YL 165 Unboxing Photos

TheGateKeeper · Post by **TheGateKeeper** » Thu Apr 26, 2018 7:13 pm

Yeah thats what I was afraid of. Too bad because her body is basically perfect otherwise. Thanks for the pic.

LonelyDude · Post by **LonelyDude** » Thu Apr 26, 2018 7:50 pm

TheGateKeeper wrote:Yeah thats what I was afraid of. Too bad because her body is basically perfect otherwise. Thanks for the pic.

Sorry to be a downer. I think the dolls privates were designed for from the front action. I noticed that on my silicone doll, its perfect position of the butthole and vagina if you do the doggy but from the front its the reverse--the privates slope down in an unnatural position where you would have to bend your wiener or something unless you lifted the legs up and pushed them forward toward the torso. I have not played with the silicone doll for sex but it definitely would be better for the doggy style than missionary based on hole placements. Given the nature of silicone and TPE, I dont know if its possible to have perfect placements for all positions. These dolls dont have skin and muscle that changes the way they present themselves like the human body does when it bends.

sly · Post by **sly** » Fri Apr 27, 2018 7:33 pm

Great choice!

I apologize if this was already mentioned, but is this doll of the fixed or inserted vagina variety?

PaulDenton2001 · Post by **PaulDenton2001** » Sat Apr 28, 2018 1:14 pm

LonelyDude wrote: Sorry I forgot. Here is a snapshot with a tape measure. Unfortunately, I don't think this doll will be good for the doggy style sex position. This refers only to the doll I received and nobody else's. Also, this refers only to this particular position and orientation of the doll --kneeling with calves bent perpendicular to thighs and thighs vertical with back parallel to ground. This is better suited for the missionary position or doll on top IMO..The butthole is barely showing when the doll is bent over. It just begins where the circle is. The vagina cannot even be seen.

Well that's disappointing :/

LonelyDude · Post by **LonelyDude** » Sat Apr 28, 2018 1:25 pm

sly wrote:Great choice!

I apologize if this was already mentioned, but is this doll of the fixed or inserted vagina variety?

Either. You make the decision when you buy the doll. I chose to get the removable inserts over the fixed.

LonelyDude · Post by **LonelyDude** » Sat Apr 28, 2018 1:27 pm

PaulDenton2001 wrote:
LonelyDude wrote: Sorry I forgot. Here is a snapshot with a tape measure. Unfortunately, I don't think this doll will be good for the doggy style sex position. This refers only to the doll I received and nobody else's. Also, this refers only to this particular position and orientation of the doll --kneeling with calves bent perpendicular to thighs and thighs vertical with back parallel to ground. This is better suited for the missionary position or doll on top IMO..The butthole is barely showing when the doll is bent over. It just begins where the circle is. The vagina cannot even be seen.
Well that's disappointing :/

On the flip side, if you prefer missionary or other front positions it will be more realistic placement.

PaulDenton2001 · Post by **PaulDenton2001** » Sat Apr 28, 2018 2:34 pm

LonelyDude wrote:
PaulDenton2001 wrote:
LonelyDude wrote: Sorry I forgot. Here is a snapshot with a tape measure. Unfortunately, I don't think this doll will be good for the doggy style sex position. This refers only to the doll I received and nobody else's. Also, this refers only to this particular position and orientation of the doll --kneeling with calves bent perpendicular to thighs and thighs vertical with back parallel to ground. This is better suited for the missionary position or doll on top IMO..The butthole is barely showing when the doll is bent over. It just begins where the circle is. The vagina cannot even be seen.
Well that's disappointing :/

On the flip side, if you prefer missionary or other front positions it will be more realistic placement.

Yeah I agree, that does look pretty good

aztec25ac · Post by **aztec25ac** » Mon May 14, 2018 7:07 pm

Anymore pics OP?

avante · Post by **avante** » Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:01 am

So I know this is kinda old thread, just wanted to say thanks for the pic with measuring tape to get some better view of things

. Apparently YL has changed the anus position at least, tho if just the anus and not the vagina position, I can see from this pic doggy will def be a issue...For the life of me I cannot understand why a doll with such an ass is designed for missionary.

Well like some have said before, YL170 is prolly way better for doggy and the vagina does look nicer as pro's to the 170. But to me the upper body and waist are a bit more thinner looking as negatives vs the 165. Well, just wanted to say thanks for the picture from way before

. You even went and got that 170 too?

Post by **Booty Call Dolls** » Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:13 am

Yes, this is a very good thread.
When people , we will ask questions that most vendors (except maybe Sandro) would not ask.
If someone wants a 6YE and we know they want doggie then we tell them they need to rule out 6YE ( not AMOR) dolls and looks elsewhere.
Best,
Jeff and Nyoko