Great News- 137cm will be upcoming at this end of month

dollylamma · Post by **dollylamma** » Sun Mar 13, 2016 1:12 pm

The great thing about smaller lighter dolls is you have more ways to have fun.

A doll that can bend at the waist should have no issues. Maybe just ever so slightly forward. But not to the point that other positions are near impossible .

dollguy13 · Post by **dollguy13** » Sun Mar 13, 2016 7:24 pm

acrux wrote:
Slowstoxx wrote:She looks great, but
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE actual realistic vagina/anus placement!
Well, just as an option please! A more forward placement of the vagina than what is anatomically correct is better for missionary.

like your idea acrux on the more forward placement of the vagina. Reality is; ORdolls and WMdolls use to have more forward placement on the dolls. But everyone asked for more "realistic" placement and the vagina was moved back further.

I'm still very confused on what "realstic" means because everyone seems to have a difference of opinion of what that is. Actually making a doll "realistic" is difficult to begin with because a real females anatomy shifts with the pelvis in a way a doll's cannot. Unless your penis is extremely long or can bend at a 90 degree angle the further back you move the vaginal opening the harder to do anything other than maybe doggy style.

All that realism aside, I'd just like a more forward penetration zone like it use to exist too so I'm with you acrux

Post by **ORdoll** » Sun Mar 13, 2016 10:19 pm

acrux wrote:
Slowstoxx wrote:She looks great, but
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE actual realistic vagina/anus placement!
Well, just as an option please! A more forward placement of the vagina than what is anatomically correct is better for missionary.

==========================

:poop2:

Post by **ORdoll** » Sun Mar 13, 2016 10:24 pm

dollylamma wrote:The great thing about smaller lighter dolls is you have more ways to have fun.

A doll that can bend at the waist should have no issues. Maybe just ever so slightly forward. But not to the point that other positions are near impossible .

=================================

Post by **ORdoll** » Sun Mar 13, 2016 10:30 pm

dollguy13 wrote:
acrux wrote:
Slowstoxx wrote:She looks great, but
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE actual realistic vagina/anus placement!
Well, just as an option please! A more forward placement of the vagina than what is anatomically correct is better for missionary.
like your idea acrux on the more forward placement of the vagina. Reality is; ORdolls and WMdolls use to have more forward placement on the dolls. But everyone asked for more "realistic" placement and the vagina was moved back further.

I'm still very confused on what "realstic" means because everyone seems to have a difference of opinion of what that is. Actually making a doll "realistic" is difficult to begin with because a real females anatomy shifts with the pelvis in a way a doll's cannot. Unless your penis is extremely long or can bend at a 90 degree angle the further back you move the vaginal opening the harder to do anything other than maybe doggy style.

All that realism aside, I'd just like a more forward penetration zone like it use to exist too so I'm with you acrux

==================================

Hello dollguy13.

Thank you !

It is very hard to make everyone like it. We just try to make it good.

nemo · Post by **nemo** » Mon Mar 14, 2016 3:45 am

dollguy13 wrote: Reality is; ORdolls and WMdolls use to have more forward placement on the dolls. But everyone asked for more "realistic" placement and the vagina was moved back further.

Well, not everyone. It was just a matter of a couple persistent individuals who kept on about moving the vagina of the 156 cm doll into a more "realistic" position. Hopefully OR can come up with different options here. I'm also very much for a more forward easily accessible placement.

jazzman · Post by **jazzman** » Mon Mar 14, 2016 9:53 am

I am still hoping that some manufacturer will make a TWIGGY doll and especially that gamine TWIGGY face from the 60's . With all the eye makesup and short hair. It will have to be silicone not TPE to keep the heavy makeup.

sture · Post by **sture** » Mon Mar 14, 2016 1:11 pm

Well...you have to take my word here, my Freja (not a OR/WMdoll, but silicone) has her cavities placed where they should be.
There´s certainly no problem with the sex. On the contrary; if it was placed more further the sex would be more difficult to perform...

If the hip is bendable at the waist, there won´t be any problems for the TPE dolls either.
I like the realistic look as well!

The same goes for other silicone brands, I haven´t heard any complains so far about realistic placements
of the cavities...

dollguy13 · Post by **dollguy13** » Mon Mar 14, 2016 2:08 pm

sture wrote:Well...you have to take my word here, my Freja (not a OR/WMdoll, but silicone) has her cavities placed where they should be.
There´s certainly no problem with the sex. On the contrary; if it was placed more further the sex would be more difficult to perform...

If the hip is bendable at the waist, there won´t be any problems for the TPE dolls either.
I like the realistic look as well!

The same goes for other silicone brands, I haven´t heard any complains so far about realistic placements
of the cavities...

If I look at your Freja; and there's not such a big placement difference from ORdoll's other than it's a little more to the front. The main thing I notice is how much more area the vaginal opening takes up and it's much longer labia area. Many silicone doll manufacturers use that design. The bending at the waist is a interesting thought.

But I have confidence that ORdoll will make the vaginal area good. They have already improved the internal design to a uterus design over that silly bumps and grooves design so they are moving toward better designs all the time

nemo · Post by **nemo** » Mon Mar 14, 2016 3:12 pm

sture wrote: The same goes for other silicone brands, I haven´t heard any complains so far about realistic placements
of the cavities...

Well, I have owned two different high-end silicone dolls which both were irritatingly difficult to use in the missionary, and I have seen others complain about this too.

tootsie · Post by **tootsie** » Mon Mar 14, 2016 3:53 pm

@ORdoll Please do put the genitilia in the correct place like a human female.

@nemo The flexibility of these TPE dolls is greater so access to vagina/anus is 0 problem. Silicone dolls do not flex like TPE does so that is why others complain.

dollylamma · Post by **dollylamma** » Mon Mar 14, 2016 6:39 pm

I was waiting for a new doll to be released. I loved most things about her, but her vagina was so far forward the only way to have vaginal sex would be vaginal.

dollguy13 · Post by **dollguy13** » Tue Mar 15, 2016 12:22 am

tootsie wrote:@ORdoll Please do put the genitilia in the correct place like a human female.

@nemo The flexibility of these TPE dolls is greater so access to vagina/anus is 0 problem. Silicone dolls do not flex like TPE does so that is why others complain.

Actually; the dolls vaginal and anal are close to the correct place as it is according to anatomy diagrams. ORdoll moved it further back as requested by some people. All TPE manufacturers, WMdolls, YLdoll, have the same placement now; no TPE manufacturers have it moved back under the pelvis too far and for good reason

Having had 3 ORdolls and 1 WMdoll, 1 ORdoll and 1WMdoll with the original vaginal placement and 2 with the current placement I speak out of experience here.

While as you say TPE does allow for stretching, it does eventually tear around the leg area especially with the extent you have to stretch the legs out to be able to enter at a good angle. Both of my dolls are tearing from the need to flex the legs out to allow for penetration in missionary. And that's not because the TPE material isn't good, all TPE tears eventually with constant stretching. Also the pelvic are joints are loosening due to constant flexing.

I'd much rather it back forward like nemo pointed out; to the way it was when the first dolls came out.

You have to consider that a doll is not a real person. When having intercourse by missionary a real women's vaginal canal internally shifts to a 45 degree angle to accommodate the penis when the partner is on top. Add this to the complexity of movements allowed by the sacroiliac joint and femur with the widening at the pubic symphysis; A doll cannot do that!

The realistic placement of the vagina on a doll makes it extremely difficult to have missionary in a natural way because that "realistic" area you speak of is almost a 90 degree angle from being on top. That means the only way of penetration is by flexing the legs out. With the first dolls; you could be on top of your doll, just like you could a real girl and have ease of access.

Plus, with my current doll; my penis cannot bend like a banana any further to accommodate any more realism. :haha4:

. I say that jokingly but it is true, and not just to me; others have said the same.

Please keep the vaginal area where it is if it cannot be moved back to the way it use to be; sorry for the rant

Post by **ORdoll** » Wed Mar 16, 2016 11:29 pm

nemo wrote:
dollguy13 wrote: Reality is; ORdolls and WMdolls use to have more forward placement on the dolls. But everyone asked for more "realistic" placement and the vagina was moved back further.
Well, not everyone. It was just a matter of a couple persistent individuals who kept on about moving the vagina of the 156 cm doll into a more "realistic" position. Hopefully OR can come up with different options here. I'm also very much for a more forward easily accessible placement.

====================================

We will see when we have the finished doll, I will take pictues to your guys and we try to keep the placement good for use.

Zihan

Post by **ORdoll** » Wed Mar 16, 2016 11:32 pm

jazzman wrote:I am still hoping that some manufacturer will make a TWIGGY doll and especially that gamine TWIGGY face from the 60's . With all the eye makesup and short hair. It will have to be silicone not TPE to keep the heavy makeup.

=======================

Hello Jazzman,

Would you please send a TWIGGY pictures to me ? I really don't know what is TWIGGY face.

Thank you

zihan