XT Body: 160H silicone

Post by **XTDoll** » Tue Mar 19, 2024 1:54 am

There is a flaw in 160H. I have to say this. Because the previous mold used a real vagina (which we scanned on a real person at a high price), the anus function was not added at the beginning of the design. But we're already adjusting, and we have to improve on that.

PartThree · Post by **PartThree** » Tue Mar 19, 2024 4:45 am

Well I'll wait for the update. I assume the G cup doesnt have this flaw?

thazehase · Post by **thazehase** » Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:19 am

PartThree wrote: ↑Tue Mar 19, 2024 4:45 am Well I'll wait for the update. I assume the G cup doesnt have this flaw?

Can´t see anything like that on the photoshoots, looks quite nice. Will have one "soon" to look for myself.

PartThree · Post by **PartThree** » Tue Mar 19, 2024 7:37 am

thazehase wrote: ↑Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:19 am
PartThree wrote: ↑Tue Mar 19, 2024 4:45 am Well I'll wait for the update. I assume the G cup doesnt have this flaw?
Can´t see anything like that on the photoshoots, looks quite nice. Will have one "soon" to look for myself.

Nice!

ottar · Post by **ottar** » Tue Mar 19, 2024 9:57 am

XTDoll wrote: ↑Tue Mar 19, 2024 1:54 am There is a flaw in 160H. I have to say this. Because the previous mold used a real vagina (which we scanned on a real person at a high price), the anus function was not added at the beginning of the design. But we're already adjusting, and we have to improve on that.

Thank you. I cannot wait to see the improvement.

Post by **XTDoll** » Wed Mar 20, 2024 2:11 pm

ottar wrote: ↑Tue Mar 19, 2024 9:57 am
XTDoll wrote: ↑Tue Mar 19, 2024 1:54 am There is a flaw in 160H. I have to say this. Because the previous mold used a real vagina (which we scanned on a real person at a high price), the anus function was not added at the beginning of the design. But we're already adjusting, and we have to improve on that.
Thank you. I cannot wait to see the improvement.

Yes, our team members have already started this improvement.

Post by **XTDoll** » Thu Mar 21, 2024 1:39 am

For all orders placed between 2.21 and March 21 regarding the 160CM body shape, if you are not satisfied with the body shape without an asshole, you can directly ask us to re-produce a new version of the 160H body shape with an asshole channel. But please give us a little time to recreate better products for you.

PartThree · Post by **PartThree** » Thu Mar 21, 2024 12:42 pm

I'm curious how this kind of flaw gets past quality control. I can't believe there was any intention here.

Just seems a strange thing to make it into production...too bad, I was liking this one...

Post by **XTDoll** » Thu Mar 21, 2024 1:50 pm

PartThree wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 12:42 pm I'm curious how this kind of flaw gets past quality control. I can't believe there was any intention here.

Just seems a strange thing to make it into production...too bad, I was liking this one...

We originally wanted to try only the vagina without the butthole, after all, she is very beautiful overall, and the details of each part are very realistic. But we were wrong, and made a very big mistake. But it can still be saved, we can adjust.

PartThree · Post by **PartThree** » Thu Mar 21, 2024 2:04 pm

XTDoll wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 1:50 pm
PartThree wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 12:42 pm I'm curious how this kind of flaw gets past quality control. I can't believe there was any intention here.

Just seems a strange thing to make it into production...too bad, I was liking this one...
We originally wanted to try only the vagina without the butthole, after all, she is very beautiful overall, and the details of each part are very realistic. But we were wrong, and made a very big mistake. But it can still be saved, we can adjust.

Oh. I didnt realize there was a market for full size dolls with only one tunnel. Now I know! Just not for me...

horrorhorry · Post by **horrorhorry** » Thu Mar 21, 2024 4:07 pm

XTDoll wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 1:50 pm
PartThree wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 12:42 pm I'm curious how this kind of flaw gets past quality control. I can't believe there was any intention here.

Just seems a strange thing to make it into production...too bad, I was liking this one...
We originally wanted to try only the vagina without the butthole, after all, she is very beautiful overall, and the details of each part are very realistic. But we were wrong, and made a very big mistake. But it can still be saved, we can adjust.

Strange there is another well known manufacturer that makes dolls that only have usable vagina's .... Big difference is they still have a visible butt hole and perfect LHP ... your doll looks strange because the butt hole is completely missing or badly placed ??? you cant see it... and your website still claims there is a "Anus" 14 cm to be precise and 15 cm vagina ?? uhhh what ??
.
.
.

: XT-31-Body-parameters.jpg (574.22 KiB) Viewed 275 times

.
.
.
I think XT doll has all the tools to make amazing dolls .. the only problem is your LHP for the entire lineup is just not good enough .. all future dolls needs some serious LHP improvements ... please take this more seriously on future doll releases.

Noobster 8-64 · Post by **Noobster 8-64** » Thu Mar 21, 2024 7:55 pm

XTDoll wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 1:50 pm
PartThree wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 12:42 pm I'm curious how this kind of flaw gets past quality control. I can't believe there was any intention here.

Just seems a strange thing to make it into production...too bad, I was liking this one...
We originally wanted to try only the vagina without the butthole, after all, she is very beautiful overall, and the details of each part are very realistic. But we were wrong, and made a very big mistake. But it can still be saved, we can adjust.

Fantastic news! Please keep us updated on any developments!

PartThree · Post by **PartThree** » Thu Mar 28, 2024 7:52 am

XTDoll wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 1:39 am For all orders placed between 2.21 and March 21 regarding the 160CM body shape, if you are not satisfied with the body shape without an asshole, you can directly ask us to re-produce a new version of the 160H body shape with an asshole channel. But please give us a little time to recreate better products for you.

Has the issue with the missing anus been fixed? Any updates?

cycleingking · Post by **cycleingking** » Thu Mar 28, 2024 12:05 pm

XTDoll wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 1:50 pm
PartThree wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 12:42 pm I'm curious how this kind of flaw gets past quality control. I can't believe there was any intention here.

Just seems a strange thing to make it into production...too bad, I was liking this one...
We originally wanted to try only the vagina without the butthole, after all, she is very beautiful overall, and the details of each part are very realistic. But we were wrong, and made a very big mistake. But it can still be saved, we can adjust.

I am really happy to hear that XT is is taking fully functional dolls seriously! I stopped looking honestly when I discovered you did not include anus openings in dolls. Very good on the company to listen to feedback, correct the issue and even more- Correct previous shipped dolls that customers have! BRAVO.

"Realistic" is talked about so much lately, body anatomy is paramount. Correct amount of orifices, this includes mouth/anus, and LHP! A doll can't be realistic if missing any of these basic body anatomy features and/or if the placement is not correct! I am now much more interested in XT Doll again. Well done.

Siliconeman · Post by **Siliconeman** » Thu Mar 28, 2024 1:03 pm

thazehase wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 5:18 pm I took a look at the photos on the XTDoll site and I found something we have to talk about. I think that eighter the photo is taken in a way that does not show the crotch area propperly, or the area is laking in design.
7W2A7671-13.jpg

Very confusing picture. This image was at my bad LHP topic. There is both butthole and vaginal hole in same slit. It is hard to see but thats how it is.

Not a nice design. I am glad if it will be fixed....

Sili