WM 163 h-cup or 170 h-cup m-cup
WM 163 h-cup or 170 h-cup m-cup
I already own a 87cm Torso which is great. But because I want something for poses and fotography (and fun too), I want to get a new doll. I have seen Zenobia, Blade Kusanagi and Arias galleries and they are very impressive. Can other people also post some shots, preferably More doggy style and missionary positionings of their h/m-cup 163 and 170 dolls?
It is really difficult to decide.
- The Messenger
- Doll Elder
- Posts: 2385
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2018 9:16 pm
- Location: california
- Contact:
Re: WM 163 h-cup or 170 h-cup m-cup
I was working on the exact same question last year.
The 163 H-cup was my first choice but that 170 M-cup was oh so tempting.
Needless to say I went with the Jasmine. I'm more about the hips than the chest.
Now here I am a year later and a year wiser?
my 2 cents.
If this is your first doll, my advice would be to go for the lighter doll.
They are both beautiful and both heavy.
But the 170 is about 17lbs lighter or so they say.
It could make a difference everything else being equal to you.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2018 9:46 pm
- Location: Alberta Canada
- Contact:
Re: WM 163 h-cup or 170 h-cup m-cup
I would definitely second this suggestion. I myself was seduced by the mighty Jasmine's curves but her weight is too much. Her joints are no longer stiff and she cannot stand anymore to support all that weight. Fortunately for me she spends most of her time in bed anyway.The Messenger wrote:Ha, Ha, what a conundrum you have.
I was working on the exact same question last year.
The 163 H-cup was my first choice but that 170 M-cup was oh so tempting.
Needless to say I went with the Jasmine. I'm more about the hips than the chest.
Now here I am a year later and a year wiser?
my 2 cents.
If this is your first doll, my advice would be to go for the lighter doll.
They are both beautiful and both heavy.
But the 170 is about 17lbs lighter or so they say.
It could make a difference everything else being equal to you.
- Peonyou101
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 827
- Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: California, USA
- Contact:
Re: WM 163 h-cup or 170 h-cup m-cup
And for the pictures your looking for use the search function on right top and type in the dolls your looking for and I'm sure you will find pictures of what your looking for
Re: WM 163 h-cup or 170 h-cup m-cup
My reasons for 170 is primarily the weight, looks are just bomb on 163. Also the fact that the joints get lose over the year already on 163 is a bummer.
As for smaller dolls, the very small but busty ones are hard to find outfits that fit tightly. The others, at least from wm, which are 150cm + dont have such nice bodies. The 152 would be an alternative, but I doubt most outfits fit tightly unless I find a very good cloth vendor.
I have a 87cm wm torso which has similar torso measurements like the 170 m cup and I need s size European so the clothes are tight. Now imagine I go smaller, that means xs or less, which is really difficult, and I have no access to the asian clothing market which I see as the only possibility to be able to get fitting cloths for 140-150 models.
Re: WM 163 h-cup or 170 h-cup m-cup
The Jasmine doll really lit me up, but after looking at her measurements, she's a little too thick for me.
I know I wanted a taller doll, I like long legs. After ogling the various WM dolls, I pretty much came down to either the 170H or the 170M and since I also like breasts that can't be contained, I went with the 170M. If I had to do it again, I would choose the 170H instead as she looks better in shirts, .
You are correct that the 170 has a really small waist (at 21 inches), but it's not too thin from the side. There is enough TPE flesh in her waist for a good bear hug. I think it's the size of the M cups that make the waist look really small, but the H cups do look a bit better on that frame.
What I like about the 170 body overall is the slim fit look, the muscle definition on her back, and her legs are not super thin twigs.
Re: WM 163 h-cup or 170 h-cup m-cup
Re: WM 163 h-cup or 170 h-cup m-cup
Re: WM 163 h-cup or 170 h-cup m-cup
@ That guy
Thanks for the pic. Nice. Is your 170H insertable or built in?
One of the pics that caught my eye:
download/file.php?id=538884&mode=view
It is from this post:
viewtopic.php?p=1514037&sid=d15bb438f4f ... 2#p1514037
I ll wait a bit then decide which doll I ll go with.
Thanks for your input every one!
Re: WM 163 h-cup or 170 h-cup m-cup
Re: WM 163 h-cup or 170 h-cup m-cup
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 398
- Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2017 3:21 pm
- Location: texas
- Contact:
Re: WM 163 h-cup or 170 h-cup m-cup
- The Messenger
- Doll Elder
- Posts: 2385
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2018 9:16 pm
- Location: california
- Contact:
Re: WM 163 h-cup or 170 h-cup m-cup
Hey btasqan,btasqan wrote:Which is better?
I already own a 87cm Torso which is great. But because I want something for poses and fotography (and fun too), I want to get a new doll. I have seen Zenobia, Blade Kusanagi and Arias galleries and they are very impressive. Can other people also post some shots, preferably More doggy style and missionary positionings of their h/m-cup 163 and 170 dolls?
It is really difficult to decide.
I can't say which is better.
But I can say what's on sale right now.
https://reallovesexdolls.com/2-170cm-m-cup-149/
Re: WM 163 h-cup or 170 h-cup m-cup
I understand the doll isnt new and vag is fixed. Does anyone here have experience with RLSD shipping to Europe?
-
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 669
- Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2018 4:23 pm
- Contact: