Let me try to illustrate what I'm up to. Please see titles of these photos. I'm trying to make a 'craft doll'Mister Designer wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:23 pm I understand so; This is not a sex doll, but a decoration (decor) for a room, a sofa, like a teddy bear?
To me, a realistic doll is always the 'second best' to a human woman. A compromise in a way... A realistic doll can never be better than a human woman because a realistic doll is only an imitation of a human woman. I'm not aiming to come close to a human woman but build a doll that surpasses a human woman in its own way.
Hmm... my primitive brain begins to boil when analyzing such reasoning. I absolutely agree that a beautiful doll will not surpass a beautiful living woman. Why then do you equip this and your other dolls with a vagina?
yeah. It seems that the argument about the attractiveness of the cartoonishness of dolls is starting to dawn on me. I remember I once really liked the fairy Tinkebell and Gadget from Chip and Dale. I even thought about making dolls of them for myself for a while. only small ones. cm 80-100. Another guy I know on the Internet asked me to make him a bunny-girl Judy Hopps. just like in the cartoon. and even sent me these photos. I promised that I would do it if I had the time and the mood. I think this will be quite an interesting activity. making a body is not a big problem. but to fell her head just like in the cartoon. I need to use my brain here
