The Doll Forum

I don't know-both are the WM163C yet a rear view from two different vendors they look different. If I was to order one, which would I get?

The top image looks more spread. This may be the point where it goes from barely open to gaping.

I think toddyj is right, they're the same, just that the bottom is lubed up and shiny, while the top photo is dry, lower lighting, and more spread. The shape of the clit looks the same on both pictures.

If you're worried about whether either vendor is legit, I know there's a couple resources out there telling people where to buy dolls from. I can DM you a good thread about it if you want.

toddjy wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:05 pm The top image looks more spread. This may be the point where it goes from barely open to gaping.

I agree with this comment ^
the doll looks the same it's a matter of the "spread" that looks different in each of the pictures.

Look at the distance from her vagina to butthole-doesn't look the same to me. May be just an illusion...I dunno.

Holy_Badger wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:15 pm I think toddyj is right, they're the same, just that the bottom is lubed up and shiny, while the top photo is dry, lower lighting, and more spread. The shape of the clit looks the same on both pictures.

If you're worried about whether either vendor is legit, I know there's a couple resources out there telling people where to buy dolls from. I can DM you a good thread about it if you want.

These are legit vendors. The girls just looked different to me.

ColColt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:50 pm Look at the distance from her vagina to butthole-doesn't look the same to me. May be just an illusion...I dunno.

I know what you mean, but I think it's just the angle. If you look at both images and then think about if one was taken at the angle of the other it'd look the same IMO

To help you out, look at where the butthole is placed between the cheeks.

I guess you're all right-just looked odd to me at first.

It amazing what good lighting, camera and a skilled photographer can utterly transform a “plain Jane” doll into a super model….or in this case a more appealing nether region.

However it highlights the need for less highly produced, staged and polished photo shoots. I always prefer a doll that still likes amazing even in poor light, very little makeup and a regular cell phone. I love a carefully crafted photoshoot…. However some boarder on misleading/false advertising. Most should also include more realistic “factory” pics

IMHO the photos represent the same doll just in different quality of photo production, some oil and just a slightly different angle.