Page 6 of 7

Re: 158 LeAnne and 162 Krissy body comparison

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:32 am
by PassionDolls
Mcupplease wrote:Dear Doug at Passion Dolls,
I just wanted to pester you one more time to commission a Leanne top on a Penelope bottom doll sculpture.
What is wrong with LeAnne's butt mate? Or is it just the height you want.

Re: 158 LeAnne and 162 Krissy body comparison

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:54 pm
by Mcupplease
Good morning Doug , I am a great admirer of your inspired projects.
Leanne is in a class all her own and I have come so close to pushing the button. I am from the generation of admiring the "Sticks with Tits" body type, and by tits I mean Leanne size volleyball breasts. I never did get on board with the Kim Kardashian craze that seems to be pervasive through many of the members here. So I chose keep waiting until I see Leanne upper body combined with the gorgeous slender Penelope lower body. Meanwhile I bought the SH165 Rcup as a compromise.
SmartSelectImage_2017-12-02-10-02-55.png
SmartSelectImage_2017-12-02-10-02-55.png (1.15 MiB) Viewed 2764 times
SmartSelectImage_2017-12-02-10-12-26.png
SmartSelectImage_2017-12-02-10-12-26.png (1.41 MiB) Viewed 2764 times
SmartSelectImage_2017-12-02-10-10-48.png
SmartSelectImage_2017-12-02-10-10-48.png (1.16 MiB) Viewed 2764 times
SmartSelectImage_2017-12-02-10-05-35.png
SmartSelectImage_2017-12-02-10-05-35.png (1.65 MiB) Viewed 2764 times
SmartSelectImage_2017-12-02-10-03-34.png
SmartSelectImage_2017-12-02-10-03-34.png (1.43 MiB) Viewed 2764 times
SmartSelectImage_2017-12-02-10-01-01.png
SmartSelectImage_2017-12-02-10-01-01.png (1.2 MiB) Viewed 2764 times
SmartSelectImage_2017-12-02-09-59-30.png
SmartSelectImage_2017-12-02-09-59-30.png (1.69 MiB) Viewed 2764 times
Maybe there is a significant segment of the market that is of the same mind. Several people have posted on my threads supporting what I'm saying here.
I'm hoping maybe you or one of the other manufacturers might give some consideration to this wish vision of mine.
I actually have the plaster mold of this model's breasts - Minka is her name. More than happy to share or provide it.

Re: 158 LeAnne and 162 Krissy body comparison

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 9:22 pm
by PassionDolls
Mcupplease wrote:Good morning Doug , I am a great admirer of your inspired projects.
Leanne is in a class all her own and I have come so close to pushing the button. I am from the generation of admiring the "Sticks with Tits" body type, and by tits I mean Leanne size volleyball breasts. I never did get on board with the Kim Kardashian craze that seems to be pervasive through many of the members here. So I chose keep waiting until I see Leanne upper body combined with the gorgeous slender Penelope lower body. Meanwhile I bought the SH165 Rcup as a compromise.

Maybe there is a significant segment of the market that is of the same mind. Several people have posted on my threads supporting what I'm saying here.
I'm hoping maybe you or one of the other manufacturers might give some consideration to this wish vision of mine.
I actually have the plaster mold of this model's breasts - Minka is her name. More than happy to share or provide it.
If there is enough interest, I'll make one. If people are serious and if I can get a commitment of just 15 order with a deposit of non-refundable $100, I can make one.

Re: 158 LeAnne and 162 Krissy body comparison

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 9:33 pm
by PassionDolls
edit: wrong post.

Re: 158 LeAnne and 162 Krissy body comparison

Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 10:47 pm
by horndude
Mcupplease wrote:Maybe there is a significant segment of the market that is of the same mind. Several people have posted on my threads supporting what I'm saying here.
I'm hoping maybe you or one of the other manufacturers might give some consideration to this wish vision of mine.
I actually have the plaster mold of this model's breasts - Minka is her name. More than happy to share or provide it.
Though I LOVE Leeanne look too, I'd strongly consider supporting something like this. Would need more information to verify my interest. All I do know though is the Minka look (plus LethaWeapons, WendyWhoppers, TiffanyTowers, and LisaLipps) is an extremely attractive look for me.

Also Mcup, where did you get a Minka boob mold?? I'm have a huge boob fetish and that's very interesting to me. Was it on sale?

Re: 158 LeAnne and 162 Krissy body comparison

Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 11:57 pm
by Mcupplease
PassionDolls wrote:
Mcupplease wrote:Good morning Doug , I am a great admirer of your inspired projects.
Leanne is in a class all her own and I have come so close to pushing the button. I am from the generation of admiring the "Sticks with Tits" body type, and by tits I mean Leanne size volleyball breasts. I never did get on board with the Kim Kardashian craze that seems to be pervasive through many of the members here. So I chose keep waiting until I see Leanne upper body combined with the gorgeous slender Penelope lower body. Meanwhile I bought the SH165 Rcup as a compromise.

Maybe there is a significant segment of the market that is of the same mind. Several people have posted on my threads supporting what I'm saying here.
I'm hoping maybe you or one of the other manufacturers might give some consideration to this wish vision of mine.
I actually have the plaster mold of this model's breasts - Minka is her name. More than happy to share or provide it.
If there is enough interest, I'll make one. If people are serious and if I can get a commitment of just 15 order with a deposit of non-refundable $100, I can make one.
Hi Doug, I noticed in your post right after this one that you said-" edit, wrong post".
Is it that you are recanting your very interesting offer to do a project like this if I can find the people?
Just when I was getting excited, I hope not.

Re: 158 LeAnne and 162 Krissy body comparison

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 12:08 am
by Mcupplease
Hi horn dude. Wow, love your avatar!
Tiffany Towers has really nice shape and they are surprisingly soft. She is quite short and petite, vs Minka at 5'7" or more, so Minka has considerably more volume at 3,900cc. Each breast has a circumference of 17", with an underbust of 31.5". This mold is one of a kind made by me off her body.
Screenshot_2017-10-07-16-38-34.jpg
Screenshot_2017-10-07-16-38-34.jpg (1.18 MiB) Viewed 2658 times

Re: 158 LeAnne and 162 Krissy body comparison

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 12:13 am
by Mcupplease
PS unconfirmed but a TDF member cited to me the breast volume of Passion Dolls Leanne to be a stunning 4,900cc each. Just for your reference.

Re: 158 LeAnne and 162 Krissy body comparison

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 12:43 am
by horndude
Mcupplease wrote:Hi horn dude. Wow, love your avatar!
Tiffany Towers has really nice shape and they are surprisingly soft. She is quite short and petite, vs Minka at 5'7" or more, so Minka has considerably more volume at 3,900cc. Each breast has a circumference of 17", with an underbust of 31.5". This mold is one of a kind made by me off her body.
Screenshot_2017-10-07-16-38-34.jpg
My avatar is the pinnacle of woman! Thank you.

Minka is so gorgeous. If I had to choose from that amazing 90s busty era, Tiffany has the ideal look even if her volume takes a hit. So small but busty *drools*

One of a kind mold? WOW there has to be a story behind that. I'd love to hear to sometime (how you got the mold). I love it, I bet you're proud of such a priceless item.
Mcupplease wrote:PS unconfirmed but a TDF member cited to me the breast volume of Passion Dolls Leanne to be a stunning 4,900cc each. Just for your reference.
The PD158 is so tempting already and then I hear that...WOW

Re: 158 LeAnne and 162 Krissy body comparison

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 4:15 pm
by Glitch603
PassionDolls wrote:
Mcupplease wrote:Good morning Doug , I am a great admirer of your inspired projects.
Leanne is in a class all her own and I have come so close to pushing the button. I am from the generation of admiring the "Sticks with Tits" body type, and by tits I mean Leanne size volleyball breasts. I never did get on board with the Kim Kardashian craze that seems to be pervasive through many of the members here. So I chose keep waiting until I see Leanne upper body combined with the gorgeous slender Penelope lower body. Meanwhile I bought the SH165 Rcup as a compromise.

Maybe there is a significant segment of the market that is of the same mind. Several people have posted on my threads supporting what I'm saying here.
I'm hoping maybe you or one of the other manufacturers might give some consideration to this wish vision of mine.
I actually have the plaster mold of this model's breasts - Minka is her name. More than happy to share or provide it.
If there is enough interest, I'll make one. If people are serious and if I can get a commitment of just 15 order with a deposit of non-refundable $100, I can make one.

If you're serious about a slender big boob doll I will drop a $100 deposit ASAP

Re: 158 LeAnne and 162 Krissy body comparison

Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 10:25 pm
by PassionDolls
Glitch603 wrote:

If you're serious about a slender big boob doll I will drop a $100 deposit ASAP
Not saying no, but so are I didn't get much interest from potential buyers.

Re: 158 LeAnne and 162 Krissy body comparison

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 1:47 am
by Mcupplease
I have been communicating by way of PM's with a number of members that have expressed interest in many of my other threads along the same topic. So I have 8 or 10 so far. This thread had become non-current and I don't think people are reading it. Also I feel badly that I have derailed the original intent of this thread and I don't want to add to it. So if you are confirming your willingness to consider this project as you initially stated I will start afresh thread which I will keep active and see where it goes.

Re: 158 LeAnne and 162 Krissy body comparison

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 8:25 am
by dolllover27
Mcupplease wrote:I have been communicating by way of PM's with a number of members that have expressed interest in many of my other threads along the same topic. So I have 8 or 10 so far. This thread had become non-current and I don't think people are reading it. Also I feel badly that I have derailed the original intent of this thread and I don't want to add to it. So if you are confirming your willingness to consider this project as you initially stated I will start afresh thread which I will keep active and see where it goes.
Haha I have been away for work and came back wondering if I was looking at a different post :lol:

No need to feel bad Mcupplease. I understand people like to voice what they want in a doll and Doug is usually pretty good at listening to what people have to say.

Look at the PD muscle doll Michele for instance. She may not have been everyone's exact stats for a muscle doll but I feel PD took people's feedback/comments into account and they produced something that the doll market didn't have and did the best they can with the many many requests made for the doll. I guess you will need to talk to Doug about a new doll body type. If you start a new thread I will be sure to check in and see what people have to say.

Re: 158 LeAnne and 162 Krissy body comparison

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 8:31 am
by dolllover27
In the meantime here are some pics of Leanne and Krissy in tight shiny liquid leggings!

Part 01

Re: 158 LeAnne and 162 Krissy body comparison

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 11:24 am
by stones
Fantastic pictures, the matching bikini tops are great too!