What's June 2014 got to do with anything? That's a year ago mate - people want to see what's happening now.Lightning wrote:I posted 2 pictures (just a few posts ago) from a recent (june 2014) WM doll 158cm (source : a WMdolls topic and their website). You'll be the judge.Jimjam wrote:If WM has made improvements, can we see some pictures please? If not, OR will get my money.
Jimjam
Orifice placement
-
Jimjam
- Senior Member
- Posts: 442
- Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 1:23 pm
- Location: South East England, UK
- Contact:
Re: Orifice placement
Re: Orifice placement
Sorry ! I Meant June 2015 !!
http://dollforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=215&t=62574
http://dollforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=215&t=62574
-
Jimjam
- Senior Member
- Posts: 442
- Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 1:23 pm
- Location: South East England, UK
- Contact:
Re: Orifice placement
Lightning wrote:Sorry ! I Meant June 2015 !!
http://dollforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=215&t=62574
Well if that's the latest model, i'm still not happy. Why the raised rim around the anus? If anything it should be dished inwards, concave like. GAH! It still looks wrong, a bit vague and not very well detailed. OR Doll win hands down.
Jimjam
-
Jimjam
- Senior Member
- Posts: 442
- Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 1:23 pm
- Location: South East England, UK
- Contact:
Re: Orifice placement
Just as a side note, this is the new JM 110cm and IMO this is exactly what doll genitals should look like. I can't fault anything here, it just looks right. Why the TPE manufacturers can't follow JM's example i'll never know. Maybe their sculptors are celibate and have never seen real genitals before.
Jimjam
- HTB1wLrFHVXXXXbiXXXXq6xXFXXXR.jpg (38.83 KiB) Viewed 1054 times
Jimjam
Re: Orifice placement
I totally agree
Re: Orifice placement
Any updates to this? I concur with everyone that I would prefer anatomical correctness (or at least to have the option). To me, Sex From Behind > Missionary every day of the week.
