The neglected WM 172cm G-cup?
The neglected WM 172cm G-cup?
Re: The neglected WM 172cm G-cup?
viewtopic.php?f=215&t=88602
viewtopic.php?f=379&t=88521
These are the only 2 "major" threads I've seen cover this body. Is anybody interested in buying this doll?
- Arthur1960
- Doll Visionary
- Posts: 13956
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 1:44 pm
- Location: Suffolk, UK
- Contact:
Re: The neglected WM 172cm G-cup?
viewtopic.php?f=215&t=90044
Sarah
viewtopic.php?f=215&t=106417
Sophia:
viewtopic.php?f=224&t=89060
Athena:
viewtopic.php?f=215&t=93767
Monique
viewtopic.php?f=212&t=87519
Keiko
viewtopic.php?f=215&t=89419
Shuri
viewtopic.php?f=215&t=98819
Re: The neglected WM 172cm G-cup?
- Dolllove1991
- Doll Elder
- Posts: 2226
- Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2017 4:55 am
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: The neglected WM 172cm G-cup?
Re: The neglected WM 172cm G-cup?
I think she got derailed by this photo set. I remember seeing a lot of people complain that her limbs were oddly proportioned.
Re: The neglected WM 172cm G-cup?
She looks fine to me, but I may be mistaken. I feel like buying her just so people can know about her. Even its to say "Oh wow she looks pretty, but I cant get her up the stairs, time to sell her ". This is the only solution I see to fix the "Neglect" mentioned in the title, someone has to buy the doll and prove if she's good or not.Billiam wrote:... I think she got derailed by this photo set. I remember seeing a lot of people complain that her limbs were oddly proportioned.
Someone has to have bought her, statistically. If literally, no one bought her I would think WM would say something, asking why people wouldn't buy her. It cost a lot of money (I would think) to come up with a body, so they would be doing something like lowering the price to entice buyers.
It's so weird that this doll showed up and disappeared so quickly...
- PaulDenton2001
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 866
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:24 am
- Contact:
Re: The neglected WM 172cm G-cup?
170H has got more of a porn star body. That's probably why.Dolllove1991 wrote:I was going to buy this doll but its so close to the 170 H cup that It felt like they were to simiular. I do wonder why they want crazy advertising the 170H cup but not this doll there are almost no photos.
Re: The neglected WM 172cm G-cup?
-
- Contributing Poster
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2017 9:53 am
- Location: Sol Cal
- Contact:
Re: The neglected WM 172cm G-cup?
pup001 wrote:I've seen this doll, the WM 172cm G-cup on vendor sites. She looks like a great doll, but there is only one official set of photos of her. I only seen a few mentions of her here on the forum. I haven't seen any user photos. It seems like a shame that this doll has been neglected!
Re: The neglected WM 172cm G-cup?
GIRLFRIEND MATERIAL
*) the poster's use of feminine pronouns to refer to a female-looking doll in no way implies that the poster sees women as objects, or objects as women.
IANADO (I Am Not A Doll Owner) / picture is of a Zerg Lurker (because I don't post often)