YL 165 Unboxing Photos
-
- Contributing Poster
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 6:04 am
- Contact:
Re: YL 165 Unboxing Photos
- LonelyDude
- Senior Member
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2018 3:15 pm
- Contact:
Re: YL 165 Unboxing Photos
TheGateKeeper wrote:Yeah thats what I was afraid of. Too bad because her body is basically perfect otherwise. Thanks for the pic.
Sorry to be a downer. I think the dolls privates were designed for from the front action. I noticed that on my silicone doll, its perfect position of the butthole and vagina if you do the doggy but from the front its the reverse--the privates slope down in an unnatural position where you would have to bend your wiener or something unless you lifted the legs up and pushed them forward toward the torso. I have not played with the silicone doll for sex but it definitely would be better for the doggy style than missionary based on hole placements. Given the nature of silicone and TPE, I dont know if its possible to have perfect placements for all positions. These dolls dont have skin and muscle that changes the way they present themselves like the human body does when it bends.
Re: YL 165 Unboxing Photos
I apologize if this was already mentioned, but is this doll of the fixed or inserted vagina variety?
- PaulDenton2001
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 866
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:24 am
- Contact:
Re: YL 165 Unboxing Photos
Well that's disappointing :/LonelyDude wrote: Sorry I forgot. Here is a snapshot with a tape measure. Unfortunately, I don't think this doll will be good for the doggy style sex position. This refers only to the doll I received and nobody else's. Also, this refers only to this particular position and orientation of the doll --kneeling with calves bent perpendicular to thighs and thighs vertical with back parallel to ground. This is better suited for the missionary position or doll on top IMO..The butthole is barely showing when the doll is bent over. It just begins where the circle is. The vagina cannot even be seen.
- LonelyDude
- Senior Member
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2018 3:15 pm
- Contact:
Re: YL 165 Unboxing Photos
sly wrote:Great choice!
I apologize if this was already mentioned, but is this doll of the fixed or inserted vagina variety?
Either. You make the decision when you buy the doll. I chose to get the removable inserts over the fixed.
- LonelyDude
- Senior Member
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2018 3:15 pm
- Contact:
Re: YL 165 Unboxing Photos
PaulDenton2001 wrote:Well that's disappointing :/LonelyDude wrote: Sorry I forgot. Here is a snapshot with a tape measure. Unfortunately, I don't think this doll will be good for the doggy style sex position. This refers only to the doll I received and nobody else's. Also, this refers only to this particular position and orientation of the doll --kneeling with calves bent perpendicular to thighs and thighs vertical with back parallel to ground. This is better suited for the missionary position or doll on top IMO..The butthole is barely showing when the doll is bent over. It just begins where the circle is. The vagina cannot even be seen.
On the flip side, if you prefer missionary or other front positions it will be more realistic placement.
- PaulDenton2001
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 866
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:24 am
- Contact:
Re: YL 165 Unboxing Photos
Yeah I agree, that does look pretty goodLonelyDude wrote:PaulDenton2001 wrote:Well that's disappointing :/LonelyDude wrote: Sorry I forgot. Here is a snapshot with a tape measure. Unfortunately, I don't think this doll will be good for the doggy style sex position. This refers only to the doll I received and nobody else's. Also, this refers only to this particular position and orientation of the doll --kneeling with calves bent perpendicular to thighs and thighs vertical with back parallel to ground. This is better suited for the missionary position or doll on top IMO..The butthole is barely showing when the doll is bent over. It just begins where the circle is. The vagina cannot even be seen.
On the flip side, if you prefer missionary or other front positions it will be more realistic placement.
Re: YL 165 Unboxing Photos
- avante
- Doll Mentor
- Posts: 1700
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2017 11:23 am
- Location: Holland - the Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: YL 165 Unboxing Photos
Well like some have said before, YL170 is prolly way better for doggy and the vagina does look nicer as pro's to the 170. But to me the upper body and waist are a bit more thinner looking as negatives vs the 165. Well, just wanted to say thanks for the picture from way before . You even went and got that 170 too?
My doll experience : WM 158D tales & pics: viewtopic.php?f=215&t=85063&start=465
- Booty Call Dolls
- VENDOR
- Posts: 23822
- Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 3:49 pm
- Contact:
Re: YL 165 Unboxing Photos
When people , we will ask questions that most vendors (except maybe Sandro) would not ask.
If someone wants a 6YE and we know they want doggie then we tell them they need to rule out 6YE ( not AMOR) dolls and looks elsewhere.
Best,
Jeff and Nyoko