sanhuiofficial.com

88 vs 92 vs 102 vs 117 vs 120 vs 125

Established since 2002, Sanhui Model Making Co.,Ltd has been endeavoring in the creation and the making of life-like female dolls in various sizes and materials. Our products range from anime models to life-sized and altered-proportion platinum silicone love dolls. The dolls are anatomically correct with fully functional orifices to the intimate touch and feel of a real lady with curvy figure from Yoga coaching.
Website: sanhuiofficial.com
jwhf
Doll Advisor
Doll Advisor
Posts: 862
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2018 11:11 pm
Contact:

Re: 88 vs 92 vs 102 vs 117 vs 120 vs 125

Post by jwhf »

agreed

ChallengerRT
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 210
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2017 3:31 pm
Contact:

Re: 88 vs 92 vs 102 vs 117 vs 120 vs 125

Post by ChallengerRT »

boinky wrote:After long (LONG!) consideration I have narrowed my search to a choice between a Sanhui and a JM doll. Before making the final choice I would love some advice from those more experienced among us if you're willing.
I am looking for a small doll with stiff joints, ideally in the 110 - 125 cm range, that doesn't look like a child, but also does not have ridiculously over-sized breasts. A doll that looks like a proportionate young woman, but is easy to store and handle.
In the past I've had:
* 65 and 75 cm:
The attachment 65-75cm.jpg is no longer available
Both were too small
* MLD (too hard and lacking detail, and a crap skeleton)
* 100 WM - body proportioned wrong - too thick for height, not really like an adult:
The attachment 100cmWM.jpg is no longer available
* Virgin Rode Doll - That was a great doll, but still too small/short and lose joints:
The attachment VRD.jpg is no longer available
I have also had the 156D and 140D from WM. Loved them both, but I can't afford the storage space and the tax on my back when moving and washing and so on.

I find Reiko (120cm):
The attachment Reiko.jpg is no longer available
most attractive and best fit for me, but I can't find it on the Sanhui website, so I assume it is out of production.
Price is a consideration too, but not the ultimate factor. And there are so many choices!
So the 88:
The attachment Sanhui_88_Nancy.jpg is no longer available
vs 92:
The attachment Sanhui_92_Miki.jpg is no longer available
cm are VERY close in size, but $200 apart. Why?
The 92 vs 102:
The attachment Sanhui_102_Lisa.jpg is no longer available
are almost the same price, yet 4 inches in size difference. Again, why?
Between 102 and 118:
The attachment Sanhui_118_Elfie.jpg is no longer available
(a little over 6 inches) there is a $600+ difference, so there must be some other considerations besides height that come into play.
Is there still a safe vendor that anyone knows of that still sells the 120 Reiko?:
The attachment Reiko.jpg is no longer available
How does Reiko compare to the newer 125cm Sarah?:
The attachment Sanhui_125_Sarah.jpg is no longer available
Pricewise Sarah, Reiko and Elfie seem to be in the same ballpark ($1500-1600). Are there significant differences in skeleton construction or material used?

Does anyone have any experience how any of these (over 100cm) Sanhui little ladies compare to JM Dolls' 110cm Lucy or Joey:
The attachment JMDolls_110_Joey.jpg is no longer available
Are there any other 110-125cm models with stiff joints and relatively normal size boobs (ideally scaled b or c cup) worth considering?

I know these are a lot of questions, but I also know there are many very knowledgeable elders on this forum who love to share their expertise, and it is greatly appreciated.
For those reviewing this old post, they may want to take a look at the JM 105cm if they haven't seen her already...

JM killed it with this one.

Take a good look at this pic and you'll get it.
Attachments
20190204_152427.jpg
20190204_152427.jpg (91.11 KiB) Viewed 1352 times

User avatar
Maddmatts
Active Poster
Active Poster
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun May 06, 2018 7:26 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: 88 vs 92 vs 102 vs 117 vs 120 vs 125

Post by Maddmatts »

They didn't know about it because it didn't exist a year ago. This is an old thread.

ChallengerRT
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 210
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2017 3:31 pm
Contact:

Re: 88 vs 92 vs 102 vs 117 vs 120 vs 125

Post by ChallengerRT »

Maddmatts wrote:They didn't know about it because it didn't exist a year ago. This is an old thread.
LOL! You're right! Didn't see it was posted Feb 2018!! (wish TDF would give more time to delete posts!)

lobsterpizza
Active Poster
Active Poster
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 1:36 am

Re: 88 vs 92 vs 102 vs 117 vs 120 vs 125

Post by lobsterpizza »

I've owned both the Sanhui 92cm and 120cm. They're VERY small, so I wouldn't recommend them unless the weight issue is a priority.

BluWatrViking01
Contributing Poster
Contributing Poster
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2021 10:24 am
Contact:

Re: 88 vs 92 vs 102 vs 117 vs 120 vs 125

Post by BluWatrViking01 »

Greetings boinky and contributors of this thread, I've been considering the purchase of a JM 65cm- 75cm doll and/or a Sanhui 92cm doll. I've been bouncing around TDF searching for some comparison photos of these exact dolls and happened across this thread. Seeing the dolls side by side and having other forum member's insights has helped narrow my selection. Just wanted to express my appreciation. Cheers!

Post Reply

INFORMATIONS