Interested in buying a WM 162b

Thelord001 · Post by **Thelord001** » Thu Aug 16, 2018 5:01 am

Think i have finally found a doll that looks like a normal, healthy girl with realistic proposions. I think the WM 162b looks awesome. Just looking for some opinions here, is this body a good choice or does it have some known problem? Would be great to hear opinions from other 162 owners.

amytyl · Post by **amytyl** » Thu Aug 16, 2018 10:18 am

viewtopic.php?f=267&t=102600
She's great proportion wise and WM made a few changes to enhance her vaginal durability for inserts, plus she's got a hinged neck. However, I would recommend the C cup version (I ordered mine to beat the tariffs, and then a few weeks later they released that one.).

nicvncnt · Post by **nicvncnt** » Sat Aug 18, 2018 1:46 pm

I'm starting to lean towards the C-cup as well, the vag position seems more natural.

Thelord001 · Post by **Thelord001** » Wed Aug 22, 2018 3:08 am

Are there any other differences between the B and C cup version?

amytyl · Post by **amytyl** » Wed Aug 22, 2018 12:28 pm

Not that I've noticed.

manfredixon · Post by **manfredixon** » Fri Sep 07, 2018 3:30 pm

Thelord001 wrote:Think i have finally found a doll that looks like a normal, healthy girl with realistic proposions. I think the WM 162b looks awesome. Just looking for some opinions here, is this body a good choice or does it have some known problem? Would be great to hear opinions from other 162 owners.

I gotta agree with you here; "healthy/realistic" proportions is a real pain to find in the doll world, but the WM 162 seems to have really nailed it!! I just ordered an IronTech 155cm last week, which (hopefully) also seems good.

Checking out the WM162 really make me want her too... damn!

One thing worries me though; I can't seem to find the 162 on the WM website - it's not discontinued, is it?

And does anyone know if there is any other physical difference between the B and C cup models, apart from bust size?

This could VERY well be the hottest doll I've ever seen...