re: Questions regarding the 165F
The back does not bend at all? And your saying the measurements are not as stated on the website. If you have time and a clothing tape, further measurements could be useful.Herald of corruption wrote:I got this doll in January 2019. She has a new mold.
I can confirm her height(165cm) and size of the bust(87cm), i did not measure anything more.
When it comes to weight...she is heavy, about 40kg.
The problem with standing has been solved, the knee lock.
There are a few things you should know about this doll.
Ball-joint skeleton and head connector are superior to conevntional one.
However, her lower back can not be bent backwards nor forwards, only twist side to side.
Thanks
Re: Questions regarding the 165F
Why that just begs the request: can we have a side by side comparison of the 1st version and the current version? I’m sure we’ve probably been shown both on several occasions, but nothing beats a comparison next to each other. Just sayinBooty Call Dolls wrote:And supposedly, you can also get the 1st version.
Some people might like her figure more.
V/r
Jeff
- Booty Call Dolls
- VENDOR
- Posts: 23670
- Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 3:49 pm
- Contact:
Re: Questions regarding the 165F
I agree, but that would mean having both in stock at the same time
Merida,
I will be stunned if the dolls can not bend at all front and back.
I just started a thread showing this
Best,
Jeff
-princeoverit. One vendor name kept coming up as being great at helping customers walk through the process, Booty Call Dolls. So I decided I would work with them on this first purchase, and did.
-Just in timeYou could not of found a better person to help you with your first doll. Jeff /Booty call dolls, knows his stuff... One of the few members that is a vendor and a real lover of dolls. He owns quite a few dolls, and really understands the love we all share.
-
- Apprentice
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2019 2:24 pm
- Contact:
Re: Questions regarding the 165F
My 165F measurements:
bust:87,
under bust:68
waist:58
hips:91-93( im not sure, but strings 91-94 fit perfectly)
thigh:52
calf:34
And I totally agree, they should make a new glamour gallery for this doll.
Re: Questions regarding the 165F
Thanks.Herald of corruption wrote:Merida
My 165F measurements:
bust:87,
under bust:68
waist:58
hips:91-93( im not sure, but strings 91-94 fit perfectly)
thigh:52
calf:34
And I totally agree, they should make a new glamour gallery for this doll.
- Panther68
- Doll Guru
- Posts: 5016
- Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2017 12:19 am
- Location: Peoples Republic of Kalifornia
- Contact:
Re: Questions regarding the 165F
Hey Merida, I have two of the older version of the 165F. They can bend forward and arch back, just not as much as some other dolls.Merida wrote:Thanks.Herald of corruption wrote:Merida
My 165F measurements:
bust:87,
under bust:68
waist:58
hips:91-93( im not sure, but strings 91-94 fit perfectly)
thigh:52
calf:34
And I totally agree, they should make a new glamour gallery for this doll.
Re: Questions regarding the 165F
I never knew you had two of those. Interesting... What sort of difference would there be in measurements compared the new one as stated above?Panther68 wrote:Hey Merida, I have two of the older version of the 165F. They can bend forward and arch back, just not as much as some other dolls.
-
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 725
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 4:27 pm
- Contact:
Re: Questions regarding the 165F
I have one also bought last year. As far as I can see they Added thicknesses on the thighs and calves so the doll is at least 2 kgs heavier (40 instead of 38) They did that in order to improve the positionning of her holes and correct the tearing off defect at the place where the buttocks link to the thighs.So now the buttock ending into the thigh has a more progressive shape (on the old model it is almost perpendicular)
I just received my 166a and can confirm that the TPE has been modified altough very soft still. I am glad to confirm also they improved the locking of the legs in standing conditions.Further more that skinny doll is anatomically corrrect.As a default, there is the fact noted by many buyers that the vaginal labias are not symetrical (one side is shortened) but I can live with that.
Basicaly I still prefer the 165F older model because the lower body was more in line with the upper one.Amongst my 30 dolls (one more will arrive soon) that is one of those (altough her breasts are a little big at my taste) who give me pleasure the most because this 6YE model looks so real ! The old model was well balanced and sculpted on the basis of an European norm 36 (The new model has the N 38 legs measurements but still with the 36 upper body). The 6YE heads also are more alive than many other brand's heads.
-
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 725
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 4:27 pm
- Contact:
Re: Questions regarding the 165F
Hi herald of corruption,Herald of corruption wrote:Merida
My 165F measurements:
bust:87,
under bust:68
waist:58
hips:91-93( im not sure, but strings 91-94 fit perfectly)
thigh:52
calf:34
And I totally agree, they should make a new glamour gallery for this doll.
If your bust and underbust measurements are correct the breast size is an European D cup.The old model is pointing to a large D cup or a small E cup but not a F cup.
Re: Questions regarding the 165F
Yes we have upgraded the skeleton, especially the knee that the motion angle is limited so that it won’t stand in awkward bent look. Yes she is 165cm tall with head included.
Looks like the scale is tipping on 6YE's side.
-
- Apprentice
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2019 2:24 pm
- Contact:
Re: Questions regarding the 165F
I am a fan of busty dolls (and womens),and I like her breasts, which are a bit strange:Dollsampler wrote:Hi herald of corruption,Herald of corruption wrote:Merida
My 165F measurements:
bust:87,
under bust:68
waist:58
hips:91-93( im not sure, but strings 91-94 fit perfectly)
thigh:52
calf:34
And I totally agree, they should make a new glamour gallery for this doll.
If your bust and underbust measurements are correct the breast size is an European D cup.The old model is pointing to a large D cup or a small E cup but not a F cup.
From side looks like D cup or small E like you wrote, from front like F or even G cup.
To check what bra she needs, I put on her 65H(EU size) and 70E bras, which I bought for my other dolls.
65H cups fit well, but the bra's circuit is too short and 70E cups are to small.
So I ordered some new bras and clothes for her, tomorrow I'll see if they fit.