167 EVO or 163 +

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o 8O :? 8) :lol: :whistle: :x :P :razz: :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :lying: :fadein: :fist: 0X :drinking: :thumbs_down: :angel: :thumbs_up: :painting: :evidence: :grab: :multi: :plaidskirt: :sleeping: :haha4: :puppydogeyes: :morning: :evilbat: :glou: :deadhorse: :shakefist:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: 167 EVO or 163 +

Re: 167 EVO or 163 +

by Kazuya » Fri Feb 23, 2018 6:49 pm

haremlover wrote:The 167 of last year had an insert and cavity opening that in my experience was too small but I think the EVO is a response to that. If successful the EVO knocks all other dolls sideways hands down.

In my opinion, and perhaps it was just the skeleton position in my 163+, the front of the thighs aren't padded enough to be comfortable for cuddling from the front laying on top of her.

So I'd go for the 167EVO any day.

Keep an eye open for new reports coming in but I think you can be reasonably confident that she's as near perfection as they come.

Best wishes

Harem
It’s worth noting that the fixed vagina on the 167 Evo is very, very tight.

Re: 167 EVO or 163 +

by haremlover » Fri Feb 23, 2018 1:41 pm

The 167 of last year had an insert and cavity opening that in my experience was too small but I think the EVO is a response to that. If successful the EVO knocks all other dolls sideways hands down.

In my opinion, and perhaps it was just the skeleton position in my 163+, the front of the thighs aren't padded enough to be comfortable for cuddling from the front laying on top of her.

So I'd go for the 167EVO any day.

Keep an eye open for new reports coming in but I think you can be reasonably confident that she's as near perfection as they come.

Best wishes

Harem

Re: 167 EVO or 163 +

by MannyCan » Fri Feb 23, 2018 1:07 pm

I have a DS163+ - really love it. I will say that I have some complaints around the insert and insert cavity. Most DS163/163+ owners have to end up gluing the inserts.

So I'd say .. for photos DS163+ is better. For sex .. maybe DS167 is better. Especially now that EVO is available for DS167. EVO won't be available for DS163+.

And definitely the doll shapes are very different. DS163+ was a better shape for me personally. DS167 was a bit more hip and back heavy. A lot of guys are into that. Just just happen to like a more "sporty" model.

Re: 167 EVO or 163 +

by Dollstudio » Fri Feb 16, 2018 8:00 am

blondLab wrote:Decisions, decisions . . . curious what people think, should I get a 167 EVO or a 163+ . . .
Both are very different dolls. Which doll fits to you best depends on the body shape you like (rather peite or curvy), the vagina type you prefer (insert vs. built-in), and your budget.

Sandro

Re: 167 EVO or 163 +

by ccrider32759 » Fri Feb 16, 2018 6:53 am

Both bodies are excellent choices. I found myself liking the Sharon and Leaf faces for the evo. Putting price aside and just going by choice would be the evo.

167 EVO or 163 +

by blondLab » Fri Feb 16, 2018 6:10 am

Decisions, decisions . . . curious what people think, should I get a 167 EVO or a 163+ . . .

Top

INFORMATIONS