windave wrote:Give me correct placement and I will spend more at the orifice, maybe work later at the orifice.
I was one of the folks who was bothered about this a while back, and authored the thread referenced by Obin. I sent a PM to YourDoll asking if similar arrangements were to be looked at for future models, and they didn't respond. WM has stated they have fixed their design, and I've been confused by some of the photos I've seen. In some of them, they look the same as before, but in some others, they look almost correct.
As far as the OR new vs old models, I think it's such a drastic improvement, that any further correction would be so miniscule, that I'm able to leave well enough alone. I think the photo.. :
...shows the model on the right to be actually correct, if you take into account, as someone else mentioned, the pose of the spine. These dolls are lying with their backs flat, and legs pointing straight upward. The girls of porn, posing in the explicit photos provided are indeed in arched back poses, thus exposing the vagina in it's most posterior position. If a woman lays on her back in the same position as these dolls, I think the difference would not be noticeable. The perineum, however, is of course elongated further than is realistic, for damage prevention. This may be affecting the way the orifices are visually perceived.
Anyhow, I hope WM can demonstrate the updated versions of their beautiful dolls' bodies, in a similar fashion to the photo above. As long as we keep stating our observations in a diplomatic manner, the companies will make the proper adjustments, though it can take time, and there's bound to be confusion along the way.
