Why not a 161cm girl

stones · Post by **stones** » Sat May 28, 2016 6:23 am

I don't want to be argumentative or derail the thread, please understand I absolutely love the look of the 161 and would exercise every day and bolt a winch into the ceiling to handle her, but look at all the for sale threads where people say they are selling because of weight. Also look at the number of people right here commenting on it for this particular doll. It is a real concern, and one that is completely fixable with engineering. I'm not saying it won't be more expensive to use more exotic materials or figure out a new way to cut a few kilos, but I and probably others would pay more for aluminum or carbon fiber or whatever. I think 25-30 kilos is achievable and I think would make a big difference. Maybe the extra 7 kilos over a comparable doll is no big deal, but imagine if they all were 25 or less - I think that would expand the market to more less physically capable people.

zodiac · Post by **zodiac** » Sat May 28, 2016 11:35 am

They are beautiful dolls, but the people who post about the weight (and hopefully respectful about it) are making a valid point about a legitimate concern, and it is certainly a strong consideration in a purchaser's decision. If you told me to pay even $1k more to lower the weight by 10 or more kgs, I would without hesitation. When the manufacturers realize they can target a larger sales' demographic they will make necessary adjustments for their next doll designs and/or productions and we all win.

I am torn between 3 doll types for the next doll I purchase to replace an old one that I'm getting rid of. My personal considerations in order are: Appearance, Weight, Height, Material, Seller's rep and lastly; Price.

The 161 is definitely still one of my 3 that I'm thinking of!

irishgirl · Post by **irishgirl** » Sat May 28, 2016 6:56 pm

stones wrote:I don't want to be argumentative or derail the thread, please understand I absolutely love the look of the 161 and would exercise every day and bolt a winch into the ceiling to handle her, but look at all the for sale threads where people say they are selling because of weight. Also look at the number of people right here commenting on it for this particular doll. It is a real concern, and one that is completely fixable with engineering. I'm not saying it won't be more expensive to use more exotic materials or figure out a new way to cut a few kilos, but I and probably others would pay more for aluminum or carbon fiber or whatever. I think 25-30 kilos is achievable and I think would make a big difference. Maybe the extra 7 kilos over a comparable doll is no big deal, but imagine if they all were 25 or less - I think that would expand the market to more less physically capable people.

I agree with you stones and zodiac!

@FiveByFive, IMO, That is exactly what this forum is about. The ability to search for each individuals answers and questions to decide which would work best for their situation!! I'm a Woman, and so, as I commented (respectfully) as zodiac said,) WOW, I wish I could handle her! So before you make such a harsh and judging comment like ''piddly ole weight'' just stop and think about individuality and that everyone has different needs for different reasons! I personally was in no way saying anything negative about these BEAUTIFUL DOLLS.. They are all beautiful and again, They are the opinions of the people. That's it..

Post by **beautifuldolls** » Sun May 29, 2016 4:02 am

stones wrote:I don't want to be argumentative or derail the thread, please understand I absolutely love the look of the 161 and would exercise every day and bolt a winch into the ceiling to handle her, but look at all the for sale threads where people say they are selling because of weight. Also look at the number of people right here commenting on it for this particular doll. It is a real concern, and one that is completely fixable with engineering. I'm not saying it won't be more expensive to use more exotic materials or figure out a new way to cut a few kilos, but I and probably others would pay more for aluminum or carbon fiber or whatever. I think 25-30 kilos is achievable and I think would make a big difference. Maybe the extra 7 kilos over a comparable doll is no big deal, but imagine if they all were 25 or less - I think that would expand the market to more less physically capable people.

I understand the weight issue and have been talking with makers. I am sure it's just a matter of time we will have news..

acrux · Post by **acrux** » Sun May 29, 2016 5:02 am

beautifuldolls wrote:I understand the weight issue and have been talking with makers. I am sure it's just a matter of time we will have news..

That sounds promising! I too would be willing to pay more for less (weight). I want a life size doll (min. 145 cm, preferably 155-170 cm) and have no problems lifting and carrying 35-40 kg, but did own a 29 kg high-end doll and found it irritatingly cumbersome to maneuver. 25 kg or less with head would be just great.

Xephyr · Post by **Xephyr** » Sun May 29, 2016 5:21 am

I think I might be suffering from some strong infatuation. It's a face that's been around forever but have long slipped my radar until these photos came about.

FML.... She looks so good >_< Voluptuous, head is a wee bit small, but still I like. Were there any improvements to her vagina and anal design from other models?

I guess weight isn't really a concern for me these days, with less and less visitors, and I don't take my current doll out of bed at all. I dress, play with, clean and powder her right in bed.