Thoughts on DollsCastle LHP

[Echo_Chamber]

Looking for some feedback from owners on which DC models have good LHP. I've seen photos of the 163, 166, and 170, seem to be good, but could use a second opinion.

Also, any info on their TPE blend would help immensely. Looking for something soft and resilient.

Thanks in advance, gentlemen!

[cycleingking]

This is a great resource for LHP: viewtopic.php?t=172314

As for the feel of DC TPE blend, I might recommend searching here: search.php?keywords=softness&fid%5B0%5D=262

Good Luck! The fact that you are paying attention to these type of details prior to purchase will yield great results!!

[Pussy69]

Certain dolls have proper LHP but the rest don’t. Unfortunately they aren’t willing to correct them b/c in their words they aren't real women. So you may like a specific body with big breast, but the LHP is a letdown.

[loomis]

Lhp is fine imo and the tpe blend is nice and soft

[cycleingking]

Looking for some feedback from owners on which DC models have good LHP. I've seen photos of the 163, 166, and 170, seem to be good, but could use a second opinion.

Also, any info on their TPE blend would help immensely. Looking for something soft and resilient.

Thanks in advance, gentlemen!

Hey i had a chance to check them out. I have not found any good pics of the 166 (Alien?) that i could make a judgement from. This is a red flag I find across so many models of every brand, Obscurity. Flat out deceit. What I mean is this, when a company designs a model with correct LHP, it is seldom kept a secret.

163 E cup
I see a lot of trickery with angles. Extreme back arch and no shots taken directly (centered) behind. Again, trickery tells a great deal. Now, with a extreme arch, it looks like you can get pretty decent fun. Depends on what you are looking for!

163cm5ft4-E-cup-TPE-Sex-Doll-Willa-41.jpg (138.07 KiB) Viewed 813 times

163cm5ft4-E-cup-TPE-Sex-Doll-Willa-40-1.jpg (135.28 KiB) Viewed 813 times

170 G cup
This one a bit more clear, I almost purchased this doll myself. I chose the WM 174G instead at the time. That might be one to also consider. Overall tho, based on the ability to do prone bone- clearly combined with her butt being so small, likely not gonna cause too big of a challenge. Skinnier dolls in the butt area are generally more accommodating. This one gets high marks from me.

170cm5ft7-G-cup-TPE-Sex-Doll-Agnetha-15-1.jpg (139.59 KiB) Viewed 813 times

170cm5ft7-G-cup-TPE-Sex-Doll-Agnetha-15.jpg (139.2 KiB) Viewed 813 times

170cm5ft7-G-cup-TPE-Sex-Doll-Agnetha-16-1.jpg (134.79 KiB) Viewed 813 times

170cm5ft7-G-cup-TPE-Sex-Doll-Agnetha-19-1.jpg (144.05 KiB) Viewed 813 times

Worthwhile to check the growing collection of verified LHP lovelies: viewtopic.php?t=172314 You might find one you have not seen before in the process

[Echo_Chamber]

Hey i had a chance to check them out. I have not found any good pics of the 166 (Alien?) that i could make a judgement from. This is a red flag I find across so many models of every brand, Obscurity. Flat out deceit. What I mean is this, when a company designs a model with correct LHP, it is seldom kept a secret.

163 E cup
I see a lot of trickery with angles. Extreme back arch and no shots taken directly (centered) behind. Again, trickery tells a great deal. Now, with a extreme arch, it looks like you can get pretty decent fun. Depends on what you are looking for!

170 G cup
This one a bit more clear, I almost purchased this doll myself. I chose the WM 174G instead at the time. That might be one to also consider. Overall tho, based on the ability to do prone bone- clearly combined with her butt being so small, likely not gonna cause too big of a challenge. Skinnier dolls in the butt area are generally more accommodating. This one gets high marks from me.

Worthwhile to check the growing collection of verified LHP lovelies: viewtopic.php?t=172314 You might find one you have not seen before in the process
[/quote]

Thanks for the response.

Yes, now that you've mentioned the extreme arching of the back to give the appearance of access from the back is become quite obvious.

I do like the bodies of DC 166D Carlyn and the lot of 163B/E (not F as I don't care much for large augments). Seem like reasonable weights, too; ~ 41-42kg. But Carlyn has her bum covered up in both rear shots, and the 163cm dolls seem to share in having their behinds shot with extreme back arches.

Bummer.

I guess then the 170cm types might be the only current offering from DC? Look like they're a bit heavy, too...

[cycleingking]

Thanks for the response.

Yes, now that you've mentioned the extreme arching of the back to give the appearance of access from the back is become quite obvious.

I do like the bodies of DC 166D Carlyn and the lot of 163B/E (not F as I don't care much for large augments). Seem like reasonable weights, too; ~ 41-42kg. But Carlyn has her bum covered up in both rear shots, and the 163cm dolls seem to share in having their behinds shot with extreme back arches.

Bummer.

I guess then the 170cm types might be the only current offering from DC? Look like they're a bit heavy, too...

Hmm, ya know on further glance, That 163E might be worth more investigation.
https://dolls-castle.com/product/ichika-163cm-e-dc08/

What you need is this shot without clothes on

Ichika-163CM-E-DC08_022.jpg (92.84 KiB) Viewed 757 times

More from this shoot with more clear angles used

Ichika-163CM-E-DC08_036-683x1024.jpg (60.26 KiB) Viewed 757 times

Ichika-163CM-E-DC08_037-683x1024.jpg (80.17 KiB) Viewed 757 times

She's a lil hottie too! I see why you are trying to figure this out.

Ichika-163CM-E-DC08_042-683x1024.jpg (67.55 KiB) Viewed 757 times

EDIT: Removed links to other brands as this is not a general thread.

[ondsdoll]

dollscassle163cm-jk3-29.jpg (519.72 KiB) Viewed 363 times

back is arching in a very unnatural and extreme way.
LHP is not correct when you need to break a girls back.

[setevoltas]

viewtopic.php?p=2252836#p2252836