Orifice placement

Tybalt · Post by **Tybalt** » Thu Mar 12, 2015 9:37 pm

some one once asked, "why can't they put the mold line above the pussy instead of between the anal and vagina."

Lightning · Post by **Lightning** » Fri Mar 13, 2015 7:12 am

Seattle Slew wrote: Anyhow, I hope WM can demonstrate the updated versions of their beautiful dolls' bodies, in a similar fashion to the photo above. As long as we keep stating our observations in a diplomatic manner, the companies will make the proper adjustments, though it can take time, and there's bound to be confusion along the way.

+1

thelionking · Post by **thelionking** » Tue Mar 17, 2015 5:49 am

I can testify that my 125cm, bought in Oct 2014, though she feels real nice, her orifices are not correctly placed.

Slowstoxx · Post by **Slowstoxx** » Wed Mar 25, 2015 5:34 am

WM Dolls Affiliate wrote:Our dolls have vagina in right place now. This was changed on all TPE dolls from WM some time ago.

Really? Then why aren't there any new pictures? I really would like to buy a 125cm with the correct placement.

Reeds22 · Post by **Reeds22** » Thu Mar 26, 2015 11:10 am

WM Dolls Affiliate wrote:Our dolls have vagina in right place now. This was changed on all TPE dolls from WM some time ago.
Also, we do not have different type of skeletons, only one. I don't know why this matrix has listed two different ones, it is not correct. Maybe the Matrix moderator could fix this?

Is both the vaginal and the anal holes in the correct position now? Does that apply to the 163cm doll?

thelionking · Post by **thelionking** » Thu Mar 26, 2015 9:49 pm

nofingers4u wrote:
WM Dolls Affiliate wrote:Our dolls have vagina in right place now. This was changed on all TPE dolls from WM some time ago.
Also, we do not have different type of skeletons, only one. I don't know why this matrix has listed two different ones, it is not correct. Maybe the Matrix moderator could fix this?
Is both the vaginal and the anal holes in the correct position now? Does that apply to the 163cm doll?

This is the same question we are all wanting to know. Since we have not heard back from WM, I'm going with "no."

Lightning · Post by **Lightning** » Fri Jun 26, 2015 6:58 pm

At last an answer

I found a recent gallery from WMdolls for a 158cm body :

: WMdolls - Orifice Placement 158cm.jpg (113.96 KiB) Viewed 1961 times

I think the asshole shouldn't do a bump like this but I don't think it's a placement problem !
For the V the hole should be more South I think !

PlasticArtist · Post by **PlasticArtist** » Sun Jun 28, 2015 9:50 am

http://dollforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=223&t=62061
Here is a thread featuring an updated WM145
The holes are still not correct.
OR Doll is fixing the hole placement, YL Doll is fixing hole placment.
WM I really like your 145, please fix the hole placement. This is a sex doll, the sex holes need to be correct!

kookaburra · Post by **kookaburra** » Sun Jun 28, 2015 8:44 pm

You guys, it's pretty damn close at this point. You all are acting like these guys are out to get you.

I owned a doll with what looked like the right positions, but maybe because of the limited skeleton movement range, or the fact that she can't adjust herself for you, but some normal positions were very difficult to get into. We had a manufacturer that is now out of business that posted here, his dolls had the vagina much higher up than a real woman, and it was to make sex with an inanimate object more accessible. So the real issue with genital placement here is, is it comfortable to fuck in these positions?

Because it might be a little off, but it looks good. And if it fucks good, what is the problem? Is Judge Wapner on guys?

Obin · Post by **Obin** » Sun Jun 28, 2015 8:49 pm

majorperv wrote:You guys, it's pretty damn close at this point. You all are acting like these guys are out to get you.

I owned a doll with what looked like the right positions, but maybe because of the limited skeleton movement range, or the fact that she can't adjust herself for you, but some normal positions were very difficult to get into. We had a manufacturer that is now out of business that posted here, his dolls had the vagina much higher up than a real woman, and it was to make sex with an inanimate object more accessible. So the real issue with genital placement here is, is it comfortable to fuck in these positions?

Because it might be a little off, but it looks good. And if it fucks good, what is the problem? Is Judge Wapner on guys?

Superbabes is gone, so mentioning that line of dolls shouldn't cause problems. Anyway, I like how this doll looks.

PlasticArtist · Post by **PlasticArtist** » Sun Jun 28, 2015 9:23 pm

Well I'm an ass man, I like looking at it from the back and hitting it from behind.

eeniemeenie · Post by **eeniemeenie** » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:16 pm

I'll figure out how to make it work.

Jimjam · Post by **Jimjam** » Mon Jun 29, 2015 5:42 am

Lightning wrote:It would be great to have a picture.

Alex77 posted the difference between an old and new ORdoll 156 (old E-Cup on the left, and B-Cup on the right) (Thanks Alex77).
But that's ORdoll

41[1].jpg
It would be nice if WM Dolls could also post this kind of picture from the 158 or 163 for example (if the 153 isn't ready yet).

I'm curently thinking of buying a TPE doll, either the 156-E from OR or the 158 from WM, without this kind of insurances I will go for sure to an OR

Wow, what a massive improvement OR Doll have made, THAT'S what i wanted to see, superb job. These dolls are now on my radar as something i would want to invest in. If you saw a real woman looking like the doll on the left, you'd think "WOAH now.....what's goin' on down there??" The doll on the right IMO is faultless. Anyway, even real women vary i little bit in their 'private' placement, but OR Doll are now just about where they need to be. Visuals are a big deal for me, and the new placement hits the nail right on.

If WM has made improvements, can we see some pictures please? If not, OR will get my money.

Jimjam

thelionking · Post by **thelionking** » Mon Jun 29, 2015 5:46 am

Jimjam wrote:
Lightning wrote:It would be great to have a picture.

Alex77 posted the difference between an old and new ORdoll 156 (old E-Cup on the left, and B-Cup on the right) (Thanks Alex77).
But that's ORdoll

41[1].jpg
It would be nice if WM Dolls could also post this kind of picture from the 158 or 163 for example (if the 153 isn't ready yet).

I'm curently thinking of buying a TPE doll, either the 156-E from OR or the 158 from WM, without this kind of insurances I will go for sure to an OR
Wow, what a massive improvement OR Doll have made, THAT'S what i wanted to see, superb job. These dolls are now on my radar as something i would want to invest in. If you saw a real woman looking like the doll on the left, you'd think "WOAH now.....what's goin' on down there??" The doll on the right IMO is faultless. Anyway, even real women vary i little bit in their 'private' placement, but OR Doll are now just about where they need to be. Visuals are a big deal for me, and the new placement hits the nail right on.

If WM has made improvements, can we see some pictures please? If not, OR will get my money.

Jimjam

Touche'