Anastasia in natural lighting

Zippy81 · Post by **Zippy81** » Tue Jul 10, 2018 9:51 pm

Yea I contacted them but it might be to late as the order was submitted to the factory on that saturday. Waiting to hear back. Idk.. I saw the pic below of a 168 and the calf area looks very small and the boobs look kind of balloon shaped compared to your ana. Things look disproportionate but then again it could be the camera angle and maybe that particular head is big for the body type which could throw things off. I asked this morning if I could switch my order to the 162b instead. Anyways I saw this picture on the sales thread.

DSC_0385.JPG

Panther68 · Post by **Panther68** » Wed Jul 11, 2018 5:16 am

Hey Zippy,

I think you will be fine. Anastasia pretty much looks like this when naked. In fact, she is currently naked, as I am working on getting a couple months of dark lint off of her. I will take some photos her and post them, so you can compare. Will have them by late morning for you.

Zippy81 · Post by **Zippy81** » Wed Jul 11, 2018 6:22 am

She said the 168 would be done by Friday so it was to late. I think i will be fine also. I think i just wanted the 162b body more and didn't realize it until i saw a photoshoot put up by BCD. Man lint must be a killer! I'd like to see the comparison pics allot but don't trouble yourself if it's a pain at all!

i'll be glad when August gets here so i can get back to doing photoshoots.

Dr Dollinger · Post by **Dr Dollinger** » Wed Jul 11, 2018 10:59 pm

Maybe it's really the camera angle and a bad light

The WM 168E is still a great doll!

Here are some good comparison pictures from Jeff with the same head

https://www.dollforum.com/forum/viewtop ... 70&start=0

Zippy81 · Post by **Zippy81** » Thu Jul 12, 2018 6:16 am

Yea you're right doc!

Panther68 · Post by **Panther68** » Mon Jul 23, 2018 10:15 pm

It's been awhile since posting on this thread, as I have been giving Anastasia a break. Heck, Zippy has been on here, more than me, lately.

Anyways, finishing up showing the shoot I started back in early June, with Anastasia and Anya wear the animal print dress. These shots are emphasizing Anastasia a bit more.

Boobman · Post by **Boobman** » Tue Jul 24, 2018 2:47 am

Dr Dollinger wrote:Maybe it's really the camera angle and a bad light

The WM 168E is still a great doll!

Here are some good comparison pictures from Jeff with the same head

https://www.dollforum.com/forum/viewtop ... 70&start=0

The 168E (the doll on the left with "Ujana" head) in these pics is the older version like Panthers Anastasia.

strokelover · Post by **strokelover** » Tue Jul 24, 2018 4:14 pm

Love the nipples on the right one!

Post by **brigittes hubbie** » Tue Jul 24, 2018 4:46 pm

Panther68 wrote:It's been awhile since posting on this thread, as I have been giving Anastasia a break. Heck, Zippy has been on here, more than me, lately.

Anyways, finishing up showing the shoot I started back in early June, with Anastasia and Anya wear the animal print dress. These shots are emphasizing Anastasia a bit more.

I´m still amazed by these outfits!

Chris

Panther68 · Post by **Panther68** » Tue Jul 24, 2018 6:50 pm

I´m still amazed by these outfits!

Chris

Thanks Chris, good to hear from you after a couple of weeks. I can now really appreciate doll owners with multiple dolls. Especially, Arthur, who has 8 dolls and 9 threads going on.

strokelover wrote:Love the nipples on the right one!

That's the WM 170

The 168E (the doll on the left with "Ujana" head) in these pics is the older version like Panthers Anastasia.

I do agree, the older and newer WM 168, do look a bit different.

Zippy81 · Post by **Zippy81** » Tue Jul 24, 2018 7:23 pm

Yea

I have to live through your 168 pics panther! Mine is twiggy.. I'm going to do a dress photo shoot too after I fix Taylor's wrists. I love the animal skins dress pics you just posted. I feel as my 168 just isn't going to be that photogenic.. I'm certain your model is different than mine.. the legs and arms are skin and bones.

Boobman · Post by **Boobman** » Tue Jul 24, 2018 7:50 pm

Zippy81 wrote:Yea I have to live through your 168 pics panther! Mine is twiggy.. I'm going to do a dress photo shoot too after I fix Taylor's wrists. I love the animal skins dress pics you just posted. I feel as my 168 just isn't going to be that photogenic.. I'm certain your model is different than mine.. the legs and arms are skin and bones.

Clothed you may not even notice the difference if less meaty in arms & legs it should be lighter so that's a plus. Shrugging shoulders if standard on the new version will help some with upper body poses. Genuine WM dolls are pretty good dolls. Anastasia may not be my doll but as i have said before my 2 dolls Jeannie & Vanellope & i would enjoy her company.

Zippy81 · Post by **Zippy81** » Tue Jul 24, 2018 8:28 pm

Yea i'll keep her. I just might not do many photoshoots of her.

Panther68 · Post by **Panther68** » Tue Jul 24, 2018 8:34 pm

Hey Zippy, I am sure with your skills, you can bring out the best with your doll. Give it some time.

I was the same with Anya. She is a twig compared to Anastasia. My first week, I just could not find that "look" for her. Went back to my initial vision of her as a beach blonde bikini model. Now, she rocks that look. As the newbie, Anastasia was not too happy that Anya was the doll to get "The Shot" Anya on the convertible, sunrise above the fog shot. Doll wars, the battle for attention. This is sounding like Endless War's thread, who by the way is only on the other side of the bay from me. Bay Area dolls, just like Bay Area women, attention whores.....Opps, did I say that out loud. JK......