Does anyone have the 174g without gel breasts?

TheKruseMissile · Post by **TheKruseMissile** » Sat Mar 06, 2021 11:23 pm

So I'm thinking about getting this doll, but one thing is stopping me. I'm not a huge fan of how the gel breasts make them sag and droop to the sides. I get it's more realistic, but it's not a look I'm into. The pics I can find of the doll seem to have the gel, as far as I can tell. I'm curious how they look in the solid or hollow varieties, and if it makes the breasts more centered.

If anyone has a non-gel version of this doll, I would love to see how they look. Thanks for any help you can give.

Dollover2000 · Post by **Dollover2000** » Sun Mar 07, 2021 12:03 am

I just bought one recently. She has hollow breasts. Here’s a factory pic and one from after she arrived. I prefer the hollow myself (having dolls with both). WM is starting to make their breasts more naturally droopy anyway so I don’t think the gel is needed unless you’re going for the true “feel”.

TheKruseMissile · Post by **TheKruseMissile** » Sun Mar 07, 2021 12:31 am

Ah, thanks. I think that confirms that this doll is not for me. I really don't like how far to the sides the breasts are resting.

Think I might go with the 168e. Seems like it's more to my preferences.

Post by **bigchilli** » Sun Mar 07, 2021 5:49 am

TheKruseMissile wrote:So I'm thinking about getting this doll, but one thing is stopping me. I'm not a huge fan of how the gel breasts make them sag and droop to the sides. I get it's more realistic, but it's not a look I'm into. The pics I can find of the doll seem to have the gel, as far as I can tell. I'm curious how they look in the solid or hollow varieties, and if it makes the breasts more centered.

If anyone has a non-gel version of this doll, I would love to see how they look. Thanks for any help you can give.

Funny, I just posted a thread about the exact same issue with gel breasts,although I was looking at the 164J
I'm also not into the super realistic look
Now the 162F is top of my list

Dollover2000 · Post by **Dollover2000** » Sun Mar 07, 2021 2:26 pm

TheKruseMissile wrote:Ah, thanks. I think that confirms that this doll is not for me. I really don't like how far to the sides the breasts are resting.

Think I might go with the 168e. Seems like it's more to my preferences.

The 168E is my all time favorite! Keep in mind there are TWO different versions. They resculpted it slightly to shave excess weight. I personally prefer the original model over the newer one, although I have multiples of both. The original version is basically the ultimate female measurements. 36-24-36.
If it comes down to you deciding on getting one and you can’t find illustrations of both models, I can help you out.

TheKruseMissile · Post by **TheKruseMissile** » Sun Mar 07, 2021 4:35 pm

Dollover2000 wrote:
TheKruseMissile wrote:Ah, thanks. I think that confirms that this doll is not for me. I really don't like how far to the sides the breasts are resting.

Think I might go with the 168e. Seems like it's more to my preferences.
The 168E is my all time favorite! Keep in mind there are TWO different versions. They resculpted it slightly to shave excess weight. I personally prefer the original model over the newer one, although I have multiples of both. The original version is basically the ultimate female measurements. 36-24-36.
If it comes down to you deciding on getting one and you can’t find illustrations of both models, I can help you out.

You know, I had a feeling this was the case. A little while ago I was looking at pictures, and I noticed a lot of the more recent ones looked a LOT different from older posts, and from the old photo shoots that stores use to promote it.

Is it even possible to get the older version, because the newer version definitely seems to have saggier breasts and I don’t like that.

Dollover2000 · Post by **Dollover2000** » Sun Mar 07, 2021 6:30 pm

TheKruseMissile wrote:
Dollover2000 wrote:
TheKruseMissile wrote:Ah, thanks. I think that confirms that this doll is not for me. I really don't like how far to the sides the breasts are resting.

Think I might go with the 168e. Seems like it's more to my preferences.
The 168E is my all time favorite! Keep in mind there are TWO different versions. They resculpted it slightly to shave excess weight. I personally prefer the original model over the newer one, although I have multiples of both. The original version is basically the ultimate female measurements. 36-24-36.
If it comes down to you deciding on getting one and you can’t find illustrations of both models, I can help you out.
You know, I had a feeling this was the case. A little while ago I was looking at pictures, and I noticed a lot of the more recent ones looked a LOT different from older posts, and from the old photo shoots that stores use to promote it.

Is it even possible to get the older version, because the newer version definitely seems to have saggier breasts and I don’t like that.

You can still get the older version. But you have to request it. The new version is the default.