Orifice placement

Andromalius · Post by **Andromalius** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 9:27 pm

Anyone else think the orifice placement on the dolls is a bit too forward? I can't get a decent positioning from behind. The anus and vagina always seem to be pointing downward in a doggy position unless I really bend them, and even then, only the anus really seems accessible.

The orifices don't really move with the hips, but rather the whole torso. The anal opening is below the butt cheeks. The vaginal opening is usually too off center to bother with. When a woman arches her back, the vagina can have a slight upward angle of approach or straight ahead depending on how flexible they are, but with my 125, everything still points down.

The oral cavity pointing up also makes that function nearly useless.

Does anyone else have a similar experience or am I the odd man out?

Obin · Post by **Obin** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 10:56 pm

Although posted in another forum section, this thread contains a discussion on issues you state about TPE dolls.

http://dollforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=224&t=56393

Dragonfly suggested a fix in this thread. http://dollforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=224&t=57347

The oral angle is largely attributed to limits, since the head attachment structure is essentially located where a throat would be.

Tybalt · Post by **Tybalt** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 5:15 am

Asterix and Alex77 will tell you that the placement is ideal. I do not agree with them however. Unfortunately there is nothing you can do about it short of making your own modifications to create a 4th hole.

thelionking · Post by **thelionking** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 8:30 am

I like the idea of having a doll with no anal opening in order to have a correctly placed vaginal opening. I hope there will be a WM doll body that will incorporate this one day.

PlasticArtist · Post by **PlasticArtist** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 9:31 am

http://www.amazon.com/TLC-CyberSkin-Vib ... B00187RE5I

I think in one of the other threads on this subject someone posted a link to one of those.
It is made of TPE and the holes are in the right place

leelol · Post by **leelol** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 4:09 pm

Yup. those are great.
Interestingly, that same company sells full size, fixed position dolls, that are amazing looking, with almost no skeleton...
but still have the "holes too far forward" problem.

Odd thing, that.

leelol · Post by **leelol** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 5:17 pm

I wonder also, if the different skeleton models, have slightly different placement?

I looked up WM dolls in the matrix,
http://matrix.dollforum.com/search_sizi ... +by+Models
and looking at the only gallery for the "rigid" style skeleton

(143cm, Kyoko, http://www.dollforum.com/forum/viewtopi ... 15&t=59079 )
the v canal looks pretty properly placed..?

WM Dolls Affiliate · Post by **WM Dolls Affiliate** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 5:33 pm

Our dolls have vagina in right place now. This was changed on all TPE dolls from WM some time ago.
Also, we do not have different type of skeletons, only one. I don't know why this matrix has listed two different ones, it is not correct. Maybe the Matrix moderator could fix this?

Post by **Elle** » Sat Mar 07, 2015 6:16 am

WM Dolls Affiliate wrote:Our dolls have vagina in right place now. This was changed on all TPE dolls from WM some time ago.
Also, we do not have different type of skeletons, only one. I don't know why this matrix has listed two different ones, it is not correct. Maybe the Matrix moderator could fix this?

The Doll Matrix lists 5 different skeletons because their lengths ; and 2 types of joints : Flexible or Rigid (because the different comments of owners)
As a maker, do you consider your skeletons have Rigid or Flexible joints ?

Thanks for the answer

Elle

WM Dolls Affiliate · Post by **WM Dolls Affiliate** » Sat Mar 07, 2015 1:59 pm

Elle wrote:
WM Dolls Affiliate wrote:Our dolls have vagina in right place now. This was changed on all TPE dolls from WM some time ago.
Also, we do not have different type of skeletons, only one. I don't know why this matrix has listed two different ones, it is not correct. Maybe the Matrix moderator could fix this?

The Doll Matrix lists 5 different skeletons because their lengths ; and 2 types of joints : Flexible or Rigid (because the different comments of owners)
As a maker, do you consider your skeletons have Rigid or Flexible joints ?

Thanks for the answer

Elle

The joints are very stiff at first, but they loosen up over time, so it is difficult to put in one category

Hope that makes sense.

Tybalt · Post by **Tybalt** » Sat Mar 07, 2015 2:02 pm

WM Dolls Affiliate wrote:Our dolls have vagina in right place now. This was changed on all TPE dolls from WM some time ago.
Also, we do not have different type of skeletons, only one. I don't know why this matrix has listed two different ones, it is not correct. Maybe the Matrix moderator could fix this?

I am a bit skeptical.

can you have some guy do a video demonstration to show he can penetrate the vagina from that position? The anal is easy. I want to penetrate the vagina and clean up with the insert in the vagina for quick easy cleaning. Is this an inappropriate inquiry?

also please demonstrate this position. https://lyfeslyfe.files.wordpress.com/2 ... 003653.jpg

and do you finally put joints into the spine as a standard feature? Many silicone doll makers make it and dont charge extra.

Obin · Post by **Obin** » Sat Mar 07, 2015 2:30 pm

WM Dolls Affiliate wrote:
Elle wrote:
WM Dolls Affiliate wrote:Our dolls have vagina in right place now. This was changed on all TPE dolls from WM some time ago.
Also, we do not have different type of skeletons, only one. I don't know why this matrix has listed two different ones, it is not correct. Maybe the Matrix moderator could fix this?

The Doll Matrix lists 5 different skeletons because their lengths ; and 2 types of joints : Flexible or Rigid (because the different comments of owners)
As a maker, do you consider your skeletons have Rigid or Flexible joints ?

Thanks for the answer

Elle
The joints are very stiff at first, but they loosen up over time, so it is difficult to put in one category Hope that makes sense.

This is interesting. Maybe, a new classification would suffice.

sture · Post by **sture** » Sat Mar 07, 2015 3:33 pm

WM Dolls Affiliate wrote:Our dolls have vagina in right place now. This was changed on all TPE dolls from WM some time ago.
Also, we do not have different type of skeletons, only one. I don't know why this matrix has listed two different ones, it is not correct. Maybe the Matrix moderator could fix this?

Great news

Perhaps you have some new pics showing the corrected cavities ?
Why not a pic of the 153 cm doll?

WM Dolls Affiliate · Post by **WM Dolls Affiliate** » Sun Mar 08, 2015 4:24 am

The 153 cm doll is still being updated and is waiting for a re-release. We hope to finish this doll in March, but maybe take a bit longer.

thelionking · Post by **thelionking** » Sun Mar 08, 2015 12:56 pm

WM Dolls Affiliate wrote:Our dolls have vagina in right place now. This was changed on all TPE dolls from WM some time ago.
Also, we do not have different type of skeletons, only one. I don't know why this matrix has listed two different ones, it is not correct. Maybe the Matrix moderator could fix this?

Does anyone have pics of this correctly placed vagina? I have yet to see one.